Petraeus on Benghazi

Topics without replies are pruned every 365 days. Not moderated.

Moderator: Dux

User avatar

DrDonkeyLove
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 8034
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 4:04 am
Location: Deep in a well

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by DrDonkeyLove »

cleaner464 wrote:Obama secretly bathes in the blood of Virgins.
Lilly white Christian virgins stolen from the pews of churches during a holy day mass.
Mao wrote:Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. Our principle is that the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party


Andy83
Sgt. Major
Posts: 2650
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:07 am

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by Andy83 »

We've been in the deepest recession since the great depression. We're going over a fiscal cliff. We gotta keep going forward!
Obama's narcissism and arrogance is only superseded by his naivete and stupidity.

User avatar

tough old man
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Hell

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by tough old man »

I say go over the cliff! Bungee!
"I am the author of my own misfortune, I don't need a ghost writer" - Ian Dury


"Legio mihi nomen est, quia multi sumus."

User avatar

Fat Cat
Jesus Christ®
Posts: 40920
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 4:54 pm
Location: 悪を根付かせるな

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by Fat Cat »

People talk about the federal government shutting down like its a bad thing.
Image
"That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy.
It is our job to see that it stays there." - George Orwell

User avatar

Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21247
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by Turdacious »

cleaner464 wrote:Obama secretly bathes in the blood of Virgins.
Cleaner secretly bathes with @-- kind of the same thing.
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule


The Ginger Beard Man
Sgt. Major
Posts: 4376
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:27 pm
Location: 4th largest city in America

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by The Ginger Beard Man »

Pinky wrote:If they lied, as opposed to simply talking without knowing wtf actually happened, they might have been afraid of people thinking the administration used American resources to help Libyan rebels just to have those same Libyans turn around and attack our consulate.
Now, why would anyone ever think that?
Blaidd Drwg wrote:Disengage from the outcome and do work.
Jezzy Bell wrote:Use a fucking barbell, pansy.


Andy83
Sgt. Major
Posts: 2650
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:07 am

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by Andy83 »

tough old man wrote:I say go over the cliff! Bungee!
Listen to any of the news stations and the term"fiscal cliff" makes for a good drinking game.
I'm with you but I''ll do a base jump.
Obama's narcissism and arrogance is only superseded by his naivete and stupidity.

User avatar

Sassenach
ironslinger
Posts: 8453
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:19 am
Location: Snatchville

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by Sassenach »

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat ... story.html


The details about possible al-Qaeda involvement were not included in talking points initially used by both Petraeus and Rice because they were preliminary and were based on classified sources, intelligence officials said.

Critics of administration conduct have suggested that the White House excised any reference to terrorism for political reasons.

A senior U.S. official familiar with the drafting of the talking points said Friday that they “reflected what was known at the time” and “were not, as has been insinuated by some, edited to minimize the role of extremists, diminish terrorist affiliations or play down that this was an attack.” In addition to concerns about classified sources, the official said, “when links were so tenuous — as they still are — it makes sense to be cautious before pointing fingers to avoid setting off a chain of circular and self-reinforcing assumptions.”
Kazuya Mishima wrote:they can pry the bacon from my cold dead hand.

User avatar

Topic author
johno
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7901
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:36 pm

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by johno »

Jezebel Jones wrote: A senior U.S. official familiar with the drafting of the talking points said Friday that they “reflected what was known at the time”
That's great. Except the talking points were entirely false, based on nothing that went on in Benghazi.
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

W.B. Yeats

User avatar

cleaner464
Sgt. Major
Posts: 4876
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 5:56 pm

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by cleaner464 »

Turdacious wrote:
cleaner464 wrote:Obama secretly bathes in the blood of Virgins.
Cleaner secretly bathes with @-- kind of the same thing.
Your father openly bathes in my man-milk.
“Attached hereto is a copy of Mr. Trump’s birth certificate, demonstrating that he is the son of Fred Trump, not an orangutan,”

User avatar

Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21247
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by Turdacious »

cleaner464 wrote:
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule


Protobuilder
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 5038
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:51 am

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by Protobuilder »

The deputy of slain U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens has told congressional investigators that a team of Special Forces prepared to fly from Tripoli to Benghazi during the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks was forbidden from doing so by U.S. Special Operations Command Africa.

The account from Gregory Hicks is in stark contrast to assertions from the Obama administration, which insisted that nobody was ever told to stand down and that all available resources were utilized.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-575 ... g-attacks/
WildGorillaMan wrote:Enthusiasm combined with no skill whatsoever can sometimes carry the day.

User avatar

Topic author
johno
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7901
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:36 pm

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by johno »

When it became clear last fall that the CIA’s now discredited Benghazi talking points were flawed, the White House said repeatedly the documents were put together almost entirely by the intelligence community, but White House documents reviewed by Congress suggest a different story.

ABC News has obtained 12 different versions of the talking points that show they were extensively edited as they evolved from the drafts first written entirely by the CIA to the final version distributed to Congress and to U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice before she appeared on five talk shows the Sunday after that attack.

White House emails reviewed by ABC News suggest the edits were made with extensive input from the State Department. The edits included requests from the State Department that references to the Al Qaeda-affiliated group Ansar al-Sharia be deleted as well references to CIA warnings about terrorist threats in Benghazi in the months preceding the attack.


http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/20 ... eferences/
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

W.B. Yeats

User avatar

seeahill
Font of All Wisdom, God Damn it
Posts: 7842
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 6:07 pm
Location: The Deep Blue Sea

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by seeahill »

Image
Image

User avatar

Batboy2/75
Starship Trooper
Posts: 7670
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 3:58 am
Location: Pumping Elizebeth Shue's Ass!

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by Batboy2/75 »

Just remember this: some dumb demented bastard that made a crappy anti-muslim online movie is sitting in jail without bail. What was his crime involving Benghazi? Nothing! Except being a useful fall guy for an administration to cast blame on.

That dude sits in the pokey (without bail), while the pervert Ariel Castro's bail is set at $8,000,000. In reality $800,000 is what he would need to walk free. The video guy was a loon, but the reason for revoking this guys praole is total bullshit and based on a lie.

This is what the administration is trying to cover up.

The fact that our Ambassador was trying to get back some particularly nasty weapons we foolishly didn't prevent the Libyan Al-Qaida branch from getting their hands on. This is why our Lybian Ambassador was in Benghazi meeting with the Turks. We wanted those weapons back and we wanted the Turks to help us.

Everything else is just normal Hillary Clinton incompetence.

That is "Why" this matters; Four Americans are dead, over thirty were maimed, a usefull dupe sits in jail, and a bunch of anti-aircraft missles are missing.
Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of arms is the distinction of the free man from the slave.

I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.


Image

User avatar

Fat Cat
Jesus Christ®
Posts: 40920
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 4:54 pm
Location: 悪を根付かせるな

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by Fat Cat »

Today the West African Black Rhinoceros was declared officially extinct.
Image
"That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy.
It is our job to see that it stays there." - George Orwell

User avatar

Topic author
johno
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7901
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:36 pm

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by johno »

seeahill wrote:Image
And which of those attacks killed four US citizens, including a US ambassador? IIRC, the last time an ambassador was killed was during the Carter era.

BTW, the security failure was sad, but the subsequent BS cover story is a much greater problem.
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

W.B. Yeats


The Ginger Beard Man
Sgt. Major
Posts: 4376
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:27 pm
Location: 4th largest city in America

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by The Ginger Beard Man »

seeahill wrote:Image
How many of those attacks took place over multiple hours, with military resources possibly in a position to help, but ordered not to. During an election.
The cover up is always worse than the crime. Ask Richard Nixon. Ask Martha Stewart.
No doubt the republicans are trying to gain a political advantage here, but don't act as if the democrats wouldn't. Or weren't, by lying about what happened.
Blaidd Drwg wrote:Disengage from the outcome and do work.
Jezzy Bell wrote:Use a fucking barbell, pansy.

User avatar

powerlifter54
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7976
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 5:46 pm
Location: TX

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by powerlifter54 »

All the Obamas had to do was simply respond like pros. Should have had aircraft at Sig, Souda, or Aviano. Or launched them.

They could have just said did not want to have collateral damage so aborted strike.

Then been outraged at AQ. Would have been fine.

But for some reason or reasons they got cute. Probably the close election. The Vegas thing is amazing.

And now the press has to react after Obama and company caught fibbing about talking points.

This is like watching a guy with a bunch of boxes in his arms blindly walk toward a staircase.

The fall is gonna be ugly. And avoidable.

My guess is Hillary takes the brunt of it, Obama just becomes a lame duck.Interesting maybe John F'in Kerry or Delaware Joe leaked info...
"Start slowly, then ease off". Tortuga Golden Striders Running Club, Pensacola 1984.

"But even snake wrestling beats life in the cube, for me at least. In measured doses."-Lex


Gene
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 5385
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Voct. США

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by Gene »

One of the key unanswered, even unasked, questions about the U.S. and Ambassador Stevens relationship with Abdelhakim Belhadj concerns not so much the 2011 period of the Libyan revolt, but rather what followed. Was Ambassador Stevens still in touch with Belhadj and/or other Al Qaeda-linked figures even after Belhadj traveled to Istanbul, Turkey, in November, 2011 to make contact with the Syrian Free Army?

According to August, 2012 reports leaked to the media, sometime earlier in 2012, President Obama signed an intelligence finding to permit the CIA and other US government agencies to provide support to the Syrian rebels, whose ranks are reported to be dominated by Al Qaeda, the Muslim Brotherhood and other jihadist fighters who already are supported by Turkey, Saudi Arabia and other jihadist regimes. Was Belhadj a conduit for U.S. support, perhaps via Turkey?

It might be recalled that, according to the Department of State’s transcript of a October 9, 2012 telephone conference call held to brief reporters on what happened in Benghazi, the final meeting that Ambassador Stevens held the night of September 11, 2012 before the attack began was with a Turkish diplomat.
http://counterpsyops.com/2012/10/22/arm ... -cover-up/

As someone said during Watergate "Follow the money". Saudi money, which is intended to isolate Shia Islam in the Middle East so that Iran can be neutralized politically and thus reduce the threat to Sunni Saudis.

Syria is run by Alawites, a sect of Shia Islam. The Muslim Brotherhood has tried for years to overthrow Assad and his family.

Obama is doing the bidding of Saudis, as every US President has done since Nixon. Simply would NOT DO for him to be outed as a "war monger" as this would annoy Code Pink and the rest.
This space for let


TerryB
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 9697
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:17 pm

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by TerryB »

Grandpa's Spells wrote:The theory I am reading from the conspiracy theorists is that the administration lied in their initial assessment of this coming out of a riot or not. I don't see what the administration gains by telling such a lie, or why such a distinction would make a difference. Anybody know what the deal is?
Look up Peggy Noonan's article, out today
"Know that! & Know it deep you fucking loser!"

Image

User avatar

Herv100
Sgt. Major
Posts: 3783
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:12 am

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by Herv100 »

seeahill wrote:Image
LOL. You're such a fucking partisan hack
Image

User avatar

DARTH
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 8427
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 7:42 pm

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by DARTH »

Anything called Mother Jones just sounds like the place reeks of shit from all the assfuckers and cocksuckers in the place going ass to mouth.

:-k Everyone I've seen from it was stereo typical plastic rimmed glasses wearing, low T count bitch boy types who just scream that they were the little twerp in school who got picked on and instead of nutting up and fighting back learned to suck up to the teachers and rely on the system to handle their inability to become men about shit. :axe:


Maybe Obama got together with some of his Jawa secret fuck buddies (because step daddy taught him how to take that cock dry.) and staged this shit so Stevens could be a hostage and then the great one could negotiate a release just in time for Election day? Not saying this is fact.

Not letting fucking SF and other high speed types run to the fire just does not sound right, same with not putting jets over the place while those 2 SEAL were using a laser marker, wondering where the fucking air support was.

Just does not sound like the way those types do shit, going by knowing Trooper and a few of his crew.

I;ve just heard to many tales of guys jumping into the shit for each other and a few " I did not hear any transmission telling us no, did you ?" " Not me."

One of his was in this chain, I bet he was furious. He;s a guy who kept going out on ops way past the rank where they are supposed to stand back and point. A real if his guys are in the shit, then he;s going in the shit kind of man.




"God forbid we tell the savages to go fuck themselves." Batboy

User avatar

cleaner464
Sgt. Major
Posts: 4876
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 5:56 pm

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by cleaner464 »

Obama is in league with principalities, with powers, with the rulers of the darkness of this world.

Please.

Demographics are working against the angry, conservative, white man despite all the gerrymandering and dirty voting tricks he can muster.
“Attached hereto is a copy of Mr. Trump’s birth certificate, demonstrating that he is the son of Fred Trump, not an orangutan,”

User avatar

seeahill
Font of All Wisdom, God Damn it
Posts: 7842
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 6:07 pm
Location: The Deep Blue Sea

Re: Petraeus on Benghazi

Post by seeahill »

Ummm.... Dart, check the source, then tell me it is not legit.

Post Reply