Unknown specialists with unknown training following unknown guidelines for unknown reasons.Fat Cat wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 1:44 am Faceberg has officially Zucker'd Qanon:
Facebook bans QAnon conspiracy theory accounts across all platforms
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-54443878
So much for letting people vet concepts in the marketplace of ideas. Whatever your thoughts about Qanon are, you should be concerned, now that only ideologically-approved "specialists" and "experts" are allowed to have opinions.
I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
Moderator: Dux
-
- Sarge
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2019 10:29 pm
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
Facebook should only allow pictures of visits to the beach where you get your picture taken while everyone wears white. A pouty trout face shots.
Don’t believe everything you think.
-
Topic author - Top
- Posts: 1237
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2019 3:51 pm
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
My mind isn't dominated by fear of CONTAGION so this makes me even more certain there is a very real there there wrt Q poasts.
-
Topic author - Top
- Posts: 1237
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2019 3:51 pm
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
The only thing I think is dumb about Q is the meme that there is some counter-faction within the Institutions fighting on Trump's side.
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
There's plenty I find objectionable, but that really shouldn't matter at all, should it. But in our modern dystopia, the ideological den mothers that never got asked to prom are the gatekeepers of orthodoxy.

"That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy.
It is our job to see that it stays there." - George Orwell
-
Topic author - Top
- Posts: 1237
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2019 3:51 pm
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
Lot's is dumb and meant to appeal to boomer goons but I don't think there's anything objectionable even by mainstream culture's own standards. Unless dissidence itself is objectionable.
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
What are the Qbert's up to now? Has there been any word from the world's most mysterious consonant?

"That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy.
It is our job to see that it stays there." - George Orwell
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
Holy shit, Fats. You dropped that one right on target.
This space for let
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
They lose me when they come up with their alternative facts. Comet Ping Pong being the inevitable outcome.
The Capitol riot was nothing more than comet Ping pong x 10,000. Fueled by a big easily disproved lie.
Don’t believe everything you think.
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 11367
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
The profile of folks embracing this stuff is... depressing
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/17/tech ... queen.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/17/tech ... queen.html
One of the downsides of the Internet is that it allows like-minded people to form communities, and sometimes those communities are stupid.
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 11367
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
OTOH, this is funny.


One of the downsides of the Internet is that it allows like-minded people to form communities, and sometimes those communities are stupid.
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
First off, what a giant, obvious, pile of bullshit.
Second, it's sad that there is a trickle down effect to non-believers. If you have enough people saying that Covid is a hoax, and that the election was stolen, people start believing those things.
Second, it's sad that there is a trickle down effect to non-believers. If you have enough people saying that Covid is a hoax, and that the election was stolen, people start believing those things.
“If it won't matter in a year, don't spend more than a day stressing about it."
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
I've shifted from being upset by it, to trying to figure out how to monetize it.
Don’t believe everything you think.
-
- Top
- Posts: 1619
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:57 am
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
I listened to a podcast the other day, I’m not sure if it was mentioned here or not.
I liked it, and the info seemed legit, but I’m not too tuned into it all so who knows?
It took me a minute to get past the hosts voice...
He interviews the cripple who started 8chan who, through his knowledge of how the site works and its history, says he knows who Q is.
It’s the “reply all” podcast, episode 166, “a country of liars”
I liked it, and the info seemed legit, but I’m not too tuned into it all so who knows?
It took me a minute to get past the hosts voice...
He interviews the cripple who started 8chan who, through his knowledge of how the site works and its history, says he knows who Q is.
It’s the “reply all” podcast, episode 166, “a country of liars”
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
Has there ever been anything as stupid as Qanon?
Don’t believe everything you think.
-
- Top
- Posts: 1619
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:57 am
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
It’s a shame really...it takes issues that are legitimate, like child/human trafficking, and makes those things seem like “crazy unfounded conspiracies” bc of how nutty Qanon followers appear.
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
No one in their right mind is for child trafficking.
But that is a separate issue folded into the Q-Anon narrative.
Discrediting Q-Anon by no means now legitimizes the abuse of kids.
It’s a huge crime, both legislatively and morally, and nothing is going to change that. Unfortunately, like all crimes, it will continue to arise, and will have to continue to be battled.
But that is a separate issue folded into the Q-Anon narrative.
Discrediting Q-Anon by no means now legitimizes the abuse of kids.
It’s a huge crime, both legislatively and morally, and nothing is going to change that. Unfortunately, like all crimes, it will continue to arise, and will have to continue to be battled.
“If it won't matter in a year, don't spend more than a day stressing about it."
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
Using sex trafficking of children by q and other groups has nothing to do with sex trafficking of kids.
It is a simple trigger and diversion.
"Why are you out protesting for BLM when THERE ARE CHILDREN BEING SEX TRAFFICKED."
It's the part of the double holy grail for riling up the base. Racial justice???? WHAT ABOUT SEX TRAFFICKING OF CHILDREN!!! Oh...and look at how many black people shot black people in chicago.
Sex trafficking of children is also potent because it ties in with the liberal pedophiliac sex cults of hollywood narrative.
So with it, you have a lot of things coalescing into a very simple, powerful narrative that motivates people.
I can't find it anymore, but back in the day there was lot of information (at least a lot in the circles that wrote about this stuff) about scientology's use of accusing its critics of being pedophiles. Videos of them accosting protestors and accusing them of being pedophiles, child rapists, etc.
Of course I do not support any abuse of children. And I have no doubt that there is some scum and villainy and shady shit in hollywood.
But even the NEED for me to clarify hows what a powerful tactic it is for PR, mind wars, disinformation, etc.
It is a simple trigger and diversion.
"Why are you out protesting for BLM when THERE ARE CHILDREN BEING SEX TRAFFICKED."
It's the part of the double holy grail for riling up the base. Racial justice???? WHAT ABOUT SEX TRAFFICKING OF CHILDREN!!! Oh...and look at how many black people shot black people in chicago.
Sex trafficking of children is also potent because it ties in with the liberal pedophiliac sex cults of hollywood narrative.
So with it, you have a lot of things coalescing into a very simple, powerful narrative that motivates people.
I can't find it anymore, but back in the day there was lot of information (at least a lot in the circles that wrote about this stuff) about scientology's use of accusing its critics of being pedophiles. Videos of them accosting protestors and accusing them of being pedophiles, child rapists, etc.
Of course I do not support any abuse of children. And I have no doubt that there is some scum and villainy and shady shit in hollywood.
But even the NEED for me to clarify hows what a powerful tactic it is for PR, mind wars, disinformation, etc.
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 11367
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
I do like the idea of the Q leaders telling people, "Well we gave it a shot time to go back to our lives," ignoring the fact that they've been claiming a satanic pedophile ring is taking children.
One of the downsides of the Internet is that it allows like-minded people to form communities, and sometimes those communities are stupid.
-
- Top
- Posts: 1619
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:57 am
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
Not what I meant, and I don’t think it’s what I said...Bram wrote: ↑Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:25 pm No one in their right mind is for child trafficking.
But that is a separate issue folded into the Q-Anon narrative.
Discrediting Q-Anon by no means now legitimizes the abuse of kids.
It’s a huge crime, both legislatively and morally, and nothing is going to change that. Unfortunately, like all crimes, it will continue to arise, and will have to continue to be battled.
What I meant was that bc Q-followers went hard on the satanic cabal/adrenochrome/pedo front, that it could tarnish or postpone a real conversation about the possibility of systematic abuse by people who hold positions of influence.
Look at pizzagate....there weren’t kids in the basement of a pizza restaurant, but a lot of the players in that story are weird as fuck, and a lot of terminology and symbolism is suspect. But bc a nutter went in there with a rifle looking to off some satanic cultists it’s an off the table topic without appearing like a tinfoil hat wearing loon.
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
I dunno, I think Jeffrey Epstein showed that the rot goes to the top.
Q-Anon or not, his history is out there.
Q-Anon or not, his history is out there.
“If it won't matter in a year, don't spend more than a day stressing about it."
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 5058
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:13 am
- Location: The Usual Gang of Idiots
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
I look at Q believers with the same eye I look at people who fell for Trump's bullshit. They're the same brand of fools who will fall in for some preacher telling them he decoded the bible and figured out the world will end on x/x/xx, and they should sell all their belongings and donate the proceeds to the church. It sucks people are gullible enough to fall for any shade of bullshit, but if you're dumb enough to fall for THAT level of bullshit with absolutely ZERO evidence I just have to shake my head in wonder.
I honestly think our brand of religious lunacy in the US softens the mind of people so these sorts of mind viruses can take hold. If you're willing to believe the biggest lie ever told, you're only one step away from believing any other made up horse shit.
But GOD DAMN this Q shit is as nutty as squirrel turds. Right up there with Scientology with made-up-on-the-fly garbage. Whoever is behind Q is probably laughing as hard at these chumps as L Ron did at the Scientology converts who emptied their wallets at his feet.
I honestly think our brand of religious lunacy in the US softens the mind of people so these sorts of mind viruses can take hold. If you're willing to believe the biggest lie ever told, you're only one step away from believing any other made up horse shit.
But GOD DAMN this Q shit is as nutty as squirrel turds. Right up there with Scientology with made-up-on-the-fly garbage. Whoever is behind Q is probably laughing as hard at these chumps as L Ron did at the Scientology converts who emptied their wallets at his feet.
I don't have a lot of experience with vampires, but I have hunted werewolves. I shot one once, but by the time I got to it, it had turned back into my neighbor's dog.
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
Alfred, I like what you've been bringing in terms of content and eloquence. Keep it up 

“If it won't matter in a year, don't spend more than a day stressing about it."
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21281
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:26 pm
Re: I suppose we should have a Qanon thr& or something
I love it that Q tards are embracing the sovereign man/freeman philosophies to make the shit even more convoluted and nutty. For example, I have an aunt that has gotten fully on board this ship and I had to hide all her posts because they were literally a cry for help with her mental illness.