The end of welfare as we know it?

Topics without replies are pruned every 365 days. Not moderated.

Moderator: Dux

User avatar

Topic author
Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21247
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

The end of welfare as we know it?

Post by Turdacious »

A program that puts billions of dollars in the pockets of farmers whether or not they plant a crop may disappear with hardly a protest from farm groups and the politicians who look out for their interests.

The Senate is expected to begin debate this week on a five-year farm and food aid bill that would save $9.3 billion by ending direct payments to farmers and replacing them with subsidized insurance programs for when the weather turns bad or prices go south.

The details are still to be worked out. But there's rare agreement that fixed annual subsidies of $5 billion a year for farmers are no longer feasible in this age of tight budgets and when farmers in general are enjoying record prosperity.

About 80 percent of the bill's half-trillion-dollar cost over the next five years represents nutrition programs, primarily food stamps now going to some 46 million people. About $100 billion would be devoted to crop subsidies and other farm programs.

The Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee last month approved a bill that would save $23 billion over the next decade by ending direct payments and consolidating other programs. The bill would strengthen the subsidized crop insurance program and create a program to compensate farmers for smaller, or "shallow," revenue losses, based on a five-year average, for acres actually planted.
http://news.yahoo.com/farm-bill-end-dir ... nance.html
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule

User avatar

Pinky
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7100
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 9:09 pm

Re: The end of welfare as we know it?

Post by Pinky »

This is still idiotic. First of all, the 80% spent on food stamps and other nutrition programs are 100% boondoggle. They are an insanely inefficient way to help the poor. They exist primarily to prop up farm prices.

Secondly, there's no reason for the taxpayer to subsidize farmers' insurance. Protecting them from low prices is an especially bad idea. Like nearly everything else the Department of Agriculture does, this program exists only to buy farmers' votes.

For years, one of my basic rules of voting has been to never vote for any politician who supports any farm bill. Without exception, everyone in Congress who supports ag bills is a worthless whore. (Yes, that is nearly all of them.) My rule still applies to this bill.
"The biggest problems that we’re facing right now have to do with George Bush trying to bring more and more power into the executive branch and not go through Congress at all."


KingSchmaltzBagelHour
Top
Posts: 1619
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:57 am

Re: The end of welfare as we know it?

Post by KingSchmaltzBagelHour »

I feel bad for those hardworking farmers. Going from an air-conditioned combine complete with GPS that navigates and turns itself, into an indoor pool at a 5000 sq. ft. house on a 500 acre lot must be tough. These hardworking souls are the backbone of blue collar America.
God bless them all, the arrogant cocksuckers.

User avatar

Topic author
Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21247
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

Re: The end of welfare as we know it?

Post by Turdacious »

Pinky wrote:This is still idiotic. First of all, the 80% spent on food stamps and other nutrition programs are 100% boondoggle. They are an insanely inefficient way to help the poor. They exist primarily to prop up farm prices.

Secondly, there's no reason for the taxpayer to subsidize farmers' insurance. Protecting them from low prices is an especially bad idea. Like nearly everything else the Department of Agriculture does, this program exists only to buy farmers' votes.

For years, one of my basic rules of voting has been to never vote for any politician who supports any farm bill. Without exception, everyone in Congress who supports ag bills is a worthless whore. (Yes, that is nearly all of them.) My rule still applies to this bill.
That's because you don't support clean, efficient, renewable energy made from corn. Why do you hate the planet?
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule

Post Reply