The couch thread

WildGorillaMan · Post by **WildGorillaMan** » Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:39 am

Some people are scandalized when @fit Mainpage runs a topless back shot. HQ of course revels in that because they dig being edgy, and controversial. And let's face it, pictures of topless chicks garner way more interest and comments that are either outraged or supportive than wordy, poorly thought out libertarian diatribes.

Well, topless back shots are commonplace now. Today, Team Gorilla brings you sideboob.

http://wildgorillaman.blogspot.com/2011 ... ustra.html

Your move, Mainpage.

Testiclaw · Post by **Testiclaw** » Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:19 pm

That could have ended...badly.

And, WGM, be honest: has any @fit chick sent you a picture of some full blown titties? No names, I just need confirmation for my fantasy.

Hymen Asshole · Post by **Hymen Asshole** » Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:36 pm

Thanks WGM, lovely way to start Friday with a raging hardon

tough old man · Post by **tough old man** » Fri Sep 09, 2011 2:18 pm

Retardation from @fit SicFit

TerryB · Post by **TerryB** » Fri Sep 09, 2011 3:01 pm

WildGorillaMan wrote:Some people are scandalized when @fit Mainpage runs a topless back shot. HQ of course revels in that because they dig being edgy, and controversial. And let's face it, pictures of topless chicks garner way more interest and comments that are either outraged or supportive than wordy, poorly thought out libertarian diatribes.

Well, topless back shots are commonplace now. Today, Team Gorilla brings you sideboob.

http://wildgorillaman.blogspot.com/2011 ... ustra.html

Your move, Mainpage.

I can't get through that page w/ all those stupid ads sliding onto the pictures.

What is this? Amateur hour?

Spend some fucking dough to eliminate those stupids ads, WGM.

Signed,

URS Truly!

Beer Jew · Post by **Beer Jew** » Fri Sep 09, 2011 4:34 pm

Fuck, this ruined Fridays update for me.

Shapecharge · Post by **Shapecharge** » Fri Sep 09, 2011 4:49 pm

protobuilder wrote:
WildGorillaMan wrote:Some people are scandalized when @fit Mainpage runs a topless back shot. HQ of course revels in that because they dig being edgy, and controversial. And let's face it, pictures of topless chicks garner way more interest and comments that are either outraged or supportive than wordy, poorly thought out libertarian diatribes.

Well, topless back shots are commonplace now. Today, Team Gorilla brings you sideboob.

http://wildgorillaman.blogspot.com/2011 ... ustra.html

Your move, Mainpage.
I can't get through that page w/ all those stupid ads sliding onto the pictures.

Hey WGM I realize you gotta pay for shit and make a little cash but I've gotta agree with Frodo. I have a hard time looking through a posting of hot andro pussy because of the ads popping up on each pic. And it's difficult to rub one out with one hand and click on that tiny little "x" to close the ad with the other hand especially when I'm holding a magnifying glass and tweezers.

What is this? Amateur hour?

Spend some fucking dough to eliminate those stupids ads, WGM.

Signed,

URS Truly!

Yes I Have Balls · Post by **Yes I Have Balls** » Fri Sep 09, 2011 6:26 pm

The Beer Jew wrote:Fuck, this ruined Fridays update for me.

Exactly. Stop showing pictures of this cunt until she accomplishes something either on the platform or in the looks 'department.'

Thanks

Turdacious · Post by **Turdacious** » Fri Sep 09, 2011 6:34 pm

There is so much wrong with that picture. Paul Anderson could lift that while he was still in the womb.

lesser_rebelangel · Post by **lesser_rebelangel** » Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:30 pm

Yes I Have Balls wrote:
The Beer Jew wrote:Fuck, this ruined Fridays update for me.

Exactly. Stop showing pictures of this cunt until she accomplishes something either on the platform or in the looks 'department.'

Thanks

At least Nafod is a dem-bootlicking faggot and the product of an anal birth.

Shapecharge · Post by **Shapecharge** » Fri Sep 09, 2011 8:21 pm

I never really bought into the notion that it's cool to beat a woman but for some reason just looking at this chick and reading some of the shit she's written makes me think I need to re-evaluate this idea.

friedquads · Post by **friedquads** » Fri Sep 09, 2011 9:01 pm

I think the Gorilla is a few steps away from a handful of andro broads wanting to do full frontal, so long as their faces are blurred out.

dead man walking · Post by **dead man walking** » Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:36 pm

i'm supposed to be impressed by sideboob? in the 21st century on the internet?

WildGorillaMan · Post by **WildGorillaMan** » Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:22 am

tough old man wrote:Retardation from @fit SicFit

Really? Bumpers on fire? Is that all that dude has up his sleeve? In this day and age that doesn't even raise an eyebrow. Unless he had a baby in a Nomex suit strapped to each one that's not exactly Eeleet.

WildGorillaMan · Post by **WildGorillaMan** » Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:28 am

Hey!

http://www.thecouchthread.com/

A board for bitching that's bitching about a board for bitching. How clever. Very pataphysical of them. Still, all other analysis of @fit, not to mention meta-analysis of @fit is still, at best, footnotes to the couch thread.

E for Effort, though.

dead man walking · Post by **dead man walking** » Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:32 am

wgm

you know the rule with this sophisticated audience: tits or gtfo

Holland Oates · Post by **Holland Oates** » Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:39 am

WildGorillaMan wrote:Hey!

http://www.thecouchthread.com/

A board for bitching that's bitching about a board for bitching. How clever. Very pataphysical of them. Still, all other analysis of @fit, not to mention meta-analysis of @fit is still, at best, footnotes to the couch thread.

E for Effort, though.

That's a whole lot of stupid faggot right there.

baffled · Post by **baffled** » Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:02 am

WildGorillaMan wrote:Hey!

http://www.thecouchthread.com/

A board for bitching that's bitching about a board for bitching. How clever. Very pataphysical of them. Still, all other analysis of @fit, not to mention meta-analysis of @fit is still, at best, footnotes to the couch thread.

E for Effort, though.

What the fuck? Is that a place for people to say shit they wouldn't at Pmenu in the CFJ thread, but don't have the stones to take their lumps over here?

ThespianDouche · Post by **ThespianDouche** » Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:03 am

Just more shit for us to rag on.

Powerlifter54,

THey called you out. By the way, who thinks a 135 lb OHS for guy is impressive?

Shafpocalypse Now · Post by **Shafpocalypse Now** » Sat Sep 10, 2011 3:13 am

Well yeah, dumbass. When they put an enormous fucking billboard of her looking like she just got fucked on a rooftop by the approach to LAX, I'd say yes, Reebok was expecting to create a marketing campaign around a woman with a physique like hers.

It's like couch thread light! Great taste but less filling.

Awesome.

Shafpocalypse Now · Post by **Shafpocalypse Now** » Sat Sep 10, 2011 3:16 am

Reebok will pick who they want for the marketing not based upon who's the champ, it's who looks best. This year, expect to see a Reebok commercial where Froning and Camille (not Thorisdottir) are fucking after a metcon. Glassman in the corner, wanking.

If Camille isn't crying because she lost to a 13 Year Old boy, she is crying about losing to Ivan Drago's Nordic training partner. Sorry, Camille, next year Rebecca "Robert" Voigt will beat you and you'll go 3 for 3 for not winning. I suppose the Canadians might be awesome at Ice Road Trucking, but not winning exercise competitions.

I gotta say, these fuckers aren't messing around. They are making the couch thread fun again. Plus you know they are weak bitch hipsters with ironic facial hair, v-neck American Apparel Ts, and fixies.

Shafpocalypse Now · Post by **Shafpocalypse Now** » Sat Sep 10, 2011 3:31 am

They must be bored in Brea, eh?

Damien · Post by **Damien** » Sat Sep 10, 2011 7:11 am

Shafman wrote:They must be bored in Brea, eh?

California is nice this time of the year...

TerryB · Post by **TerryB** » Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:47 am

ThespianDouche wrote:By the way, who thinks a 135 lb OHS for guy is impressive?

People who are new to weightlifting and/or serious athletic training.

Jay · Post by **Jay** » Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:05 pm

that couchthread.com thing is pretty funny, but it offers nothing but making fun of this place really.

IGX

The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread

Re: The couch thread