Creed II

Tell us if you found a gem or a piece of shit, and who peddled it

Moderator: Dux

User avatar

Topic author
Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21341
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

Creed II

Post by Turdacious »

Solid but average Rocky movie. Kind of a cross between Rocky III and IV. I rank it 6th of the 8th Rocky films-- much better than the execrable Rocky 5 but only slightly better than the Rocky 4-- so worth watching.
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule


JimZipCode
Top
Posts: 1462
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:48 pm

Re: Creed II

Post by JimZipCode »

Creed 1 was awesome. Does this one approach that?
“War is the remedy our enemies have chosen. Other simple remedies were within their choice. You know it and they know it, but they wanted war, and I say let us give them all they want.”
― William Tecumseh Sherman

User avatar

Topic author
Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21341
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

Re: Creed II

Post by Turdacious »

JimZipCode wrote: Tue Dec 11, 2018 6:03 am Creed 1 was awesome. Does this one approach that?
No. It fell a little flat, especially on the Drago side. It’s still a solid rocky movie and worth watching in the theater though.
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule

User avatar

Kazuya Mishima
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 6394
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 10:11 pm

Re: Creed II

Post by Kazuya Mishima »

Failed to create a compelling villain. The script was too sympathetic toward Drago and son, and they even gave them a Hallmark moment at the very end. Didn't even go down the steroid use rabbit hole to create a "cheater" angle. The only villainous thing in the whole movie was him hitting Creed after he went down, and by then he'd beaten him fair and square.

The notion of him having gone up and fighting at heavyweight was also beyond ridiculous. Creed was a nice reboot, but this was a dismal follow up.

User avatar

Topic author
Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21341
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

Re: Creed II

Post by Turdacious »

Kazuya Mishima wrote: Sun Dec 30, 2018 10:02 pm Failed to create a compelling villain. The script was too sympathetic toward Drago and son, and they even gave them a Hallmark moment at the very end. Didn't even go down the steroid use rabbit hole to create a "cheater" angle. The only villainous thing in the whole movie was him hitting Creed after he went down, and by then he'd beaten him fair and square.

The notion of him having gone up and fighting at heavyweight was also beyond ridiculous. Creed was a nice reboot, but this was a dismal follow up.
The real villain was Drago's/Stallone's ex-- they could have done a lot with that and didn't. I liked Dolph Lundgren, but the rest of the Drago clan was meh.

They should have had Tyson Fury as the villain and maybe cast the Diaz brothers in as his trainers-- let them write their own dialogue. Best picture nominee guaranteed.
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule

User avatar

Kazuya Mishima
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 6394
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 10:11 pm

Re: Creed II

Post by Kazuya Mishima »

Turdacious wrote: Mon Dec 31, 2018 3:58 am
Kazuya Mishima wrote: Sun Dec 30, 2018 10:02 pm Failed to create a compelling villain. The script was too sympathetic toward Drago and son, and they even gave them a Hallmark moment at the very end. Didn't even go down the steroid use rabbit hole to create a "cheater" angle. The only villainous thing in the whole movie was him hitting Creed after he went down, and by then he'd beaten him fair and square.

The notion of him having gone up and fighting at heavyweight was also beyond ridiculous. Creed was a nice reboot, but this was a dismal follow up.
The real villain was Drago's/Stallone's ex-- they could have done a lot with that and didn't. I liked Dolph Lundgren, but the rest of the Drago clan was meh.

They should have had Tyson Fury as the villain and maybe cast the Diaz brothers in as his trainers-- let them write their own dialogue. Best picture nominee guaranteed.
This.

They didn't even have the good sense to turn the boxing promoter into the villain. No villainy, no animosity...just an NPC putting together a fight that everyone wanted to see.

I think Creed 2 is a good example of Hollywood losing its way. I know everyone extols the virtues of these young filmmakers coming in with perspectives "outside of the system", but Jesus Christ they are missing some basic blocking and tackling skills. As corny a movie as Rocky III was, it was at least good basic storytelling. Manufactured a villain to hate, and created real dramatic tension between Rocky, Mick, Apollo, and Adrian.

It also doesn't help when you give the protagonist the character and IQ of the kid at the local McDonald's who can't get my order right. Rocky doesn't want anything to do with the fight, and Creed immediately goes into O HOW U GONE DO ME LIKE DAT mode. You can't create dramatic tension that an audience will care about by having your main character become an insufferable asshole at the drop of a hat.

It's just shit.

User avatar

nafod
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 13101
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:01 pm
Location: Looking in your window

Re: Creed II

Post by nafod »

Somebody needed to die. Full commitment. Should have been Victor, killed by Creed in the fight, as Ivan is trying to throw in the towel. That would have blown a bunch of character’s heads wide open and been the right setup for Creed III.
Don’t believe everything you think.

Post Reply