Page 1 of 1
Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2016 4:13 am
by Shafpocalypse Now
PA husband prescribing medicine for wife, kids, and self?
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2016 4:17 am
by Testiclaw
Family members can be sketchy, depending.
Himself? Bad juju.
Source: MD buddy I just texted at University Hospital.
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2016 4:23 am
by Shafpocalypse Now
Yeah...some sketchy shit going on...was reading up on how it's highly suggested not to prescribe shit for your family
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2016 4:37 am
by Blaidd Drwg
Shafpocalypse Now wrote:Yeah...some sketchy shit going on...was reading up on how it's highly suggested not to prescribe shit for your family
I have a buddy who is a GP in a scandanavian country. He prescribes his mother arimidex and then uses it himself when he's on cycle.
Seems totally legit to me
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2016 5:24 am
by Schlegel
Oh, yeah. Family is iffy, self is a big no no.
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2016 9:01 pm
by syaigh
My husband wont even prescribe us antibiotics. DEA has really cracked down.
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2016 9:21 pm
by Shafpocalypse Now
Meh. I'm at the point where I want to say something to them about it, but it'll probably make me a pariah.
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2016 9:22 pm
by Shafpocalypse Now
I have two physician neighbors, and ER guy and an OBGYN, neither will prescribe or treat family unless it's an emergency.
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2016 9:35 pm
by climber511
I imagine it makes a difference what medication it is - some things I would think throw up bigger red flags than others. Probably not a good idea overall though.
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2016 9:38 pm
by Bud Charniga's grape ape
I'm a lawyer not a doctor; representing yourself may get you some "fool for a client" jokes but is basically nbd.
Representing family, though, is firmly in That's A Terrible Idea wtf Are You Thinking territory
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2016 10:39 pm
by Dunn
Z-pak, meh. But that is so simple to get that it's pointless to do so. Anything else, screw that.
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2016 11:02 pm
by Beer Jew
An OBGYN treating a family member would just be weird.
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2016 11:15 pm
by Testiclaw
Dunn wrote:Z-pak, meh. But that is so simple to get that it's pointless to do so. Anything else, screw that.
Oh, God, the squirts on the Zpak were mindblowing.
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2016 2:46 am
by judobrian
Most medical boards allow for "time limited illness" - prescribing a course of antibiotics, or anti-puke meds. But long term meds should be handled by an objective 3rd party. Controlled substances - no frickin' way.
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:24 am
by Shafpocalypse Now
adderall and xanax...fun stuff.
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2016 4:38 am
by TerryB
It's probably a good thing I don't have a medical license.
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:11 am
by Bud Charniga's grape ape
TerryB wrote:It's probably a good thing I don't have a medical license.
truer words...
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:23 am
by buckethead
SAR prescribed me some meds right here over IGx.
But I then had a short jewish erection for 4 hours, so I had to stop
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:49 pm
by Shafpocalypse Now
Lulz
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:36 am
by judobrian
Shafpocalypse Now wrote:adderall and xanax...fun stuff.
No med board in the country will see that as legitimate. First time offenders will usually get a reprimand, possibly a fine, and may have to take a CME course on ethics. Unless, of course, there is evidence that the prescription for Uncle Bobby is actually being diverted over to the prescriber, in which case the stakes increase exponentially.
Unlike Medicare, there is no whistle-blower bounty on catching violators. Be guided by your conscience - knowing that in the best case scenario, addictive medications are being prescribed to someone by a doc who lacks objectivity on when to cut them back / cut them off.
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:30 am
by Shafpocalypse Now
This has only become apparent recently. I am not planning on ratting them out, only thinking about how to let them know they are on a shitty path
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:46 am
by TerryB
have you learned nothing the past 10-15 years?
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:32 am
by Sangoma
I anaesthetised my wife several times. One of those was spinal block for the caesaerean for our second daughter.

Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:03 pm
by TerryB
Jesus. 5th Amendment bro!
Re: Med professionals: ? On ethics
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:55 pm
by WildGorillaMan
Sangoma wrote:I anaesthetised my wife several times. One of those was spinal block for the caesaerean for our second daughter.

And you were worried about me being imprisoned for posting a couple of facts about PEDs?