The Fappening

Topics without replies are pruned every 365 days. Not moderated.

Moderator: Dux

User avatar

Koko, Beware
Gunny
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 3:29 pm
Location: Pilgrim Country

Re: The Fappening

Post by Koko, Beware »

I don't discount Bud's argument. Regardless of how much I generally love celebrity schadenfreude, there's something pretty fucking oily and corrosive about this, whether this instance or ones before it.

I also would guess 50+ % of the shriekers have at one point or another either posted, commented on, or laughed at pictures of complete strangers on FB with less than zero fucks given about how crappy it is to take a picture of some fat lady/hairy guy on a beach just because the photographer and the photographer's tiny little peabrain thought that person ought to be mocked in public today.
In the mill, getting down.
-Kotto

User avatar

Grandpa's Spells
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 11561
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm

Re: The Fappening

Post by Grandpa's Spells »

Bud Charniga's grape ape wrote:Setting aside that millions of people do see leaked photos of Starbucks baristas -- or else revenge porn websites wouldn't be a thing.
Different by an order of magnitude.
In any other context, when there's an online security breach that compromises personal data, the onus is placed on (a) the hackers and (b) possibly the company that allowed the breach to occur. It's only when it's CELEBRITY NOODZ that people start to talk about "personal responsibility."
Nobody is absolving the hackers, and people do indeed bring up personal responsibility when you do dumb things that get you victimized. In fact, people get really angry when you suggest college women should take steps to protect themselves that college men don't have to.
One of the downsides of the Internet is that it allows like-minded people to form communities, and sometimes those communities are stupid.

User avatar

Mickey O'neil
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 22168
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: The Pale Blue Dot

Re: The Fappening

Post by Mickey O'neil »

dead man walking wrote:like bud charniga's . . . john stewart is right on it

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcXmMavFTwo[/youtube]

User avatar

Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21342
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

Re: The Fappening

Post by Turdacious »

Bud Charniga's grape ape wrote:
Grandpa's Spells wrote:Same with privacy. Millions of people are not going to see a hacked leaked photo of a Starbucks barista. A celebrity has to worry about this more than a Starbucks barista, because they are a bigger target. That doesn't mean the celebrity is asking for it. The world fucks with people whether they ask for it or not, so plan accordingly.
Setting aside that millions of people do see leaked photos of Starbucks baristas -- or else revenge porn websites wouldn't be a thing.

In any other context, when there's an online security breach that compromises personal data, the onus is placed on (a) the hackers and (b) possibly the company that allowed the breach to occur. It's only when it's CELEBRITY NOODZ that people start to talk about "personal responsibility."
If you live in a bad neighborhood, don't lock your car doors, and get your car stolen-- that's exactly what they say.

It's not like celebs haven't been warned: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_Inter ... ng_scandal
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule

User avatar

Batboy2/75
Starship Trooper
Posts: 7670
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 3:58 am
Location: Pumping Elizebeth Shue's Ass!

Re: The Fappening

Post by Batboy2/75 »

I love how the idiots have started shrieking "Your blaming the victim!" when you point out that common sense would have avoided all the trouble. Storing or back up your nude selfie pics to the cloud is akin to leaving a large amount your cash locked in the car glove box. Yeah, it's kind of secure, but in reality it's not. And wishing it was otherwise isn't going to change reality. Life isn't fair; get the fuck over it and start using some common sense.

No one is absolving the criminal hackers, but don't be an idiot and make their lives easier.
Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of arms is the distinction of the free man from the slave.

I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.


Image

User avatar

Holland Oates
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 14137
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:32 am
Location: GAWD'S Country
Contact:

Re: The Fappening

Post by Holland Oates »

All words and no pics. You're all faggots.
Southern Hospitality Is Aggressive Hospitality


Wild Bill
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 5992
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 2:26 am

Re: The Fappening

Post by Wild Bill »

Ed Zachary wrote:All words and no pics. You're all faggots.
In the "random picture" thread link to archive.

User avatar

Holland Oates
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 14137
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:32 am
Location: GAWD'S Country
Contact:

Re: The Fappening

Post by Holland Oates »

Wild Bill wrote: In the "random picture" thread link to archive.
Think about Proto!

User avatar

DrDonkeyLove
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 8034
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 4:04 am
Location: Deep in a well

Re: The Fappening

Post by DrDonkeyLove »

It's OK to feel badly for young people who've made poorly reasoned decisions. Most of us are guilty of an equivalent level of stupid at that age.

I feel for the foolish hacker/s who accomplished this magnificent gem of a hack. They are about to experience the dark side of government high level of investigation that will imprison them and fine them beyond belief. For what reward? Bad bad decision.

And Apple, has a gang bang of law suits en route.


milosz
Top
Posts: 1876
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 10:40 pm

Re: The Fappening

Post by milosz »

Mickey O'neil wrote:Funny how everyone saying this is like a sex crime, etc weren't yelling and screaming when this happened to Rhianna, Christina A., Paris Hilton, Kim K. and all the other chicks this had happen. Different standard when it is someone like Jennifer Lawrence? It sounds like bullshit to me.
Paris and Kardashian were in on their sex tapes being released, is one difference.

User avatar

Kenny X
Sgt. Major
Posts: 2712
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 4:00 pm
Location: Down on the bayou.

Re: The Fappening

Post by Kenny X »

milosz wrote:
Mickey O'neil wrote:Funny how everyone saying this is like a sex crime, etc weren't yelling and screaming when this happened to Rhianna, Christina A., Paris Hilton, Kim K. and all the other chicks this had happen. Different standard when it is someone like Jennifer Lawrence? It sounds like bullshit to me.
Paris and Kardashian were in on their sex tapes being released, is one difference.

I can grok what Mickey is saying, and milosz's sensible opinion there as well.

Paris Hilton was making sex tapes and flashing her piss flaps to the paparazzi with Brit-Brit and Lindsay Cokehead while Kim K. was banging Mandingos on-camera and they all did it for attention. They set the standard for that kind of thing. And probably got paid a little. They deserve whatever trash gets talked about them.

As to people who get their phones hacked, I don't think it's a violation like "rape" is and I don't think it's "rape culture" either. It's more like just the usual skulduggery that people get off on because they feel like they're getting away with being "naughty" by leaking private pictures, and dirty bitches like Paris Hilton exploit that shit for personal gain.

It's The Circle of Life.

Also, I send The Future Mrs. Herr Doktor dick pics all the time, as well as pics of my torso and abs, which look more and more awesome every week that I work with Tom Furman. If anybody wants an eyefull, don't go through the trouble of hacking me, just ask!!


dead man walking
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 6797
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm

Re: The Fappening

Post by dead man walking »

no dick pics, dr

i expect, though, that you will post pics of your skinny self in your wedding dress
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.

User avatar

Kenny X
Sgt. Major
Posts: 2712
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 4:00 pm
Location: Down on the bayou.

Re: The Fappening

Post by Kenny X »

dead man walking wrote:no dick pics, dr

i expect, though, that you will post pics of your skinny self in your wedding dress
In various stages of undress with that wedding dress... \:D/


Wild Bill
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 5992
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 2:26 am

Re: The Fappening

Post by Wild Bill »

Image

User avatar

Kenny X
Sgt. Major
Posts: 2712
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 4:00 pm
Location: Down on the bayou.

Re: The Fappening

Post by Kenny X »

Wild Bill wrote:Image
She had me until I saw the bottle of Corona Light.

User avatar

kreator
Top
Posts: 1287
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:52 am

Re: The Fappening

Post by kreator »

Bud Charniga's grape ape wrote:
Grandpa's Spells wrote:Same with privacy. Millions of people are not going to see a hacked leaked photo of a Starbucks barista. A celebrity has to worry about this more than a Starbucks barista, because they are a bigger target. That doesn't mean the celebrity is asking for it. The world fucks with people whether they ask for it or not, so plan accordingly.
Setting aside that millions of people do see leaked photos of Starbucks baristas -- or else revenge porn websites wouldn't be a thing.

In any other context, when there's an online security breach that compromises personal data, the onus is placed on (a) the hackers and (b) possibly the company that allowed the breach to occur. It's only when it's CELEBRITY NOODZ that people start to talk about "personal responsibility."
Speaking of online privacy issues for the common man/woman... what's your screen name about?

User avatar

Kenny X
Sgt. Major
Posts: 2712
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 4:00 pm
Location: Down on the bayou.

Re: The Fappening

Post by Kenny X »

kreator wrote:
Bud Charniga's grape ape wrote:
Grandpa's Spells wrote:Same with privacy. Millions of people are not going to see a hacked leaked photo of a Starbucks barista. A celebrity has to worry about this more than a Starbucks barista, because they are a bigger target. That doesn't mean the celebrity is asking for it. The world fucks with people whether they ask for it or not, so plan accordingly.
Setting aside that millions of people do see leaked photos of Starbucks baristas -- or else revenge porn websites wouldn't be a thing.

In any other context, when there's an online security breach that compromises personal data, the onus is placed on (a) the hackers and (b) possibly the company that allowed the breach to occur. It's only when it's CELEBRITY NOODZ that people start to talk about "personal responsibility."
Speaking of online privacy issues for the common man/woman... what's your screen name about?
I've been curious about that too.

Post Reply