IGX

As a Brit who has spent 18 years in another culture I've come to realise over time that the UK and its inhabitants are the greatest double standard I've ever come across.

We may be far ahead in political correctness but the average person I know is very PC on the outside, but on the inside, it's exactly the opposite. It took me a long time to notice this, including noticing it in myself.

Yes, I'm drunk wrote:

This is a load of sheep dung. This is written by religious zealots that are scared of losing control of their "world".

Worse, most of it easily could have been, and probably was, published 10, 100, or even 1000 years ago. But, as always, devastation is "right around the corner"

Hell, I bet one of Chessman's relatives chiseled out a similar list 13 minutes after Christ ascended.

BucketHead wrote:

Yes, I'm drunk wrote:

This is a load of sheep dung. This is written by religious zealots that are scared of losing control of their "world".

Worse, most of it easily could have been, and probably was, published 10, 100, or even 1000 years ago. But, as always, devastation is "right around the corner"

Hell, I bet one of Chessman's relatives chiseled out a similar list 13 minutes after Christ ascended.

I believe this was written by the KGB officer Yuri Bezmenov, so no, it wasn't written by 'religious zealots', but atheistic communists instead.

You're even wrong to say it was developed in the last 1000 years. If you'd watched the video above you'd have seen that the Soviets made reading Sun Tzu compulsory, and they sourced a lot of their subversion methods from his work. So if you'd said this stuff goes back ~2500 years, you'd have been closer to the mark. Nice try though.

Good job reading my post.

And even better job understanding Sun Tzu's methods.

HAHAHAHA....

DrDonkeyLove wrote:The Telegraph

You had a mighty civilization. What has happened where you can not defend your life and property in your own home...even with a cricket bat...without the power of gov't landing on you? What is the mindset of your prosecutors who can do this to people?

It appears we still can defend ourselves in our own home:

Welby farm shooting: Couple will not face charges

A couple who were arrested after a shotgun was fired at intruders during a break-in will not face charges, the Crown Prosecution Service has said.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-le ... e-19496531

Case closed, I suppose?

yeah, said as much in my first post on this thread. The idea that we are obliged to sit by and get fucked in the arse by intruders is fucking nonsense. It one strand of the persistent idea that 'do-gooders' have ruined the country. If the country is indeed in ruins, (I think this over-states the case grossly) then failing to effectively update an economic system that worked well for the Empire and for post-war America in light of a changing world is to blame. Everything else is but a symptom.

Yes, I'm drunk wrote:The BBC is a snake pit of cultural Marxism, feeding you nonsense about 'gay rights' and 'quotas'.

Here, read this from a review of Tomas Schuman's (aka Yuri Bezemenov) Love Letter to America:

All in all, Schuman's thesis is simple. First, the Soviet Union demoralizes the United States (or its target). This is done by encouraging the disintegration of institutions and functions that have kept it together, encouraging class and race struggle, encouraging more and more functions of society to be assumed by the government, stressing the importance of relatively unimportant issues (global cooling, gay rights, equal pay for women-- in general, stressing special 'rights' for special 'interest groups') over important issues (national defense, economic stability and sustainability), and undermining the government and its agencies through the creation of anti-war and anti-proliferation groups, publishing secret information, and pouring the fuel on the fire of any scandal (like Bay of Pigs, Watergate, Pinochet, whatever).

Once a country is demoralized, it is ready for destabilization. This happens by weakening national defense and the economy. In the former, decreasing spending, limiting research, disarming and drawing down through a perception of peace and understanding. In the latter, creation of a socialist welfare state. The third stage is crisis, when the country is in turmoil and reacts irrationally, resulting in civil war, foreign invasion, or some kind of power shift. The final phase is normalization, when a pro-Communist or pro-Soviet government comes to power.

And a visual aid:



Now, for instance, go and look through a selection of recent IGX threads, and notice that the things described in the poster above are being parroted by all sorts of different people, unaware of how and why they came to think such things. You're a case study yourself, Gorby, that you can't deny.

YID, you seem to be rowing your small boat in ever-decreasing circles through dense fog (emanating mostly from your arse).

On this thread, I asserted that the BBC and much of the British media has an innate left-wing bias. Did you confuse this and think I was arguing the opposite? I'm far more left wing than right, so I'm not that entirely unhappy about this. But I do acknowledge it. I expose myself to a wide variety of mainstream news (Bill O'Reilly, the Today Programme, Bolton, Panorama, the Daily Mail, the Evening Standard, John Stewart, the Times, The Guardian, the Independent, The FT etc.) and many other sources such as the right-wing, libertarian / GOP / climate change denial and pro-gun rights shit that passes for a political viewpoint on IGx.

I also posited that the current British "official" left-wing view is incorrect in the strength of its assertions of glass ceilings and discrimination.

But you boldly assert that I am in fact a willing receptacle of foreign propoganda aimed at weakening Britain. That I parrot viewpoints the origins of which are shrouded in mystery to me, but which you perceive with superior intellect to spring from a wicked enemy playing the long game at destroying our green and pleasant land.

Do I understand you correctly? Are you really that much of a fucking whack-job asshole?

Gorbachev wrote:YID, you seem to be rowing your small boat in ever-decreasing circles through dense fog (emanating mostly from your arse).

On this thread, I asserted that the BBC and much of the British media has an innate left-wing bias. Did you confuse this and think I was arguing the opposite? I'm far more left wing than right, so I'm not that entirely unhappy about this. But I do acknowledge it. I expose myself to a wide variety of mainstream news (Bill O'Reilly, the Today Programme, Bolton, Panorama, the Daily Mail, the Evening Standard, John Stewart, the Times, The Guardian, the Independent, The FT etc.) and many other sources such as the right-wing, libertarian / GOP / climate change denial and pro-gun rights shit that passes for a political viewpoint on IGx.

I also posited that the current British "official" left-wing view is incorrect in the strength of its assertions of glass ceilings and discrimination.

But you boldly assert that I am in fact a willing receptacle of foreign propoganda aimed at weakening Britain. That I parrot viewpoints the origins of which are shrouded in mystery to me, but which you perceive with superior intellect to spring from a wicked enemy playing the long game at destroying our green and pleasant land.

Do I understand you correctly? Are you really that much of a fucking whack-job asshole?

I never said the BBC wasn't left-wing. It's a Marxist institution, it could be nothing less. And the fact you recognize this and don't object to it is a disgrace. The BBC is meant to be impartial - indeed, as it asserts in it's own published editorial guidelines:

Impartiality lies at the heart of public service and is the core of the BBC's commitment to its audiences. It applies to all our output and services - television, radio, online, and in our international services and commercial magazines. We must be inclusive, considering the broad perspective and ensuring the existence of a range of views is appropriately reflected.

The fact that someone as partial and left-wing as you even admits to this is damning enough. That darling of the left and BBC journo Andrew Marr let the cat out of the bag when he wrote, where else, but in The Guardian:

And the final answer, frankly, is the vigorous use of state power to coerce and repress. It may be my Presbyterian background, but I firmly believe that repression can be a great, civilising instrument for good. Stamp hard on certain 'natural' beliefs for long enough and you can almost kill them off. The police are first in line to be burdened further, but a new Race Relations Act will impose the will of the state on millions of other lives too.

And my point about Oxbridge is that it's the illusion of inclusiveness that you yourself fall for that is so corrosive. No institution, be it the Marxist elite at The Gaurdian or the BBC, or the old-boys network at the universities, represents your interests. But you're still happy to parrot their propaganda that you're well served by it!

The normal people, just trying to bring up their kids with decent moral standards and a hope that those same kids can get on in life, and kept down by a pincer movement from both sides. Look at the banker's scandal just in Britain. What's changed? Nothing! Because the vested interest are looking after themselves. This is all basic stuff, that after a while starts to sound like people whinging, but it's true. To paraphrase Stalin, steal £10 and your a criminal, steal a billion and you get a knighthood!

There's a bigger narrative here, and it's called cultural-Marxism. Learn about it, and do something about it. I'm not your enemy, and you're not mine. But the insidious agenda of the queers and feminists have normal folk tearing themselves to shit. And that's just the goal the commie bastards want. Don't succumb to it. Fight it. And fight it while you still can!

Is that code for asking Gorby on a date?

YID, you're the one who has fallen for a simplified vision of Britain. Not me. The insidious agenda of the queers and feminists? The cultural Marxists at the BBC?

Jesus Christ, man. Get a fucking grip. There are people we don't agree with. There are people more successful than us. There are people who led banks into quicksand and haven't "gone to jail" like the Sun thinks they should. There's no fucking conspiracy. It's just a fluid democracy with opinionated arseholes in the media (surprise surprise), banks we HAVE to bail out, cos of their importance to our system and it's fucking life. Deal with it. Don't be such a nascent fucking fascist as to sit there spewing caustic bile about the insiders denying and manipulating. That's shit that gets into your head and justifies you being the angry twat who can't do anything for himself. Don't be that twat. Don't infect your kids with this learned helplessness, bitterness and bullshit.

Gorby says "sure, dinner sounds divine"

Gorbachev wrote:YID, you're the one who has fallen for a simplified vision of Britain. Not me. The insidious agenda of the queers and feminists? The cultural Marxists at the BBC?

Jesus Christ, man. Get a fucking grip. There are people we don't agree with. There are people more successful than us. There are people who led banks into quicksand and haven't "gone to jail" like the Sun thinks they should. There's no fucking conspiracy. It's just a fluid democracy with opinionated arseholes in the media (surprise surprise), banks we HAVE to bail out, cos of their importance to our system and it's fucking life. Deal with it. Don't be such a nascent fucking fascist as to sit there spewing caustic bile about the insiders denying and manipulating. That's shit that gets into your head and justifies you being the angry twat who can't do anything for himself. Don't be that twat. Don't infect your kids with this learned helplessness, bitterness and bullshit.

So you're asking me to believe that people with the money and power don't rig the game to make it that they keep the money and the power?

LOL! So it's just a coincidence that in a population of 314,323,000 people, a father and son team make up the 41st and 43rd presidents of the United States? And the Americans have the gall to make the (false) accusation that our system of government is organised along hereditary principles!

Wake up Gorby.