You may need them. I've got her freaking out on me in private, because everyone assumes that I'm somehow in charge around here, even though nothing could be further from the truth.The Ginger Beard Man wrote:Dude you have nothing to fear. No doubt one or more of the IGx resident attorneys will gladly represent you should legal difficulties arise as a result of showing us ANYC titties in all their uncensored glory.
The couch thread
Moderator: Dux
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 9951
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:01 pm
Re: The couch thread
Post by WildGorillaMan »
WildGorillaMan
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 14137
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:32 am
- Location: GAWD'S Country
- Contact:
Re: The couch thread
Post by Holland Oates »
HahahahahahaWildGorillaMan wrote:
You may need them. I've got her freaking out on me in private, because everyone assumes that I'm somehow in charge around here, even though nothing could be further from the truth.
Don't take the pics and send them to people if you don't want them out in public.
Holland Oates
-
- Top
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:30 pm
- Location: Between the thighs, taint, and retractable claw.
Re: The couch thread
Did she say why she sent them out to people in the first place?, out of curiousity?I've got her freaking out on me in private
My cousin is a redheaded german-mexican, we call him a beanerschnitzel
Testiclaw
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 9951
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:01 pm
Re: The couch thread
Post by WildGorillaMan »
Personally, I'm surprised it took that pic this long to surface. It's kind of like terrorists and nukes: If they could really get one they would have used it by now. By that token, the skepticism of whether there was really a topless shot, never mind nudes was grounded in a similar logic.
WildGorillaMan
-
- Staff Sergeant
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:37 pm
- Location: at the intersection of undertraining & overthinking
Re: The couch thread
Post by lesser_rebelangel »
lesser_rebelangel
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21281
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:26 pm
Re: The couch thread
Post by Shafpocalypse Now »
Shafpocalypse Now
-
- Top
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:30 pm
- Location: Between the thighs, taint, and retractable claw.
Re: The couch thread
"IGX...overflowing with soft, sensitive, reliable understanding."Shafman wrote:It's ludicrous that you fuckers are pussyfooting around like this.
My cousin is a redheaded german-mexican, we call him a beanerschnitzel
Testiclaw
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 11367
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm
Re: The couch thread
Post by Grandpa's Spells »
Exactly.Shafman wrote:It's ludicrous that you fuckers are pussyfooting around like this.
She took the pics and sent them to multiple people because she wanted them to come out. This is the equivalent of a commercial celebrity sex tape where the subject pretends to object to its release, but the law states that it couldn't have been sold in the first place unless the participants gave signed permission to the distributors.
Barky, god bless her, loves getting attention related to her tits. She knows WGM can't do anything, but that WGM will say here that she didn't want them to get out so she can keep up appearances (baby, don't do that). In a matter of days somebody will PM the uncensored photo to somebody else under the agreement that they will not repost it, who will promptly repost it, and that'll be that.
There's nothing illegal going on and everything is proceeding according to plan..
Grandpa's Spells
-
- Staff Sergeant
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:08 pm
- Location: Right Next Door to Hell
Re: The couch thread
Post by Songjabong »
in other words, (uncensored) tits or GTFO
Songjabong
Re: The couch thread
http://www.tineye.com/search/0070dac089 ... 277e961f1/
nafod
Re: The couch thread
msr2112
-
- Staff Sergeant
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:37 pm
- Location: at the intersection of undertraining & overthinking
Re: The couch thread
Post by lesser_rebelangel »
Confession time: all this was the product of a conspiracy between Mario, Dux and me to increase Nafod is a dem-bootlicking faggot and the product of an anal birth.msr2112 wrote:I must admit I'm checking this thread twice as often as before in hope that the new pic pops up.
lesser_rebelangel
-
- Sarge
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 5:32 pm
- Location: Squat Rack Somewhere
Re: The couch thread
Post by CharlieBob »
...This is possibly the most retarded thing I have ever read. You should be ashamed of yourself.lesser_rebelangel wrote:And rest assured, I'm not posting them uncensored, but it's just a matter of time before someone else does. It's a cosmic inevitability: the universe is practically willing the pics to surface--you wouldn't believe the PMs I've gotten asking for those pics.
CharlieBob
TerryB
Testiclaw
-
- Sgt. Major
- Posts: 3439
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:59 pm
- Location: Somewhere else
Re: The couch thread
Post by Mountebank »
Update: @Fers are still stupid and still clueless about programming.@F Iconz wrote:50 Front squats for time @ 85-90% of 1RM
Let's help this poor schlub out:
Prilepin's Chart
I'm guessing Louie's contributions still aren't sinking in. Imagine that.Percent.....Reps/sets.....Optimal.....Total range
80–90..........2–4..............15...........10–20
Mountebank
Re: The couch thread
I'm sure that fits intelligently to the month's training plan.Captain Quack wrote:Update: @Fers are still stupid and still clueless about programming.@F Iconz wrote:50 Front squats for time @ 85-90% of 1RM
Let's help this poor schlub out:
Prilepin's ChartI'm guessing Louie's contributions still aren't sinking in. Imagine that.Percent.....Reps/sets.....Optimal.....Total range
80–90..........2–4..............15...........10–20

TerryB
-
- Sgt. Major
- Posts: 3024
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:41 am
Re: The couch thread
Post by Gin Master »
Dux, I want my $25 back (you can keep the $0.50 I donated for our Jewish brethren). Reading lesser_angelfoodcake and WGM talk about this is like listening to the View. I didn't know the gorilla turned into Ricki Lake.Testiclaw wrote:"IGX...overflowing with soft, sensitive, reliable understanding."Shafman wrote:It's ludicrous that you fuckers are pussyfooting around like this.
Bob, songjabong, and others have this right.CharlieBob wrote:As long as the picture was taken with her consent (she took it herself) and you did not steal it from her (it was sent to you via email or text) then how are you "invading" anything?!? The only other trouble area I could think of would be if you tried to make money off the picture, but you are not doing that either.lesser_rebelangel wrote: So originally, I was just trying to be a dick, censoring the photo like that--but don't you think that there are real honest to god, invasion of privacy issues at stake with posting shit like that? True, she shared the photos with others to begin with, but she could always lie about that, change her story. I'm being completely serious. Gin Master needs to get in here and share some legal knowledges with us...
Honestly your paranoia is lame. You don't want to post it, fine, but don't feed us silly reasons like you are afraid you are breaking the law.....
1) there is no intrusion (the tort here is about the intrusion, not publication; you didn't intrude, she sent them),
2) there is no appropriation (you're not using this for trade),
3) there is no right to privacy (this is waived because she i. ordinarily seeks out publicity and ii. published the photos herself),
4) there are no fair use or copyright issues on cell phone pics that were taken voluntarily and published to a public, non-paying audience.
This wouldn't go anywhere. Even if everything went wrong and you ended up in court--which you wouldn't--exhibits 1-googol would be the pictures she posts of herself in her underwear. The first and last questions would be "so you took this picture/willingly/voluntarily/and texted it to several people you met at a fitness seminar?" Even Dale could defend this case.
Her regret (which is in doubt) after the fact does not create liability. Expectation of privacy is gone once you hit send. Sorry honey, you can't put the shit back in the horse.
Gin Master
Re: The couch thread
THANK GOD FOR THAT!!Gin Master wrote:Sorry honey, you can't put the shit back in the horse.
SHOW US SOME BOOBS!!

nafod
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 8498
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 11:59 pm
Re: The couch thread
Post by Shapecharge »
Shapecharge
TerryB
-
- Sgt. Major
- Posts: 3439
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:59 pm
- Location: Somewhere else
Re: The couch thread
Post by Mountebank »
They got taken out of the corner and dusted off after the random L-sit for time came out in the Gaymes.protobuilder wrote:whatever happened to the paralletes everyone was making back in 2008?
Mountebank
DARTH
-
- Staff Sergeant
- Posts: 395
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 11:37 pm
Re: The couch thread
Post by The man in black »
http://board.crossfit.com/showthread.php?t=70662Captain Quack wrote:Update: @Fers are still stupid and still clueless about programming.@F Iconz wrote:50 Front squats for time @ 85-90% of 1RM
Let's help this poor schlub out:
Prilepin's ChartI'm guessing Louie's contributions still aren't sinking in. Imagine that.Percent.....Reps/sets.....Optimal.....Total range
80–90..........2–4..............15...........10–20
I love how the one guy says he doesn't understand the workout annotations and yet says it looks like good programming.
The man in black
Re: The couch thread

nafod