The couch thread

Stayfq · Post by **Stayfq** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 11:22 pm

I thought he was going to do some clean pulls with that shit, and then he fucking got under the bar and I

Fucking kudos on the thick blond a few posts up. Love me some muscular legs.

Hugo · Post by **Hugo** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 11:32 pm

Gin Master wrote:

All very cleansing, but what's her Fran time?

Fat Cat · Post by **Fat Cat** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 11:38 pm

Elliot Sands · Post by **Elliot Sands** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 12:00 am

l-tree wrote:Abi

The dynamax atlas stone pic

sanchezero · Post by **sanchezero** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 1:19 am

that's what i wanna know! is it really a 30#med ball or some shit like that? if so, is she lifting it like that as if it were the pvc version an atlas stone or is she genuinely that weak?

Alfred_E._Neuman · Post by **Alfred_E._Neuman** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 1:22 am

sanchezero wrote:

that's what i wanna know! is it really a 30#med ball or some shit like that? if so, is she lifting it like that as if it were the pvc version an atlas stone or is she genuinely that weak?

I've met her. It's the real deal. She competes in strongman.

Jesse Ward, the owner of Lynwood Crossfit, competes in strongman and PL.

Their gym produces some seriously strong people.

T-L · Post by **T-L** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 1:38 am

Alfred_E._Neuman wrote:
sanchezero wrote:

that's what i wanna know! is it really a 30#med ball or some shit like that? if so, is she lifting it like that as if it were the pvc version an atlas stone or is she genuinely that weak?
I've met her. It's the real deal. She competes in strongman.

Jesse Ward, the owner of Lynwood Crossfit, competes in strongman and PL.

Their gym produces some seriously strong people.

Real deal.... here is another. Bad ass...

T-L · Post by **T-L** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 1:43 am

Fuckin interwebz. Edit double post

friedquads · Post by **friedquads** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 1:49 am

Alfred_E._Neuman wrote:I've met her. It's the real deal. She competes in strongman.

Jesse Ward, the owner of Lynwood Crossfit, competes in strongman and PL.

Their gym produces some seriously strong people.

Strong people for sure, but he's a pretty loud cheerleader for @Fit on his blog and ridicules everyone else that isn't doing @Fit.

There is also a considerable lack of MILF's and hot chicks in general on his site.

T-L · Post by **T-L** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 1:56 am

Alyssa

T-L · Post by **T-L** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:04 am

Shari

Anon · Post by **Anon** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:09 am

Enough is enough...

We need someone to to create the Not-so-Official 2010 @ssfit @ndro C@[email protected] course for satire purposes only, free DL from the IGx

WildGorillaMan · Post by **WildGorillaMan** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:26 am

Excellent work there, l-tree and all.

POD · Post by **POD** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 3:31 am

The thread noting the absence of nutrition certifications has been locked.
http://board.crossfit.com/showthread.php?t=54393

Of note is this post:

Today, 05:15 AM #8
Darryl Shaw
Member

Profile:
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Manchester England
Posts: 346
Re: Nutrition Certs
If there are no nutrition certs at the moment you might all want to consider investing $25.61 on a copy of The Complete Guide to Sports Nutrition by Anita Bean YOU MUST ANNOTATE ALL LINKS WHETHER WORK AND FAMILY SAFE. then you could buy some new equipment or something with the money you've saved.

It's more than Lynne just bitching more about links again. There's no note at the bottom saying "This post last edited by..." meaning that she can now edit posts to clip "offensive" content, all without letting the sheeple ever know.

Also, do you think anyone who has asked to have their account deleted, only for it to be marked as "Departed" has any grounds for legal action against CrossFit Inc.? The account may (arguably) belong to CrossFit Inc., but the person's full legal name (and city of residence located directly below) most certainly does not.

Anon · Post by **Anon** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 3:35 am

A legit business would allow you to expunge all of your contributions upon departing.

The high moral and ethical standards of @ssfit make this an impossibility.

Jag Panzer · Post by **Jag Panzer** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 3:37 am

POD wrote:The thread noting the absence of nutrition certifications has been locked.
http://board.crossfit.com/showthread.php?t=54393

Of note is this post:
Today, 05:15 AM #8
Darryl Shaw
Member

Profile:
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Manchester England
Posts: 346
Re: Nutrition Certs
If there are no nutrition certs at the moment you might all want to consider investing $25.61 on a copy of The Complete Guide to Sports Nutrition by Anita Bean YOU MUST ANNOTATE ALL LINKS WHETHER WORK AND FAMILY SAFE. then you could buy some new equipment or something with the money you've saved.
It's more than Lynne just bitching more about links again. There's no note at the bottom saying "This post last edited by..." meaning that she can now edit posts to clip "offensive" content, all without letting the sheeple ever know.

So it only took dyke-ass Lynn what, 5, 6 years to learn how to use the vBulletin admin panel? Good for her. With quality tech people like that, your censored community of bullshit can't go wrong.

Also, do you think anyone who has asked to have their account deleted, only for it to be marked as "Departed" has any grounds for legal action against CrossFit Inc.? The account may (arguably) belong to CrossFit Inc., but the person's full legal name (and city of residence located directly below) most certainly does not.

I'd bet that reading the TOS would pretty much rule that out.

T-L · Post by **T-L** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 3:43 am

POD wrote:The thread noting the absence of nutrition certifications has been locked.
http://board.crossfit.com/showthread.php?t=54393

Of note is this post:
Today, 05:15 AM #8
Darryl Shaw
Member

Profile:
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Manchester England
Posts: 346
Re: Nutrition Certs
If there are no nutrition certs at the moment you might all want to consider investing $25.61 on a copy of The Complete Guide to Sports Nutrition by Anita Bean YOU MUST ANNOTATE ALL LINKS WHETHER WORK AND FAMILY SAFE. then you could buy some new equipment or something with the money you've saved.
It's more than Lynne just bitching more about links again. There's no note at the bottom saying "This post last edited by..." meaning that she can now edit posts to clip "offensive" content, all without letting the sheeple ever know.

Also, do you think anyone who has asked to have their account deleted, only for it to be marked as "Departed" has any grounds for legal action against CrossFit Inc.? The account may (arguably) belong to CrossFit Inc., but the person's full legal name (and city of residence located directly below) most certainly does not.

Wonder how long it will be until couch calls RW back begging.

Botototo · Post by **Botototo** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 3:46 am

l-tree wrote:Abi

Oh, really? Really? No offense as she seems strong, but can we at least pretend these theings are actually in balance?

Mountebank · Post by **Mountebank** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 4:21 am

Botototo wrote:
l-tree wrote:Abi

Oh, really? Really? No offense as she seems strong, but can we at least pretend these theings are actually in balance?

There are several options here.

Is she within 18 degrees off of vertical? (20% slop)

Is she performing more work than a 6-year-old boy, thus making shite form acceptable to couch?

Can @F re-name the exercise, thus rendering their own form and standards? (ie. NONE) Like the Gaymes snatch, it could be called a "two feet off the ground anyhow".

Maybe @Fers are now doing their handstands "for time"...shortest time wins.

All are acceptable to cult members, you know...

POD · Post by **POD** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 4:37 am

Quack Attack, that's good shit.

Jag, the forum "AUP" states that a users posts shall remain.

http://board.crossfit.com/rules.php
14. Any messages you post in these discussion forums will remain available to the public for as long as this discussion board is online. Once you have posted your message, it will stay online. Please post carefully and with due consideration to the content of your post.

It doesn't say anything about the accounts. Those "Departed" accounts are certainly still there, as there's a clear difference between them and those that were truly deleted. Leaving up a skeleton of the old account for other CrossFitters to see when reading old threads could be taken as an attempt to stick these former members' heads on a pike for all to see. That could have needless and entirely unwarranted effects on someone's reputation in real life, especially when the city of residence remains on the posts so that users can be readily identified. I'm not sure CrossFit has the right to do that after the members specifically asked to have their accounts deleted, not disabled. The two things are very different.

I'm sure that, in time, someone will be subjected to either physical assault or vandalism because of anti-CrossFit comments made online. Some CrossFitters are just that bent. (As long as there's no weapon involved, the result of such a physical altercation could actually be pretty funny.)

Edit: Wait, fuck. It's already happened. Asstro and Everett! Hahahah! And that was funny!

Another interesting rule on their forums.

http://board.crossfit.com/rules.php
5. Examples of inappropriate posts are those that are massively off-subject or exist solely to advertise a product; contain pornography, obscene material, racist material, any hate group material, materials promoting violence, threats or illegal acts; disparage CrossFit Inc., its employees, its management and marketing system, or its training protocol in any way or that can be construed to do such etc. Any such postings will result in immediate and permanent banishment of the poster.

Ok, ok, I admit, I added some text to that quote, but it didn't change the thing's meaning at all.

Anon · Post by **Anon** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 5:44 am

POD wrote:I am still butthurt.

POD · Post by **POD** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:03 am

No, I simply haven't seen anything lately that's really caused my blood to boil, so I'm only making general comments and observations on CrossFit. That's really all there is for me to say, since I don't contribute to the Andro Friday posts either.

I agree that my last post was probably too long-winded though; too much thought put into a topic that doesn't warrant it.

Beelzebub · Post by **Beelzebub** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:31 am

POD - so you are like the Barry Cooper for gays? Does that make you Fairy Cockgobler? Not taking part in Andro Fridays...gay.

PkC · Post by **PkC** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 8:17 am

Crossfit never really got ahold of Parkour because doing crossfit is stupid for traceurs, bathing your muscle in lactic acid for 30 minutes strangely doesn't help you jump higher or farther or make you faster, and doing umpteen million pull ups tends to fuck shoulders and elbows in a way unconducive to climbing actual building.

On the flipside every Crossfitter I ever talked to about parkour was to worried they would get hurt if they tried parkour and it would f-up their quest to beat their fran PR.

Full disclosure I was one of the traceurs dumb enough to experiment with Crossfit, at least it introduced me to Rippetoes material.

Stayfq · Post by **Stayfq** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 8:43 am

[quote="Beelzebub"][/quote]

Goddamn please tell me you have more of her.

IGX

The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread