The couch thread

Topics without replies are pruned every 365 days. Not moderated.

Moderator: Dux

User avatar

Yes I Have Balls
Top
Posts: 2431
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
Location: Wherever they's a fight so hungry people can eat

Re: The couch thread

Post by Yes I Have Balls »

How do I get free equipment for a year and a half to run a box? Is this a new program HQ has? or is that just a program for our "friends"?
Comment #40 - Posted by: V at March 4, 2010 10:41 AM

Is Tony Blauer involved in this? It is in the same place as Blauer Tactical.
Comment #41 - Posted by: Jack at March 4, 2010 10:42 AM
There have been some decent points made in those deleted posts. They're around, if anyone is interested.
Comment #41 - Posted by: scott at March 4, 2010 10:45 AM
My post was not mean-spirited, impolite or nonsensical. Why was it deleted. I believe the question I raised at the very least should be allowed to stay on the board.
Comment #41 - Posted by: Christopher at March 4, 2010 10:46 AM


dakat

Re: The couch thread

Post by dakat »

Christ, they're deleting posts fast over there. What a bunch of pussies. How does Dale Saran get any work done with couch's cock in his mouth that deep?


ab g-d
Top
Posts: 2335
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 1:39 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by ab g-d »

As the former Chief of Economic Crime I can tell you unequivicollly they are both lying.

In every case where the parties were in businesses together, as opposed to say an internet fraud scheme where their might actually be an "innocent victim", both parties lied to us when they proferred. In almost every case the victim was perfectly happy with what they knew was a sketchy deal until said sketchy deal went sour on them, at which time they became the victim.
Growing old is not for sissies.

"I'm just here to regulate funkyness"
James Gandolfini in The Mexican


kitosho
Sarge
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 6:09 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by kitosho »

I see a potential for future uprising / mutiny. Any way we can throw some napalm on this situation? It would be just fantastic if this thread played a part in the inevitable downfall of CF.
THE END IS NIGH

User avatar

Yes I Have Balls
Top
Posts: 2431
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
Location: Wherever they's a fight so hungry people can eat

Re: The couch thread

Post by Yes I Have Balls »

Dale, why "R or J or whatever"? You have access to the deleted posts, you know exactly who you're replying to in each case.
Comment #44 - Posted by: JCVD at March 4, 2010 11:01 AM


dakat

Re: The couch thread

Post by dakat »

Today's main page video transcription, couch at the chalkboard:

Bony Pudding: Can you explain a little bit of what is that mechanism going on where we push and correct and hold back . . .

Couch: It’s a thresh . . . it’s a threshold phenomena asmuchasicannahoho . . . overload concept forozo those old Weider d-d-days fans you know Muscle and Fitness . . .um I I’m a I’m taking a physiological parameter and I’m stressing it . . and uh its . . its . . control. And both neurologically and muscularly there’s an adaptation and response to that and its increased control at a at a at a reduced or same intensity. Its uh its uh at the heart too of every human endeavor where uh velocity is a critical complement, of course speed and movement is vital. Whether you are talking about thoracic surgery or typing or uh any any motor sport, you know, where going fast without crashing is inherently valuable. What you find is a tension between error and movement and the uh much uh prized uh velocity.

Solid gold.

User avatar

GoDogGo!
IGX Honorary Lesbian
Posts: 11208
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 1:10 am
Location: Casa de Culo

Re: The couch thread

Post by GoDogGo! »

I like the 5-high stack of books on "Legal Malpractice."
The flesh is weak, and the smell of pussy is strong like a muthafucka.

User avatar

theoverman
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 253
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 8:36 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by theoverman »

kitosho wrote:I see a potential for future uprising / mutiny. Any way we can throw some napalm on this situation? It would be just fantastic if this thread played a part in the inevitable downfall of CF.
then where will i unleash my hate?
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.
riff raff fanclub president

User avatar

Yes I Have Balls
Top
Posts: 2431
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
Location: Wherever they's a fight so hungry people can eat

Re: The couch thread

Post by Yes I Have Balls »

Ok...I think I get the process now..unless you are supportive of Crossfit you don't get posted. "Go Crossfit!!!" Oh, wait you did like thieves in the night. See now it's just fun.
Comment #44 - Posted by: What truth at March 4, 2010 11:13 AM
So the equipment was put in Tony Blauer's place which became CrossFit Obsession and then was taken out of what is still Tony Blauer's place? Or is that Luke Hillier's place?
Comment #44 - Posted by: Jack at March 4, 2010 11:21 AM
The Gym is definitely not gone. Just got brand new equipment delivered today. We'll be doing the same thing we were doing before just without the name CrossFit. Big deal. It's just a name. So congrats on accomplishing absolutely nothing. Oh and by the way, employee memberships were paid for by Luke/ADS. Man, what a horrible place to work.
Comment #45 - Posted by: gym at March 4, 2010 11:21 AM
Dale_Saran

With all due respect I would just like to clarify that there were individuals such as myself who paid for our memberships to Crossfit Obsession.
It was not a "freebie gym" to us.
Comment #44 - Posted by: Travis at March 4, 2010 11:23 AM

The freebies not gone. The new equipment is coming in today. The gym will be back up and running before B&A can even unload the equipment they took.
Comment #45 - Posted by: j at March 4, 2010 11:23 AM
Last edited by Yes I Have Balls on Thu Mar 04, 2010 7:25 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar

friedquads
Pillowbiter
Posts: 1782
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:50 am

Re: The couch thread

Post by friedquads »

ab g-d wrote:As the former Chief of Economic Crime I can tell you unequivicollly they are both lying.

In every case where the parties were in businesses together, as opposed to say an internet fraud scheme where their might actually be an "innocent victim", both parties lied to us when they proferred. In almost every case the victim was perfectly happy with what they knew was a sketchy deal until said sketchy deal went sour on them, at which time they became the victim.

So with your experience, do you think this is going to actually see a court room? I'm sure a court reporter is going to have a difficult time trying to translate Couch-speak into something that resembles the English language if Glass-hole takes the stand.
Jay wrote:BTW, warriors kill shit. The only things you kill are exercise science and the board short display at Target.
I choose to kill people with kindness. Oh, I should also mention "kindness" is the name of my samurai sword.


ab g-d
Top
Posts: 2335
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 1:39 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by ab g-d »

friedquads wrote:
ab g-d wrote:As the former Chief of Economic Crime I can tell you unequivicollly they are both lying.

In every case where the parties were in businesses together, as opposed to say an internet fraud scheme where their might actually be an "innocent victim", both parties lied to us when they proferred. In almost every case the victim was perfectly happy with what they knew was a sketchy deal until said sketchy deal went sour on them, at which time they became the victim.

So with your experience, do you think this is going to actually see a court room? I'm sure a court reporter is going to have a difficult time trying to translate Couch-speak into something that resembles the English language if Glass-hole takes the stand.
Not nearly enough info. Probably a bunch of handshakes, nothing enforceable. I'm sure Couch is the only one with bucks to get a decent lawyer.
Growing old is not for sissies.

"I'm just here to regulate funkyness"
James Gandolfini in The Mexican

User avatar

Yes I Have Balls
Top
Posts: 2431
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
Location: Wherever they's a fight so hungry people can eat

Re: The couch thread

Post by Yes I Have Balls »

Dale Saran wrote:The gear was actually at Tony Blauer's place for HQ's use for certs and seminars at Blauer tactical - well before B&A got to VA Beach or CF Obsession even existed. Tony was in a dispute/settlement over ownership of Blauer Tactical with Luke Hillier and we (HQ) left the gear there at Tony's request until things settled out. During that time, B applied for affilation, was approved, and began training at CFO. In a colloquial sense, the gear was "loaned", though not really - this all happened without HQ's input initially.
So, couch gave the equipment to Blauer NOT B-boy. Then, when Hillier started acting like a douche, HQ took the equipment from a location rented by Hillier?? HQ was not invovled? Then where did all the money for that new equipment come from?

WTF??

User avatar

Yes I Have Balls
Top
Posts: 2431
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
Location: Wherever they's a fight so hungry people can eat

Re: The couch thread

Post by Yes I Have Balls »

The bottom line is a issue between Luke and Tony. You people keep talking about the gym. It was never about the gym Brendan or Allison. Nobody was going to steal your equipment. If that was the case, post the letter with the time and date sent! Tony needed to get back at Luke for some reason and the only way was to destroy CFO. He got his buddy at CF and his Minion trainers B&A to follow. In the end, he did a great job. If he put as much into Blauer Tactical as he did trying to destroy CFO, we wouldn't be in this position.

P.S. I laugh when you delete every Pro Hillier comment.
Comment #45 - Posted by: joe L at March 4, 2010 11:28 AM
Crossfitobsession website is no longer working.


justpassingthrough
Corporal
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:53 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by justpassingthrough »

But it lives on in Google cache:
http://74.125.113.132/search?q=cache:O0 ... n/2009/07/
Keep in mind that not only is Luke a great Crossfit Athlete but when there is a competition on the line he will kill himself making sure he wins.
Couch vs. Hillier: Round 1

User avatar

Shafpocalypse Now
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21385
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:26 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by Shafpocalypse Now »

So, this is more of Couch pandering to the Military-Industrial complex in an attempt to get a foot in the door of the military. The military will not pay for PT, and many locations don't seem to care if you do XF as part of your PT.

I'm sure Couch loved giving Blauer and Hillier that stuff because they brought in even more soldiers to do XF, and we know Couch has an immense boner for the Military. Now that it went sour, Couch wants to take his toys and give it to old Fingercuffs and Highfive.

User avatar

T200
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 5434
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 1:38 am
Location: House of Fire

Re: The couch thread

Post by T200 »

This is not the least bit interesting to me but I will say this: How the fuck can Virginia Beach support that much @Fitting?

What percent douchier must it be than the Jersey Shore? WTF

Fuck Virginia Beach is the thesis. I hope a hurricane takes out the whole fucking joint.
Image


Neandraphuck
Recruit
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 1:56 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by Neandraphuck »

T200 wrote: How the fuck can Virginia Beach support that much @Fitting? .
Shit load of MIL in VAB.

User avatar

theoverman
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 253
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 8:36 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by theoverman »

A cryptic shot from Mr. Tate there at the end???


Image


Image
riff raff fanclub president

User avatar

A1A BA
Manrammer, 2nd Rate
Posts: 103
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 5:52 pm
Location: A1A South

Re: The couch thread

Post by A1A BA »

VA Beach = Uber-Tacticles :butthead:
Image A bird with one wing can't fly.

User avatar

RPC
Sarge
Posts: 128
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 1:20 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by RPC »

R - (or J or whatever).

Here is the fallacy in your point and the part you've failed to address: We didn't choose to have this happen and we didn't get exactly a lot of notice ourselves. That we found out about the internal plans to take our gear was entirely serendipitous - in short, we either removed the gear or we risked losing control over it. Here's the other fallacy - that we're the bad guys because we didn't consider the disruption to the clients. We (like Brendan and Allison) care about the clients. That's why B&A remain in good standing with us and we're hopeful they're going to get up and running again shortly. They're the trainers - not Luke Hillier. That Luke Hillier gave away free memberships and people are miffed because their freebie gym is gone is not our problem, quite frankly. Notice would have meant locks changed, B&A gone, and us without our gear. That we were supposed to give 'notice' to the people who were surreptitiously planning to make some bogus legal claim about a non-existent lease is funny, to me.

Next (to the poster complaining about CF HQ setting up B&A) - it didn't go down like that. The gear was actually at Tony Blauer's place for HQ's use for certs and seminars at Blauer tactical - well before B&A got to VA Beach or CF Obsession even existed. Tony was in a dispute/settlement over ownership of Blauer Tactical with Luke Hillier and we (HQ) left the gear there at Tony's request until things settled out. During that time, B applied for affilation, was approved, and began training at CFO. In a colloquial sense, the gear was "loaned", though not really - this all happened without HQ's input initially.

Notwithstanding all of this, we've tried to make lemonade with lemons. Tony Blauer is our friend - he does great things in his area of expertise. B&A are great trainers - that's at the heart of CF Obsession's success - not some financial backer. People don't get great fitness because some guy gives away memberships - people get(got) results because of B&A's professional acumen as trainers.

Funny how that principle gets lost because someone got their freebie taken away.

Comment #42 - Posted by: Dale_Saran at March 4, 2010 10:57 AM
So that made me check with Virginia on Blauer's business which yeilded this:
LLC ID: S229813- 3
LLC STATUS: 00 ACTIVE
LLC NAME: Blauer Tactical Systems USA, LLC
CURRENT REGISTERED AGENT: NAME: CHARLES M SALLE
STREET: 477 VIKING DR STE 350 CITY: VIRGINIA BEACH STATE: VA ZIP: 23452-0000 STATUS: 4 MEMBER OF EFF DATE: 07/19/07 LOC: 228 VIRGINIA BEACH CITY OLD REGISTERED AGENT: NAME: STREET: CITY: STATE: ZIP: STATUS: EFF DATE LOC:


Wondering who Charles Salle is I googled: Charles Salle + Luke Hillier which hit on this:
Mr. Charles M. Salle (ADS Inc./VP/Gen. Counsel),
So all in all Luke Hillier, Charles Salle, and Tony Blauer were all in bed together at some point. Tony lets CrossFit use his place for a few certs which never really panned out, then BBoi and Allison move in and use the equipment which was essentially abandoned by CF (probably forgotten by the drunken master).

Blah blah blah. You know the rest.

User avatar

GoDogGo!
IGX Honorary Lesbian
Posts: 11208
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 1:10 am
Location: Casa de Culo

Re: The couch thread

Post by GoDogGo! »

Andro Friday can't get here fast enough.
The flesh is weak, and the smell of pussy is strong like a muthafucka.

User avatar

stosh
Sgt. Major
Posts: 3998
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 12:46 am
Location: Motorin' around the South

Re: The couch thread

Post by stosh »

AbG-d needs to pull a Grisham and become an author and write a novel called The Box about all these intriguey and espionagey goings-on with a gin-blossomed fitness guru and big-name defense contractors and chub-boobed trainers and assorted wiggers and back-alley dealers named Ana and Andy and then at the end there'd be an epic battle between Rmax, Xfit, and DD-trained Special Forces doods. That'd be kewl.
A novice is someone who keeps asking himself if he is a novice. An intermediate is someone who is sick of training with weak people and an advanced person doesn't give a shit anymore. - Jim Wendler

User avatar

Yes I Have Balls
Top
Posts: 2431
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
Location: Wherever they's a fight so hungry people can eat

Re: The couch thread

Post by Yes I Have Balls »

I think Louise just put it all to rest. Brendan and Allison will be ok. CrossFit will continue to be succesful. Being a succesful businessman does not mean you are ruthless or a bad person (Luke Hillier). It's not about the equipment and both sides of this argument know it. It sucks for the former members of CFO, but you all haven't done your last kettlebell swings, now have you?

CrossFit is protecting it's affiliates by upholding a standard of value (widely-accepted monthly member fees). Is this price-fixing (negative) or is it perpetuation of a great business (positive)?

The owners of CrossFit Obsession wanted to offer a lower price-point (annual fee of 60 dollars per month) which is only possible if you have access to an awesome facility like Blauer Tactical.

For those of you who don't know, Blauer Tactical is basically an amusement park for mil/leo/mma/cf'ers. It is awesome. Let's not forget: the 2009 regional qualifiers were held there.

How many affiliates could hold a sectional/regional qualifer IN THIER BOX? Additionally, not all boxes have this opportunity, and not all boxes could support the amount of members CFO had (upwards of 450). So if you had a huge facility, you could feasibly drop the membership fee and bring in more clients. Is this ruthless business practice? No.

Does CFHQ want to avoid this type of thing happening due to quality-control issues? Of course. Can you blame either side?


This is an anomaly, an isolated situation of differing perspectives. Both sides have their points. This will probably not go further than dorks like us posting comments in this forum.

Everyone shut up and go do some deadlifts. If you are a (former) CFO member you don't have equipment right now so, rally together and deadlift Hillier's baby-blue Ferrari.

Comment #46 - Posted by: the guy next to Tino at March 4, 2010 1:18 PM
Hold up there sparky. HQ can step in in you charge too LITTLE? Sounds a lot like franchise control to me.

User avatar

Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21342
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

Re: The couch thread

Post by Turdacious »

stosh wrote:AbG-d needs to pull a Grisham and become an author and write a novel called The Box about all these intriguey and espionagey goings-on with a gin-blossomed fitness guru and big-name defense contractors and chub-boobed trainers and assorted wiggers and back-alley dealers named Ana and Andy and then at the end there'd be an epic battle between Rmax, Xfit, and DD-trained Special Forces doods. That'd be kewl.
The book would be about 2 pages of text and 269 pages of shirtless pictures.
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule


T-L

Re: The couch thread

Post by T-L »

Yes I Have Balls wrote:
I think Louise just put it all to rest. Brendan and Allison will be ok. CrossFit will continue to be succesful. Being a succesful businessman does not mean you are ruthless or a bad person (Luke Hillier). It's not about the equipment and both sides of this argument know it. It sucks for the former members of CFO, but you all haven't done your last kettlebell swings, now have you?

CrossFit is protecting it's affiliates by upholding a standard of value (widely-accepted monthly member fees). Is this price-fixing (negative) or is it perpetuation of a great business (positive)?

The owners of CrossFit Obsession wanted to offer a lower price-point (annual fee of 60 dollars per month) which is only possible if you have access to an awesome facility like Blauer Tactical.

For those of you who don't know, Blauer Tactical is basically an amusement park for mil/leo/mma/cf'ers. It is awesome. Let's not forget: the 2009 regional qualifiers were held there.

How many affiliates could hold a sectional/regional qualifer IN THIER BOX? Additionally, not all boxes have this opportunity, and not all boxes could support the amount of members CFO had (upwards of 450). So if you had a huge facility, you could feasibly drop the membership fee and bring in more clients. Is this ruthless business practice? No.

Does CFHQ want to avoid this type of thing happening due to quality-control issues? Of course. Can you blame either side?


This is an anomaly, an isolated situation of differing perspectives. Both sides have their points. This will probably not go further than dorks like us posting comments in this forum.

Everyone shut up and go do some deadlifts. If you are a (former) CFO member you don't have equipment right now so, rally together and deadlift Hillier's baby-blue Ferrari.

Comment #46 - Posted by: the guy next to Tino at March 4, 2010 1:18 PM
Hold up there sparky. HQ can step in in you charge too LITTLE? Sounds a lot like franchise control to me.
LMFAO at Quality Control. @FHQ could care less about Quality. What they were seeing was a large facility have too many members and @FHQ (the gin fund) was not being properly fed.

Post Reply