Moderator: Dux
Dunn wrote:Blaidd Drwg wrote:
Never seen one show aggression towards their own family.....Now if you're outside the family, well...sorry, Bro.
Same can be said for a lot of breeds.
Blaidd Drwg wrote:Dunn wrote:Blaidd Drwg wrote:
Never seen one show aggression towards their own family.....Now if you're outside the family, well...sorry, Bro.
Same can be said for a lot of breeds.
This is true of dogs in general. I think that's why we love them. Their capacity for loyalty far exceeds our own.
Gorbachev wrote:
And "ButterCupPowerRanch" is a toxically gay handle, hombre!
A CDC study on fatal dog bites lists the breeds involved in fatal attacks over 20 years (Breeds of dogs involved in fatal human attacks in the United States between 1979 and 1998 Adobe PDF file). It does not identify specific breeds that are most likely to bite or kill, and thus is not appropriate for policy-making decisions related to the topic. Each year, 4.7 million Americans are bitten by dogs. These bites result in approximately 16 fatalities; about 0.0002 percent of the total number of people bitten. These relatively few fatalities offer the only available information about breeds involved in dog bites. There is currently no accurate way to identify the number of dogs of a particular breed, and consequently no measure to determine which breeds are more likely to bite or kill.
LOLGorbachev wrote:Yo, EZ. How the back hair coming along? Is it ginger?
You just got served, retards.Studies indicate that pit bull-type dogs were involved in approximately a third of human DBRF (i.e., dog bite related fatalities) reported during the 12-year period from 1981 through1992, and Rottweilers were responsible for about half of human DBRF reported during the 4 years from 1993 through 1996....[T]he data indicate that Rottweilers and pit bull-type dogs accounted for 67% of human DBRF in the United States between 1997 and 1998. It is extremely unlikely that they accounted for anywhere near 60% of dogs in the United States during that same period and, thus, there appears to be a breed-specific problem with fatalities.
(Sacks JJ, Sinclair L, Gilchrist J, Golab GC, Lockwood R. Breeds of dogs involved in fatal human attacks in the United States between 1979 and 1998. JAVMA 2000;217:836-840.)
You get schooled and then bitch about me not being your dancing monkey. LOL. Stew in piss, fucktard. You're a mouthbreathing ignoramus who got exposed for spewing nonsense. What part of the quote from the study do you not get? I'll make it into a crayon drawing so you can understand it.Blaidd Drwg wrote:Couldn't manage to read the conclusion or the data set could you, fucktard?
Your toxic idiocy is so much more persistent than your entertainment value that has waned to near zero.
You can post images you run across while looking for your usual qu33r p0rn but you can't highlight what exactly I didn't read. You know why? Because you're the imbecile who read the quote wrong, jumped to conclusions, and are now posting childish images to cover up for the fact that you got shitted on bigtime by me.Blaidd Drwg wrote:Belated Congrats on your graduation!
How's that AA degree coming along?
I'd rather be a Turkish anything than a white trash country bumpkin like yourself. But while we're on the subject, my father had a dog that would eat your peanut-butter-dick-licking wannabe-badass dog alive.Blaidd Drwg wrote:While we're on the subject of turkish anal rape babies, would you say you inherited your father's irrational fear and hatred of dogs?
True White - The kind of genes Hitler fapped tomilosz wrote:wait, kraj isn't even white?
True White - The kind of genes Hitler fapped tomilosz wrote:wait, kraj isn't even white?
How do you stop a dog from humping your leg?Fat Cat wrote:
And if you read the fucking data, so called "protection type dogs" (Dobies,German Shepards and the like) comprised nearly as many incidents of (53) DBRFs.Conclusions—Although fatal attacks on humans appear to be a breed-specific problem (pit bull-typedogs and Rottweilers), other breeds may bite and cause fatalities at higher rates. Because of difficulties inherent in determining a dog’s breed with certainty, enforcement of breed-specific ordinances raises constitutional and practical issues. Fatal attacks represent a small proportion of dog bite injuries to humans and,therefore, should not be the primary factor drivingpublic policy concerning dangerous dogs. Many practical alternatives to breed-specific ordinances exist and hold promise for prevention of dog bites. (J Am VetMed Assoc2000;217:836–840)
The richness of an illegitimate turk bastard such as yourself casting assignations. My White ancestors were here before the fucking Mayflower, you churl.A CDC study on fatal dog bites lists the breeds involved in fatal attacks over 20 years (Breeds of dogs involved in fatal human attacks in the United States between 1979 and 1998 Adobe PDF file). It does not identify specific breeds that are most likely to bite or kill, and thus is not appropriate for policy-making decisions related to the topic. Each year, 4.7 million Americans are bitten by dogs. These bites result in approximately 16 fatalities; about 0.0002 percent of the total number of people bitten. These relatively few fatalities offer the only available information about breeds involved in dog bites. There is currently no accurate way to identify the number of dogs of a particular breed, and consequently no measure to determine which breeds are more likely to bite or kill.
that's a leonberger. those guys are sweet and gentle. we've had several. we're down to one male at the moment.Kraj 2.0 wrote: my father had a dog that would eat your peanut-butter-dick-licking wannabe-badass dog alive.
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.
