Sounds good, I love scorched earth as much as anybody. Keep us posted.powerlifter54 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 31, 2018 3:59 pm Congress was never what the Dems feared. New Year, New AG, declassified docs, new Special Prosecutor.
Better than Bowl Season.
What to make of the election?
Moderator: Dux
Re: What to make of the election?

Thud
-
Topic author - Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21342
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
- Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan
Re: What to make of the election?
Post by Turdacious »
You definitely called that right. For those troubled by this there is help.Schlegel wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:42 pmYeah, i think too many people worked on it to keep anything juicy from leaking a hint or two. It would just be too tempting for somebody, somewhere.Fat Cat wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 5:39 pmThat's what I've been reading. It's hard to look at the way this is shaping up and think that Mueller has developed some really jaw-dropping high crimes and misdemeanors that could fuel an impeachment.Schlegel wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 2:46 am Mueller investigation is basically done, cnn says they are in the report writing phase and most investigators are now returned to their normal jobs. So there's not really anything to obstruct now. It's gonna be a damp squib, but get ready for the cries of "the new AG stopped Mueller's work prematurely"

Turdacious
Re: What to make of the election?
Hopefully some people go to jail for weaponizing the intelligence apparatus against a citizen running for office and elected official who did nothing wrong.
Obama and co are Commie trash.

Herv100
Re: What to make of the election?
Manafort is probably high-fiving his cell mate.
nafod
-
Topic author - Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21342
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
- Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan
Re: What to make of the election?
Post by Turdacious »
Denial's a hell of a drug.nafod wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2019 1:55 am Call me a little surprised that Don Jr wasn't charged with lying. You wonder why all the rest of those Trump hangers-on lied about Russia and then lied about lying about Russia. Habit, I guess. Organizational culture.
Manafort is probably high-fiving his cell mate.
Turdacious
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 5:46 pm
- Location: TX
Re: What to make of the election?
Post by powerlifter54 »
I would laugh, but it still hasn’t gotten good.
This might be a good time to eat a big meal before swimming or running with scissors if you are a Democrat.
My next prediction is Trump has over an 80% chance of winning re-election, but still a lot can happen.
But when he wins, and I feel more confident about relection than even when I was telling you drones he would win the first time (and slightly less than when I Told you Mueller was gonna get nothing), we are going to get some real scorched earth.
Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Ohr, McCabe, and Strzok all very exposed. Rosenstein also signed a false FISA warrant and admitted to offering to wear a wire.
These dumbasses tried to take out a President. They missed.
What goes around comes around.
"But even snake wrestling beats life in the cube, for me at least. In measured doses."-Lex
powerlifter54
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm
Re: What to make of the election?
Post by Grandpa's Spells »
Word?
Not sure SDNY agrees. Even Barr, who won't release the report yet, says Trump wasn't exonerated. Let's see what comes out.Hopefully some people go to jail for weaponizing the intelligence apparatus against a citizen running for office and elected official who did nothing wrong.
Grandpa's Spells
Re: What to make of the election?
From the Barr memo"President Putin says it's not Russia. I don't see any reason why it would be,"
Trump knew all of this when he was excusing Putin.The Special Counsel’s investigation determined that there were two main Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election. The first involved attempts by a Russian organization, the Internet Research Agency (IRA), to conduct disinformation and social media operations in the United States designed to sow social discord, eventually with the aim of interfering with the election...
The second element involved the Russian government’s efforts to conduct computer hacking operations designed to gather and disseminate information to influence the election. The Special Counsel found that Russian government actors successfully hacked into computers and obtained emails from persons associated with the Clinton campaign and Democratic Party organizations, and publicly disseminated those materials through various intermediaries, including WikiLeaks.
And you wonder why people thought he was colluding.
nafod
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 5:46 pm
- Location: TX
Re: What to make of the election?
Post by powerlifter54 »
"But even snake wrestling beats life in the cube, for me at least. In measured doses."-Lex
powerlifter54
Re: What to make of the election?
I look forward to reading the Mueller Report and finding out why Mueller specifically didn’t exonerate him on obstruction.
nafod
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm
Re: What to make of the election?
Post by Grandpa's Spells »
It appears our MAGAmigos were a bit premature in their celebration.Grandpa's Spells wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2019 5:13 pmWord?Not sure SDNY agrees. Even Barr, who won't release the report yet, says Trump wasn't exonerated. Let's see what comes out.Hopefully some people go to jail for weaponizing the intelligence apparatus against a citizen running for office and elected official who did nothing wrong.
Grandpa's Spells
-
- Top
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:48 pm
Re: What to make of the election?
Post by JimZipCode »
Don't be ridiculous. The report completely exonerates Trump. He told us so many times.Grandpa's Spells wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2019 4:43 pmIt appears our MAGAmigos were a bit premature in their celebration.
― William Tecumseh Sherman
JimZipCode
johno
nafod
johno
Re: What to make of the election?
He basically obstructed Justice clear as day, to hide something (s). As Mueller noted, to paraphrase, "the evidence does indicate a thorough FBI investigation would uncover facts that the president would understand to be crimes."
Probably a shit-ton of things. Unless all of those things involved Trump touching himself in the closet, other people know. Like David pecker, who caught and killed stories for Trump. Think he didn't have real leverage over or president? You trust him?
Trump is all their bitches.
nafod
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm
Re: What to make of the election?
Post by Grandpa's Spells »
Grandpa's Spells
-
Topic author - Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21342
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
- Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan
Re: What to make of the election?
Post by Turdacious »
https://theweek.com/speedreads/836125/c ... each-trumpMueller in his report did not draw a conclusion on whether Trump obstructed justice but specifically said that "if we had confidence" Trump did not do so, "we would so state." The report also says, "The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the president's corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law."
This is the sentence that Toobin says is key, calling it "all but an explicit invitation to Congress to impeach the president." Toobin also concluded that there's "no other way" to read this sentence other than Mueller telling Congress he "cannot enforce the obstruction of justice laws against the president" but that lawmakers "can do it" through impeachment.
Toobin clarified that he's not sure whether Congress will — or even should — actually impeach Trump.
Translation-- well below even the Kim Foxx standard of indictment at this point.
Turdacious
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm
Re: What to make of the election?
Post by Grandpa's Spells »
That's actually the only translation you can't make. Mueller specifically says he is following OLC guidelines that he can't indict.Turdacious wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2019 2:35 amhttps://theweek.com/speedreads/836125/c ... each-trumpMueller in his report did not draw a conclusion on whether Trump obstructed justice but specifically said that "if we had confidence" Trump did not do so, "we would so state." The report also says, "The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the president's corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law."
This is the sentence that Toobin says is key, calling it "all but an explicit invitation to Congress to impeach the president." Toobin also concluded that there's "no other way" to read this sentence other than Mueller telling Congress he "cannot enforce the obstruction of justice laws against the president" but that lawmakers "can do it" through impeachment.
Toobin clarified that he's not sure whether Congress will — or even should — actually impeach Trump.
Translation-- well below even the Kim Foxx standard of indictment at this point.
Grandpa's Spells
Re: What to make of the election?
I see it as Mueller telling congress to do its job.Grandpa's Spells wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2019 1:21 pmThat's actually the only translation you can't make. Mueller specifically says he is following OLC guidelines that he can't indict.Turdacious wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2019 2:35 amhttps://theweek.com/speedreads/836125/c ... each-trumpMueller in his report did not draw a conclusion on whether Trump obstructed justice but specifically said that "if we had confidence" Trump did not do so, "we would so state." The report also says, "The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the president's corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law."![]()
This is the sentence that Toobin says is key, calling it "all but an explicit invitation to Congress to impeach the president." Toobin also concluded that there's "no other way" to read this sentence other than Mueller telling Congress he "cannot enforce the obstruction of justice laws against the president" but that lawmakers "can do it" through impeachment.
Toobin clarified that he's not sure whether Congress will — or even should — actually impeach Trump.
Translation-- well below even the Kim Foxx standard of indictment at this point.
From the Mueller report
So who is in charge in the White House? The guy who was elected, or a bunch of appointed officials? Who is going to make decisions when we have an actual crisis that needs a president who isn’t a fucking idiot?The President’s efforts to influence the investigation were mostly unsuccessful, but that is largely because the persons who surrounded the President declined to carry out orders or accede to his requests. Comey did not end the investigation of Flynn, which ultimately resulted in Flynn’s prosecution and conviction for lying to the FBI. McGahn did not tell the Acting Attorney General that the Special Counsel must be removed, but was instead prepared to resign over the President’s order. Lewandowski and Dearborn did not deliver the President’s message to Sessions that he should confine the Russia investigation to future election meddling only. And McGahn refused to recede from his recollections about events surrounding the President’s direction to have the Special Counsel removed, despite the President’s multiple demands that he do so.
nafod
-
Topic author - Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21342
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
- Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan
Re: What to make of the election?
Post by Turdacious »
Mueller is saying that the Orange One running his mouth on Twitter and venting in meetings doesn't meet obstruction standards.Grandpa's Spells wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2019 1:21 pmThat's actually the only translation you can't make. Mueller specifically says he is following OLC guidelines that he can't indict.Turdacious wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2019 2:35 amhttps://theweek.com/speedreads/836125/c ... each-trumpMueller in his report did not draw a conclusion on whether Trump obstructed justice but specifically said that "if we had confidence" Trump did not do so, "we would so state." The report also says, "The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the president's corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law."
This is the sentence that Toobin says is key, calling it "all but an explicit invitation to Congress to impeach the president." Toobin also concluded that there's "no other way" to read this sentence other than Mueller telling Congress he "cannot enforce the obstruction of justice laws against the president" but that lawmakers "can do it" through impeachment.
Toobin clarified that he's not sure whether Congress will — or even should — actually impeach Trump.
Translation-- well below even the Kim Foxx standard of indictment at this point.
Turdacious
-
Topic author - Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21342
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
- Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan
Re: What to make of the election?
Post by Turdacious »
Almost like Mueller knows what a tacit understanding is. News flash-- leaders sometimes vent their frustrations to subordinates.nafod wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2019 4:24 pmI see it as Mueller telling congress to do its job.Grandpa's Spells wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2019 1:21 pmThat's actually the only translation you can't make. Mueller specifically says he is following OLC guidelines that he can't indict.Turdacious wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2019 2:35 amhttps://theweek.com/speedreads/836125/c ... each-trumpMueller in his report did not draw a conclusion on whether Trump obstructed justice but specifically said that "if we had confidence" Trump did not do so, "we would so state." The report also says, "The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the president's corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law."![]()
This is the sentence that Toobin says is key, calling it "all but an explicit invitation to Congress to impeach the president." Toobin also concluded that there's "no other way" to read this sentence other than Mueller telling Congress he "cannot enforce the obstruction of justice laws against the president" but that lawmakers "can do it" through impeachment.
Toobin clarified that he's not sure whether Congress will — or even should — actually impeach Trump.
Translation-- well below even the Kim Foxx standard of indictment at this point.
From the Mueller report
So who is in charge in the White House? The guy who was elected, or a bunch of appointed officials? Who is going to make decisions when we have an actual crisis that needs a president who isn’t a fucking idiot?The President’s efforts to influence the investigation were mostly unsuccessful, but that is largely because the persons who surrounded the President declined to carry out orders or accede to his requests. Comey did not end the investigation of Flynn, which ultimately resulted in Flynn’s prosecution and conviction for lying to the FBI. McGahn did not tell the Acting Attorney General that the Special Counsel must be removed, but was instead prepared to resign over the President’s order. Lewandowski and Dearborn did not deliver the President’s message to Sessions that he should confine the Russia investigation to future election meddling only. And McGahn refused to recede from his recollections about events surrounding the President’s direction to have the Special Counsel removed, despite the President’s multiple demands that he do so.
Turdacious
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm
Re: What to make of the election?
Post by Grandpa's Spells »
There's no honest accounting of the Mueller Report that makes that case.Turdacious wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2019 5:02 amMueller is saying that the Orange One running his mouth on Twitter and venting in meetings doesn't meet obstruction standards.
Grandpa's Spells
-
Topic author - Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21342
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
- Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan
Re: What to make of the election?
Post by Turdacious »
Turdacious