Presidential Election 2016 (was "Debates")
Moderator: Dux
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm
Re: Presidential Debates
Post by dead man walking »
the gang here is yesterday's news. get used to it.
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.
dead man walking
johno
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm
Re: Presidential Debates
Post by dead man walking »
i'm not sure which i my two posts leads you to conclude the nation is doomed.
the majority is unwilling to put the country in the hands of donnie and his band of choleric, superstitious supporters. the election is decided. the discussion now is the post-mortem.
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.
dead man walking
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21247
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
- Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan
Re: Presidential Debates
Post by Turdacious »
Enough time to get serially bent over by the Russians (probably not the endorsement the Putin lovin' Donald was looking for).syaigh wrote:And wasn't he only president for like a year and a half?Turdacious wrote:That was pretty much the assessment on JFK too FWIW.syaigh wrote:He lacks experience, he has no discernible plan, letting him loose on our economy abd foreign policy would be like setting a fox lose in the hen house. If the fox was a dumb asshole.
Turdacious
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21247
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
- Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan
Re: Presidential Debates
Post by Turdacious »
Keep in mind that he's spent most of his career as a NYC Democrat. It's possible that he's no more a Republican than Bernie was a Democrat. Why Dems were so comfortable with the Donald in their tent is as big a question as why Republicans are comfortable with him in theirs.dead man walking wrote:for all the bullshit about sex and walls and emails, it looks like this election is splitting along r & d lines, with a lot of unenthusiastic d's, and the r's losing people because of trump's racism, misogyny, and all-purpose craziness. he's a parody of a white alpha male, but white males seem drawn to his barking.
the dems may have fucked up, but the r's fucked up bigly, so bigly, so stupid, retarded, the bigliest. small hands and a fox pelt. such a loser.
Turdacious
Re: Presidential Debates
The people already in the tent, and who owned the tent, were more than glad to see the new voters in the tent but less than glad to see who brought them to the tent. On both sides.Turdacious wrote:Keep in mind that he's spent most of his career as a NYC Democrat. It's possible that he's no more a Republican than Bernie was a Democrat. Why Dems were so comfortable with the Donald in their tent is as big a question as why Republicans are comfortable with him in theirs.dead man walking wrote:for all the bullshit about sex and walls and emails, it looks like this election is splitting along r & d lines, with a lot of unenthusiastic d's, and the r's losing people because of trump's racism, misogyny, and all-purpose craziness. he's a parody of a white alpha male, but white males seem drawn to his barking.
the dems may have fucked up, but the r's fucked up bigly, so bigly, so stupid, retarded, the bigliest. small hands and a fox pelt. such a loser.
I liked this quote I heard, the establishment takes Trump literally and so not seriously, while his supporters take him seriously but not literally.
His refusal to accept the election results and therefore the will of the people...

nafod
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21247
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
- Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan
Re: Presidential Debates
Post by Turdacious »
Depends on the results. If the election's close (like 1960) that's one thing. If he can't cross the Alf Landon line that's another.nafod wrote:His refusal to accept the election results and therefore the will of the people...
Turdacious
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm
Re: Presidential Debates
Post by dead man walking »
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.
dead man walking
Re: Presidential Debates
No it doesn't.Turdacious wrote:Depends on the results.nafod wrote:His refusal to accept the election results and therefore the will of the people...
If at the end of the day the election is certified, it is by definition the will of the people. It's worked for 240 years, through multiple wars and some pretty nasty elections. Fuck Donald Trump.
nafod
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 11367
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm
Re: Presidential Debates
Post by Grandpa's Spells »
Yeah, there's no spinning that one, as hard as his surrogates tried. WSJ front page got it right.nafod wrote:No it doesn't.Turdacious wrote:Depends on the results.nafod wrote:His refusal to accept the election results and therefore the will of the people...
If at the end of the day the election is certified, it is by definition the will of the people. It's worked for 240 years, through multiple wars and some pretty nasty elections. Fuck Donald Trump.
What the fuck happened to Rudy Giuliani. From America's mayor to Trump's min pin.
Grandpa's Spells
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 7976
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 5:46 pm
- Location: TX
Re: Presidential Debates
Post by powerlifter54 »
Yeah that whole AlGore nonsense. Hard to believe anybody would question an election.nafod wrote:No it doesn't.Turdacious wrote:Depends on the results.nafod wrote:His refusal to accept the election results and therefore the will of the people...
If at the end of the day the election is certified, it is by definition the will of the people. It's worked for 240 years, through multiple wars and some pretty nasty elections. Fuck Donald Trump.
"But even snake wrestling beats life in the cube, for me at least. In measured doses."-Lex
powerlifter54
Re: Presidential Debates
How dare you, Sir! Democrats rose up in unanimous opposition to Gore's shameful challenge.powerlifter54 wrote:
Yeah that whole AlGore nonsense. Hard to believe anybody would question an election.
Are full of passionate intensity.
W.B. Yeats
johno
Re: Presidential Debates
Asking for a recount in an exceptionally close election is a difference of kind, not degree, between Gore and Trump. Florida law mandated a recount because the margin was so close, not because Gore was a narcissistic blowhard who convinced himself, despite all evidence to the contrary, that he is a winner.powerlifter54 wrote:Yeah that whole AlGore nonsense. Hard to believe anybody would question an election.nafod wrote:No it doesn't.Turdacious wrote:Depends on the results.nafod wrote:His refusal to accept the election results and therefore the will of the people...
If at the end of the day the election is certified, it is by definition the will of the people. It's worked for 240 years, through multiple wars and some pretty nasty elections. Fuck Donald Trump.
JohnDoe
Re: Presidential Debates
Gore conceded. Then unconceded and contested. No High Road for the Dems on a prompt & peaceful transition.JohnDoe wrote: Asking for a recount in an exceptionally close election is a difference of kind, not degree, between Gore and Trump. Florida law mandated a recount because the margin was so close, not because Gore was a narcissistic blowhard who convinced himself, despite all evidence to the contrary, that he is a winner.
Are full of passionate intensity.
W.B. Yeats
johno
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm
Re: Presidential Debates
Post by dead man walking »
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.
dead man walking
-
- Top
- Posts: 2431
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
- Location: Wherever they's a fight so hungry people can eat
Re: Presidential Debates
Post by Yes I Have Balls »
You can relitigate the past all you want. There is a chasm of difference between deeming election "rigged" in advance & challenging 271-266 result, razor-thin Florida numbers.powerlifter54 wrote:Yeah that whole AlGore nonsense. Hard to believe anybody would question an election.nafod wrote:No it doesn't.Turdacious wrote:Depends on the results.nafod wrote:His refusal to accept the election results and therefore the will of the people...
If at the end of the day the election is certified, it is by definition the will of the people. It's worked for 240 years, through multiple wars and some pretty nasty elections. Fuck Donald Trump.
Even you can't be so dense as to argue otherwise.
Yes I Have Balls
-
- Top
- Posts: 2431
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
- Location: Wherever they's a fight so hungry people can eat
Re: Presidential Debates
Post by Yes I Have Balls »
There are Hillary supporters on IGX? Big if true.TerryB wrote:How come I never see Hillary supporters posting about her accomplishments or tangible leadership achievements?
Yes I Have Balls
-
- Top
- Posts: 2431
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
- Location: Wherever they's a fight so hungry people can eat
Re: Presidential Debates
Post by Yes I Have Balls »
It is what you said. Own it!johno wrote:^ Not what I said.Yes I Have Balls wrote:That didn't take long. You perverted mother fucker. You are actually DEFENDING a man accused by 10+ women of sexual assault. Man, I have new respect to the absolute depths you will sink. You victim-shaming piece of shit.johno wrote:It's not sexual assault if you...don't object [at the time].
Yes I Have Balls
-
- Top
- Posts: 2431
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
- Location: Wherever they's a fight so hungry people can eat
Re: Presidential Debates
Post by Yes I Have Balls »
Yes she is insatiable. I just rolled off her and and am untying your dad for his next dicking. He cries too much though.johno wrote:I will only say this: "Your Mom is a thoroughbred, Kid."Yes I Have Balls wrote:This makes me so curious as to what the search history of your porn is. Gotta be fucking brutal.
Yes I Have Balls
Re: Presidential Debates
I missed the part where Al Gore called for pitchforks in the streets. I am sure some Dems were ready, as deplorables come in all political affiliations.powerlifter54 wrote:Yeah that whole AlGore nonsense. Hard to believe anybody would question an election.nafod wrote:No it doesn't.Turdacious wrote:Depends on the results.nafod wrote:His refusal to accept the election results and therefore the will of the people...
If at the end of the day the election is certified, it is by definition the will of the people. It's worked for 240 years, through multiple wars and some pretty nasty elections. Fuck Donald Trump.
There is a process, the process was followed, the Supreme Court tossed it to GWB, Gore gracefully conceded. It is the case study in peaceful transfer of power.
That was *not* what Trump was talking about.
nafod
-
- Top
- Posts: 2431
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
- Location: Wherever they's a fight so hungry people can eat
Re: Presidential Debates
Post by Yes I Have Balls »
Yes I Have Balls
Re: Presidential Debates
You have no idea what Trump was talking about. That's not how he rolls.nafod wrote: That was *not* what Trump was talking about.
Are full of passionate intensity.
W.B. Yeats
johno
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 8034
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 4:04 am
- Location: Deep in a well
Re: Presidential Debates
Post by DrDonkeyLove »
The Dems used the SC toss to Bush as a lever to delegitimize his presidency from day 1 until today. Should Trump lose a very tight race, his supporters will do the same thing to Clinton.nafod wrote:I missed the part where Al Gore called for pitchforks in the streets. I am sure some Dems were ready, as deplorables come in all political affiliations.powerlifter54 wrote:Yeah that whole AlGore nonsense. Hard to believe anybody would question an election.nafod wrote:No it doesn't.Turdacious wrote:Depends on the results.nafod wrote:His refusal to accept the election results and therefore the will of the people...
If at the end of the day the election is certified, it is by definition the will of the people. It's worked for 240 years, through multiple wars and some pretty nasty elections. Fuck Donald Trump.
There is a process, the process was followed, the Supreme Court tossed it to GWB, Gore gracefully conceded. It is the case study in peaceful transfer of power.
That was *not* what Trump was talking about.
And, regarding "rigging", the plans are in place across the nation. Dems excel at voter fraud today as they always have and certain amongst them can't help themselves. Let's hope it's not so close that their rigging matters.
I have a prediction. Should it be a very close win by Trump, Dem hacks across the nation will unleash an unholy scream and swarms of lawyers to fight the "will of the people". The MSM will do a reverse take on "rigging" that's so swift it could cause spinal damage.
Mao wrote:Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. Our principle is that the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party
DrDonkeyLove
Re: Presidential Debates
That happens a lot.johno wrote:You have no idea what Trump was talking about.nafod wrote: That was *not* what Trump was talking about.

I do know what he wasn't talking about, though.
nafod
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 11367
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm
Re: Presidential Debates
Post by Grandpa's Spells »
You're forgetful or crazy. Bush got bipartisan support on his agenda even before 9/11. Right out of the gate he got Dem votes for his tax cuts.DrDonkeyLove wrote:The Dems used the SC toss to Bush as a lever to delegitimize his presidency from day 1 until today.
Grandpa's Spells