If you really believe there's a comparison there...well...sir, You might consider deep breathing exercises and a news-fast and some think-binging.johno wrote:Obama was a narcissistic Pampered Prince, who resented the US. Traitor might be a stretch.Blaidd Drwg wrote:Obama for all his faults was not a malignant narcissistic shitbag.
Travel ban cockup
Moderator: Dux
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 19098
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 5:39 pm
Re: Travel ban cockup
Post by Blaidd Drwg »
Blaidd Drwg
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 5:46 pm
- Location: TX
Re: Travel ban cockup
Post by powerlifter54 »
Off the grid the past week. I don't have a substantial issue with the new order or your view. But nobody was held for more than a few hours, and I am suspiscious of any refugee or green card holder from one of those countries, and several others, who choose to travel back to their home country or other areas with entrenched jihad. I think they need to be screened closely. Very closely.Blaidd Drwg wrote:powerlifter54 wrote:Open to your insight.Blaidd Drwg wrote:powerlifter54 wrote:Not on the precedent, not on the law, but on some 3rd party rights sham to protect Starbucks and Udub so they can import people to work for them.
Apparently not a sham after all......
Weird how when you do your homework, things have nuance and complexity.
The travel ban issue that the states came out hardest on involved those same due process arguments I raised..specifically..if you have already granted a visa or green card to allow someone in and you summarily deny that, it raises serious questions about due process not just for those holders of those documents but the 3rd party sponsors and beneficiaries of those people's labor.
When Trump's folks went back and revised the order this is the area they reworked specifically to avoid these due process challenges.
I think the rest of the EO had some optic problems (but this is a guy with a comb-over and is a pathological liar...so optics are not high on his list. ) but on balance it is sound and within the current practice of Exec purvue. So the part that stayed I take no issue with. But with those specific areas above, I did think there were real problems from the jump. Apparently Trump's legal team is less bullish and leans towards agreeing that the States could win.
Still bettting the 9th circus will block it. And so the game goes.
"But even snake wrestling beats life in the cube, for me at least. In measured doses."-Lex
powerlifter54
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 19098
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 5:39 pm
Re: Travel ban cockup
Post by Blaidd Drwg »
powerlifter54 wrote:Off the grid the past week. I don't have a substantial issue with the new order or your view. But nobody was held for more than a few hours,
My point was not that the net effect of his illegal action was bad....but that it was on its face, badly construed and not supportable. This is why the States opposed it, the Courts blocked it and ultimately the Trump Administration backed off.
http://www.latimes.com/politics/washing ... story.html
You mean countries like the UK? http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-32026985powerlifter54 wrote: and I am suspiscious of any refugee or green card holder from one of those countries, and several others, who choose to travel back to their home country or other areas with entrenched jihad. I think they need to be screened closely. Very closely.
Where would Green card holders legitimately go back to? Many are here specifically to benefit their families back home and the Green card process post 9/11 is radically more complicated and involves far more scrutiny than pre 9/11.
http://www.americanbar.org/publications ... olicy.html
Blaidd Drwg
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 5:46 pm
- Location: TX
Re: Travel ban cockup
Post by powerlifter54 »
This is a long war.
"But even snake wrestling beats life in the cube, for me at least. In measured doses."-Lex
powerlifter54
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21342
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
- Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan
Re: Travel ban cockup
Post by Turdacious »
Turdacious
-
- Top
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:30 pm
- Location: Between the thighs, taint, and retractable claw.
Re: Travel ban cockup
Can a country be removed from the list? What's the process of reviewing the list?
My cousin is a redheaded german-mexican, we call him a beanerschnitzel
Testiclaw
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm
Re: Travel ban cockup
Post by dead man walking »
it started in 1095powerlifter54 wrote:This is a long war.
it won't be won with bans, drones, and special operators, however valuable they might be at times.
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.
dead man walking
Re: Travel ban cockup
Just one comparo: Obama campaigns to leave Iraq, then flees Iraq, against all military & State Dept. advice. (And Iraq falls apart.) Trump campaigns to "waterboard & worse" terrorists, then hires Mattis & McMaster and defers to their expert judgement on that subject. So who is the narcissistic, arrogant know-it-all?Blaidd Drwg wrote:If you really believe there's a comparison there...well...sir, You might consider deep breathing exercises and a news-fast and some think-binging.johno wrote:Obama was a narcissistic Pampered Prince, who resented the US. Traitor might be a stretch.Blaidd Drwg wrote:Obama for all his faults was not a malignant narcissistic shitbag.
Yes, I know it's early. But you're being distracted by the Shiny Things. Maybe a coffee enema and some edamame anal beads will clear your mind.
Are full of passionate intensity.
W.B. Yeats
johno
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 19098
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 5:39 pm
Re: Travel ban cockup
Post by Blaidd Drwg »
johno wrote:Just one comparo: Obama campaigns to leave Iraq, then flees Iraq, against all military & State Dept. advice. (And Iraq falls apart.) Trump campaigns to "waterboard & worse" terrorists, then hires Mattis & McMaster and defers to their expert judgement on that subject. So who is the narcissistic, arrogant know-it-all?Blaidd Drwg wrote:If you really believe there's a comparison there...well...sir, You might consider deep breathing exercises and a news-fast and some think-binging.johno wrote:Obama was a narcissistic Pampered Prince, who resented the US. Traitor might be a stretch.Blaidd Drwg wrote:Obama for all his faults was not a malignant narcissistic shitbag.
Yes, I know it's early. But you're being distracted by the Shiny Things. Maybe a coffee enema and some edamame anal beads will clear your mind.
You're deeply confused if you find that compelling.
Blaidd Drwg
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 8034
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 4:04 am
- Location: Deep in a well
Re: Travel ban cockup
Post by DrDonkeyLove »
I think it's possible to have two consecutive presidents who are opposites in demeanor and ideology. Both suburb at stirring tribal passions. Both uber narcissists who were unprepared for the presidency when elected.Blaidd Drwg wrote:You're deeply confused if you find that compelling.johno wrote:Just one comparo: Obama campaigns to leave Iraq, then flees Iraq, against all military & State Dept. advice. (And Iraq falls apart.) Trump campaigns to "waterboard & worse" terrorists, then hires Mattis & McMaster and defers to their expert judgement on that subject. So who is the narcissistic, arrogant know-it-all?Blaidd Drwg wrote:If you really believe there's a comparison there...well...sir, You might consider deep breathing exercises and a news-fast and some think-binging.johno wrote:Obama was a narcissistic Pampered Prince, who resented the US. Traitor might be a stretch.Blaidd Drwg wrote:Obama for all his faults was not a malignant narcissistic shitbag.
Yes, I know it's early. But you're being distracted by the Shiny Things. Maybe a coffee enema and some edamame anal beads will clear your mind.
Mao wrote:Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. Our principle is that the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party
DrDonkeyLove
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 19098
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 5:39 pm
Re: Travel ban cockup
Post by Blaidd Drwg »
Trying to make a reasonable like for like comparison is indicative of someone extremely out of touch with reality. I voted for neither...but I do have a fairly keen insight into things which are obvious.
Blaidd Drwg
-
- Sgt. Major
- Posts: 4376
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:27 pm
- Location: 4th largest city in America
Re: Travel ban cockup
Post by The Ginger Beard Man »
You can't possibly be serious with that date.dead man walking wrote:it started in 1095powerlifter54 wrote:This is a long war.
it won't be won with bans, drones, and special operators, however valuable they might be at times.
Blaidd Drwg wrote:Disengage from the outcome and do work.
Jezzy Bell wrote:Use a fucking barbell, pansy.
The Ginger Beard Man
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm
Re: Travel ban cockup
Post by dead man walking »
first crusade. xtians and muslims have been at it off and on since thenThe Ginger Beard Man wrote:You can't possibly be serious with that date.dead man walking wrote:it started in 1095powerlifter54 wrote:This is a long war.
it won't be won with bans, drones, and special operators, however valuable they might be at times.
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.
dead man walking
-
- Sgt. Major
- Posts: 4376
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:27 pm
- Location: 4th largest city in America
Re: Travel ban cockup
Post by The Ginger Beard Man »
Blaidd Drwg wrote:Disengage from the outcome and do work.
Jezzy Bell wrote:Use a fucking barbell, pansy.
The Ginger Beard Man
-
- Sgt. Major
- Posts: 4376
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:27 pm
- Location: 4th largest city in America
Re: Travel ban cockup
Post by The Ginger Beard Man »
Is this as bad as some random jackass burning a Koran?
Blaidd Drwg wrote:Disengage from the outcome and do work.
Jezzy Bell wrote:Use a fucking barbell, pansy.
The Ginger Beard Man
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm
Re: Travel ban cockup
Post by dead man walking »
fair point.The Ginger Beard Man wrote:http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/imperial ... tours.html
You're off by more than three centuries.
i thought about going back to the muslim invasion, but i kinda like the crusades because dubya referred to the u.s. invasion of iraq as a "crusade," bringing us full circle one millenium after the original and causing much hand-wringing.
in any case, it's a long war likely to be unaffected by a temporary travel ban on a few countries.
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.
dead man walking
-
- Sgt. Major
- Posts: 4376
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:27 pm
- Location: 4th largest city in America
Re: Travel ban cockup
Post by The Ginger Beard Man »
I agree with you on both the travel ban and W choice of word. But I get tired of the whole "white people started it with the crusades" argument that I see/hear so often.dead man walking wrote:fair point.The Ginger Beard Man wrote:http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/imperial ... tours.html
You're off by more than three centuries.
i thought about going back to the muslim invasion, but i kinda like the crusades because dubya referred to the u.s. invasion of iraq as a "crusade," bringing us full circle one millenium after the original and causing much hand-wringing.
in any case, it's a long war likely to be unaffected by a temporary travel ban on a few countries.
Blaidd Drwg wrote:Disengage from the outcome and do work.
Jezzy Bell wrote:Use a fucking barbell, pansy.
The Ginger Beard Man
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm
Re: Travel ban cockup
Post by dead man walking »
right.The Ginger Beard Man wrote: But I get tired of the whole "white people started it with the crusades" argument that I see/hear so often.
i didn't consider implications of choosing the crusades as a starting point, that is, christians started it.
not my meaning at all, but your note tells me to be more careful.
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.
dead man walking
Re: Travel ban cockup
Yeah, well Foreign Policy does bore some people.Blaidd Drwg wrote:You're deeply confused if you find that compelling.johno wrote: Obama campaigns to leave Iraq, then flees Iraq, against all military & State Dept. advice. (And Iraq falls apart.) Trump campaigns to "waterboard & worse" terrorists, then hires Mattis & McMaster and defers to their expert judgement on that subject. So who is the narcissistic, arrogant know-it-all?
Are full of passionate intensity.
W.B. Yeats
johno
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 19098
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 5:39 pm
Re: Travel ban cockup
Post by Blaidd Drwg »
johno wrote:Yeah, well Foreign Policy does bore some people.Blaidd Drwg wrote:You're deeply confused if you find that compelling.johno wrote: Obama campaigns to leave Iraq, then flees Iraq, against all military & State Dept. advice. (And Iraq falls apart.) Trump campaigns to "waterboard & worse" terrorists, then hires Mattis & McMaster and defers to their expert judgement on that subject. So who is the narcissistic, arrogant know-it-all?
You really should be embarrassed. Of the shit options Obama had he chose Bush2 Electric boogaloo....reasonable minds can differ on how either of them handled that shit sandwich....but then...Trump.
Seriously. Have some dignity, Some shame. Show you're smarter than the cats you're' attempting to herd.
Blaidd Drwg
-
Topic author - Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm
Re: Travel ban cockup
Post by Grandpa's Spells »
Grandpa's Spells
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 8034
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 4:04 am
- Location: Deep in a well
Re: Travel ban cockup
Post by DrDonkeyLove »
It's almost like he wants it to get blocked. Part of a clever Trumpian strategy? Utter incompetence? Both? Neither? Definitely part of the Trump principal of uncertainty which allows one to jump down their favorite rabbit hole with confidence.Grandpa's Spells wrote:Iraq revisionism aside, this EO just got blocked, in part because Miller and Trump ran around saying it's basically the same as the last one.
Mao wrote:Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. Our principle is that the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party
DrDonkeyLove