Sprint coverage in the Western US

Topics without replies are pruned every 365 days. Not moderated.

Moderator: Dux

User avatar

Topic author
buckethead
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 6638
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 6:25 pm
Location: The Rockies

Sprint coverage in the Western US

Post by buckethead »

Looking to possibly change from Verizon to Sprint (cost). Home in Colorado, plan to be travelling all around the western US. Any experiences?

User avatar

seeahill
Font of All Wisdom, God Damn it
Posts: 7842
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 6:07 pm
Location: The Deep Blue Sea

Re: Sprint coverage in the Western US

Post by seeahill »

Sprint does not work well in Montana. I use Verizon.
Image

User avatar

baffled
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 8873
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:56 pm

Re: Sprint coverage in the Western US

Post by baffled »

Sprint used to suck royally out here in pretty much all of Northern California. Verizon is where it's at. AT&T not much of an option either.
"Gentle in what you do, Firm in how you do it"
- Buck Brannaman

User avatar

Kraj 2.0
Gunny
Posts: 534
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:02 pm

Re: Sprint coverage in the Western US

Post by Kraj 2.0 »

The monthly savings should make up for minor issues you may encounter. I know people who have Sprint and they've never had issues getting in touch with me no matter where they were in the U.S. I've got Verizon but I pay a good $40 extra per month. I'm not really getting that much more for my money as far as coverage goes, and I'm certainly not getting more as far as plan features go.

User avatar

j-cubed
Gunny
Posts: 713
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:40 pm

Re: Sprint coverage in the Western US

Post by j-cubed »

Mostly for talking, texting or data?

I had Sprint with my family. It seemed like the data was always cutting out and was slow. My employer got me a company phone, which was verizon. Everytime I traveled, I would compare the data speeds of Sprint and Verizon, and started logging them into a spreadsheet. In at least a dozen different states.

Basically, with one exception, Sprint sucked donkey droppings. It was ALWAYS slower than Verizon, and always had fewer bars for talk. What's the point of Sprint's unlimited data if it's too slow to use it. You don't need data limits when you can't possibly download 2GB of data in a month if you tried it was so slow. To add insult to injury, they charged an extra $10 per month for smart phones because of the extra data you'd not be able to use.

Now Sprint is all messed up in 4G land too. They started using WiMax technology for 4G, but dropped that a while ago, with very little roll out. Now they are supposedly going to go to LTE, but have nothing rolled out. Basically if you have an older sprint 4G phone it will be useless in 4G, and they are not expanding their older 4G. If you have a newer 4G phone, it is useless as nothing has rolled out yet.

If you want cheap, I think some of the straight talk phones to use Verizon towers.

User avatar

Topic author
buckethead
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 6638
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 6:25 pm
Location: The Rockies

Re: Sprint coverage in the Western US

Post by buckethead »

Thanks guys. That was my concern with Sprint. Looks like I'll suck it up with Verizon.

User avatar

Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21247
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

Re: Sprint coverage in the Western US

Post by Turdacious »

http://www.cellreception.com/coverage/

The above gives a decent idea about how the coverage is in different areas.

Sprint is also doing a big transition: http://money.cnn.com/2012/05/29/technol ... /index.htm
Sprint is both Nextel and Sprint-- an area with good Nextel coverage but not good Sprint coverage suggests that data will suck (AFAIK Nextel towers are older and aren't set up for data). This may mean that phone coverage will get worse for Sprint, unless they are aggressively replacing the tech in Nextel towers with Sprint tech.

Also, from what I've heard, Sprint will tune down (not sure the technical term) their towers in some areas during off peak hours. This would tend to mean lousy data coverage and fewer bars.

My personal experience, not a lot of it out west, is that Sprint coverage isn't great outside of major metro areas.

I'm seriously considering changing coverage when my contract is up.
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule


Andy83
Sgt. Major
Posts: 2650
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:07 am

Re: Sprint coverage in the Western US

Post by Andy83 »

Tracfone! Coverage any where in the world. No contracts, no monthly statements. no nothing. Just buy cheap cards. Pay as you go and you're released from slavery!!
Obama's narcissism and arrogance is only superseded by his naivete and stupidity.

User avatar

msr2112
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 458
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:28 pm

Re: Sprint coverage in the Western US

Post by msr2112 »

I've had Sprint in NoCal for years. I always have coverage and I pretty much never drop calls.
Everybody wanna be a bodybuilder, but nobody wanna lift this heavy-ass weight!! -Ronnie Coleman

User avatar

Kraj 2.0
Gunny
Posts: 534
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:02 pm

Re: Sprint coverage in the Western US

Post by Kraj 2.0 »

msr2112 wrote:I've had Sprint in NoCal for years. I always have coverage and I pretty much never drop calls.
Exactly. These country bumpkins need to either get within cell range of civilization or muster up the cash for a satellite phone.

Post Reply