http://on.ted.com/AlmogHow can a super-thin, three-inch disk levitate something 70,000 times its own weight? In a riveting, futuristic demonstration, Boaz Almog shows how a phenomenon known as quantum locking allows a superconductor disk to float over a magnetic rail -- completely frictionlessly and with zero energy loss.
Quantum Locking
Moderator: Dux
-
Topic author - Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6638
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 6:25 pm
- Location: The Rockies
Quantum Locking
Holy fucking batman shit!
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21247
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
- Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan
Re: Quantum Locking
Is this legit or a metaphor for your last Texas camping trip?
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule
-
- Staff Sergeant
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:27 am
Re: Quantum Locking
"Electricity is flow of electrons." False.
While a neat demonstration, what's the big deal?
While a neat demonstration, what's the big deal?
Re: Quantum Locking
Didn't click, when can I expect my hover-car?
Kazuya Mishima wrote:they can pry the bacon from my cold dead hand.
-
- Gunny
- Posts: 635
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 5:12 am
Re: Quantum Locking
Explain.ecalpal wrote:"Electricity is flow of electrons." False.
-
Topic author - Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6638
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 6:25 pm
- Location: The Rockies
Re: Quantum Locking
He heard something cool in his GED class that completely trivialized this TED lectureSua Sponte wrote:Explain.ecalpal wrote:"Electricity is flow of electrons." False.
-
- Gunny
- Posts: 635
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 5:12 am
Re: Quantum Locking
Just as I suspected.
-
- Top
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:30 pm
- Location: Between the thighs, taint, and retractable claw.
Re: Quantum Locking
I'd like to hear his explanation for that, too, if he's up for it, just out of curiosity.
My cousin is a redheaded german-mexican, we call him a beanerschnitzel
Re: Quantum Locking
By definition, inside a conductor electrons are free to move, basically one per atom. In DC, electrons do flow, but not very fast. There is a combination of electron drift and exchange of energy between electrons but the energy speed outpaces the actual electron flow by many orders of magnitude. In AC, because the current is reversing very fast, the electrons don't flow, but vibrate back and forth in a small area.
"Why do we need a kitchen when we have a phone?"
-
- Gunny
- Posts: 635
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 5:12 am
Re: Quantum Locking
Not completely right, but close enough for IGx purposes. The definition of a conductor isn't quite right. Nor is the electron count necessarily so. The electron velocity without impressed voltage is thermal, but the scattering events are there anyway. Under impressed voltage the scattering events are what keep the drift velocity low.Schlegel wrote:By definition, inside a conductor electrons are free to move, basically one per atom. In DC, electrons do flow, but not very fast. There is a combination of electron drift and exchange of energy between electrons but the energy speed outpaces the actual electron flow by many orders of magnitude. In AC, because the current is reversing very fast, the electrons don't flow, but vibrate back and forth in a small area.
To the question of flow, if the electrons aren't flowing in AC, how is power delivered? BTW, the current need not be reversing very fast for the current to be AC. Any frequency will do just fine-that fact being a pointer to the answer to the question.
Re: Quantum Locking
oh shut up, SmegelSchlegel wrote:By definition, inside a conductor electrons are free to move, basically one per atom. In DC, electrons do flow, but not very fast. There is a combination of electron drift and exchange of energy between electrons but the energy speed outpaces the actual electron flow by many orders of magnitude. In AC, because the current is reversing very fast, the electrons don't flow, but vibrate back and forth in a small area.
"Know that! & Know it deep you fucking loser!"


-
- Staff Sergeant
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:27 am
Re: Quantum Locking
Don't get all butthurt. You can still pretend your model train sets are superconductor cryogenic railway systems of the future.