Ken Burns' "National Parks" series
Moderator: Dux
Ken Burns' "National Parks" series
Wife & I watched Part One last night, but didn't get through it, for reasons stated below.
Beautiful cinematography. Beautiful country.
Narrated by Sam Waterston, if my ears tell me right**. He does fine.
I also enjoyed most of the score.
But I couldn't stand the script...it was smarmy, new-agey, preachy, and repetitive.
So many references to "cathedrals," "Eden," "holy," "sacred," etc., yet scarcely mentioning "God." Which makes it alright, because we're worshipping Nature here.
PBS would laugh out of their office any script that treated the traditional God of Western Civilization with such reverence. Too unhip.
JMO, YMMV.
**EDIT - Narrator is Peter Coyote. He does fine.
Beautiful cinematography. Beautiful country.
Narrated by Sam Waterston, if my ears tell me right**. He does fine.
I also enjoyed most of the score.
But I couldn't stand the script...it was smarmy, new-agey, preachy, and repetitive.
So many references to "cathedrals," "Eden," "holy," "sacred," etc., yet scarcely mentioning "God." Which makes it alright, because we're worshipping Nature here.
PBS would laugh out of their office any script that treated the traditional God of Western Civilization with such reverence. Too unhip.
JMO, YMMV.
**EDIT - Narrator is Peter Coyote. He does fine.
Last edited by johno on Thu Oct 01, 2009 5:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
W.B. Yeats
Are full of passionate intensity.
W.B. Yeats
Re: Ken Burns' "National Parks" series
Wait, so you didn't like it because it was nonsectarian?

"That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy.
It is our job to see that it stays there." - George Orwell
-
- Top
- Posts: 2311
- Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 6:08 am
- Location: Down in the cane brake, close by the mill
Re: Ken Burns' "National Parks" series
Burns has been going downhill since his failure with The War. He couldn't even come close to touching the quality of a thirty-five year old show.


“Wherever the crowd goes, run the other direction. They’re always wrong.” Bukowski
-
- Gunny
- Posts: 962
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 12:04 am
- Location: 612 Wharf Avenue
Re: Ken Burns' "National Parks" series
Wow. First negative thing I've EVER heard about The War. I loved it so much I watched ever ep multiple times on the ol' DVR before just buying the box set. I watch more documentaries than any healthy American should and The War is #1 on my list.vern wrote:Burns has been going downhill since his failure with The War.
Re: Ken Burns' "National Parks" series
National Parks?
SOCIALISM!!!
SOCIALISM!!!
The flesh is weak, and the smell of pussy is strong like a muthafucka.
Re: Ken Burns' "National Parks" series
I hated The War; buncha PC crap. But The Civil War owned. I can watch that repeatedly.

"That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy.
It is our job to see that it stays there." - George Orwell
-
- Font of All Wisdom, God Damn it
- Posts: 7842
- Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 6:07 pm
- Location: The Deep Blue Sea
Re: Ken Burns' "National Parks" series
Johno,
But see, that's history. It is the history of the Parks. We were basically in a situation where all public land was seen as an opportunity for commerce. In 1871, for instance, several Montana entrepreneurs had begun building fences around the beauty spots of Yellowstone to capitalize on geysers and the like. What stopped them --- what gave legitimacy to the idea of preservation --- was the transcendentalist vision of nature as a cathedral apart from the Nortre Dames of Europe.
Yellowstone became a Park in 1872.
So maybe people are still talking that way today, and it bothers you. I don't blame you. But the history of the thought is inspiring. An American doesn't have to go the church, but, god damn it, an American can acquaint himself with the wilderness. He has a church finer than any built by the hand of man.
He don't need no steenking Notre Dame.
But see, that's history. It is the history of the Parks. We were basically in a situation where all public land was seen as an opportunity for commerce. In 1871, for instance, several Montana entrepreneurs had begun building fences around the beauty spots of Yellowstone to capitalize on geysers and the like. What stopped them --- what gave legitimacy to the idea of preservation --- was the transcendentalist vision of nature as a cathedral apart from the Nortre Dames of Europe.
Yellowstone became a Park in 1872.
So maybe people are still talking that way today, and it bothers you. I don't blame you. But the history of the thought is inspiring. An American doesn't have to go the church, but, god damn it, an American can acquaint himself with the wilderness. He has a church finer than any built by the hand of man.
He don't need no steenking Notre Dame.

Re: Ken Burns' "National Parks" series
I've been to Notre Dame and it sucks compared to Yosemite valley.

"That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy.
It is our job to see that it stays there." - George Orwell
-
- Top
- Posts: 2311
- Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 6:08 am
- Location: Down in the cane brake, close by the mill
Re: Ken Burns' "National Parks" series
Ron, watch The World at War and get back to me. Burn's film should have been called 'The War As Seen Through the Eyes of Housewives'. I couldn't watch it.Ronald RayGun wrote:Wow. First negative thing I've EVER heard about The War. I loved it so much I watched ever ep multiple times on the ol' DVR before just buying the box set. I watch more documentaries than any healthy American should and The War is #1 on my list.vern wrote:Burns has been going downhill since his failure with The War.
I agree with Fats that the Civil War documentary is a masterpiece and should be seen by every American.
“Wherever the crowd goes, run the other direction. They’re always wrong.” Bukowski
Re: Ken Burns' "National Parks" series
Particularly galling is the full title: The National Parks: America's Best Idea.
Thankfully, Burns included Clay Jenkinson, who deflated that idiocy.
Thankfully, Burns included Clay Jenkinson, who deflated that idiocy.
Re: Ken Burns' "National Parks" series
To the point that I stopped watching, Burns shows a preservationist bias. Not really an accurate or balanced history.seeahill wrote: But see, that's history. It is the history of the Parks.
Does he give conservationism its due?
-
- Gunny
- Posts: 962
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 12:04 am
- Location: 612 Wharf Avenue
Re: Ken Burns' "National Parks" series
On it just as soon as Demonoid is back up. Any other recommendations? I can watch documentaries all day.vern wrote:Ron, watch The World at War and get back to me.
-
- Font of All Wisdom, God Damn it
- Posts: 7842
- Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 6:07 pm
- Location: The Deep Blue Sea
Re: Ken Burns' "National Parks" series
I imagine, though I haven't seen any episodes but the first. You can't talk about National Parks and not mention Teddy Roosevelt. Preservationists and conservationists have been playing tug of war with Park policies for over a century. Any history of the Parks is incomplete if that conflict is ignored.johno wrote:To the point that I stopped watching, Burns shows a preservationist bias. Not really an accurate or balanced history.seeahill wrote: But see, that's history. It is the history of the Parks.
Does he give conservationism its due?

Re: Ken Burns' "National Parks" series
Roosevelt was all over at least one of the episodes I saw of the series. Great stuff.
