Here’s a question that is not meant to be the typical CF bashing this thread is (justifiably) famous for. I’m just curious, and would like to know if anyone has any reliable information. Has anyone who is recognized as being good at CF (a “firebreather”) ever demonstrated the ability to perform at a high level in another sport? I’m not talking about someone who was successful at gymnastics or soccer or track and field before gaining some notoriety in CF. I mean, has anyone ever started with CF and then shown ability elsewhere? The concept of “good” at either CF or some other activity is subjective, so interpret it however you will. But I’m thinking along the lines of a CF games finalist who has finished in the top 10% of some contest with hundreds of competitors, or a more exclusive contest that is recognized as a major championship.
I’ve been competing in 2-3 events a month for over a year now, and at some (Indoor Rowing, Tower Running, various road races) I see whole teams of CFers. With a few exceptions, these people finish well below the mean. I’m not putting them down, since they just seem to be out to have a good time and hang out with their buddies, and they aren’t getting in anybody’s face with their “eliteness”. But what got me thinking was looking at results from this year’s CRASH-B regatta (the indoor rowing world championship). Scan through these results and see how those who “do what you do nearly as well as you” really do:
http://www.concept2.com/us/racing/crash ... asp?race=1
http://www.concept2.com/us/racing/crash ... asp?race=2
The guy at #43 has a pretty solid time, decent but not remarkable by college standards. Is he considered a “firebreather”? I recognize the name at #87, and again a respectable time, but in no way exceptional, especially if the guy tips the scales at more than 200lbs. Then at #183, the world’s best CFer. I don’t know this guy, I’m not trying to put him down, I’m sure he’s demonstrated athleticism in many other ways. But I am qualified to say that 2K erg time is just plain slow. I’ve coached several women smaller than him to faster times, and that score would land him in the third novice eight of any competitive men’s team. And there are 4-5 CFers on the list who are slower still, and the women’s results are pretty much the same.
I am not “calling out” these people or trying to insult them. I’m sure they work very hard at what they do. I’m just pointing out that their rowing ability is far below the standard of people who specialize in rowing. But that is hardly a surprise to anyone who isn’t drinking the Kool-Aid. Incidentally, I’ve coached plenty of non-rowing specialists to respectable 2K times with methods that don’t include bouncing an Olympic bar for time (i.e., "dead lifts"), bastardized calisthenics, flailing kettlebells, or Tabata anything.