USA = Nasty Motherfuckers (according to the CDC)

Topics without replies are pruned every 365 days. Not moderated.

Moderator: Dux

User avatar

Topic author
Kazuya Mishima
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 6394
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 10:11 pm

USA = Nasty Motherfuckers (according to the CDC)

Post by Kazuya Mishima »


User avatar

Pinky
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7100
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 9:09 pm

Re: USA = Nasty Motherfuckers (according to the CDC)

Post by Pinky »

They're just jealous they're not getting any.
"The biggest problems that we’re facing right now have to do with George Bush trying to bring more and more power into the executive branch and not go through Congress at all."

User avatar

Grandpa's Spells
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 11367
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm

Re: USA = Nasty Motherfuckers (according to the CDC)

Post by Grandpa's Spells »

CNS News is not journalism.

Notice how they don't point out if, for example, infection rates are going up. They just make an apples to oranges comparison, click "publish" and collect clicks.
One of the downsides of the Internet is that it allows like-minded people to form communities, and sometimes those communities are stupid.

User avatar

Pinky
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7100
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 9:09 pm

Re: USA = Nasty Motherfuckers (according to the CDC)

Post by Pinky »

Grandpa's Spells wrote:Notice how they don't point out if, for example, infection rates are going up.
The CDC publication they cite also fails to mention whether infection rates are increasing.
"The biggest problems that we’re facing right now have to do with George Bush trying to bring more and more power into the executive branch and not go through Congress at all."

User avatar

Grandpa's Spells
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 11367
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm

Re: USA = Nasty Motherfuckers (according to the CDC)

Post by Grandpa's Spells »

Pinky wrote:
Grandpa's Spells wrote:Notice how they don't point out if, for example, infection rates are going up.
The CDC publication they cite also fails to mention whether infection rates are increasing.
Another clue!
One of the downsides of the Internet is that it allows like-minded people to form communities, and sometimes those communities are stupid.

User avatar

Topic author
Kazuya Mishima
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 6394
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 10:11 pm

Re: USA = Nasty Motherfuckers (according to the CDC)

Post by Kazuya Mishima »


User avatar

Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21247
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

Re: USA = Nasty Motherfuckers (according to the CDC)

Post by Turdacious »

Pinky wrote:
Grandpa's Spells wrote:Notice how they don't point out if, for example, infection rates are going up.
The CDC publication they cite also fails to mention whether infection rates are increasing.
It can be easily inferred:
The most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States in 2008 was human papillomavirus (HPV), which caused 14,100,000 estimated infections that year.
It is obviously the @fit.
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule

User avatar

Bob Wildes
Top
Posts: 1831
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:22 pm
Location: Heart Of Darkness

Re: USA = Nasty Motherfuckers (according to the CDC)

Post by Bob Wildes »

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well that's one advantage to growing old and ugly. :supz: At least I got that going for me. :axe:
"Tell A.P. Hill he must come up."

User avatar

DrDonkeyLove
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 8034
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 4:04 am
Location: Deep in a well

Re: USA = Nasty Motherfuckers (according to the CDC)

Post by DrDonkeyLove »

According to new data released by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there were 19.7 million new venereal infections in the United States in 2008, bringing the total number of existing sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the U.S. at that time to 110,197,000.
Sometimes I like to do some quick (and often wrong) math when I see statistics that startle me.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL POPULATION / SEXUALLY DISEASED POPULATION
US Population..........................313,914,000
Sexually Diseased Population...110,197,000


AGE GROUPS PROBABLY NOT CONTRIBUTING VERY MUCH TO OUR SEXUAL DISEASEATOPIA
6.8% of the population is under 16 y.o. = 21,346,152
13.3% of the population is over 65 y.o. = 41,750,562
Total number of less likely contributors = 63,096,714

TOTAL POPULATION (-) LESS LIKELY SEXUALLY DISEASED
313,914,000 - 63,096,714 = 250,817,286 potentially likely to be diseased

PERCENTAGE OF THOSE LIKELY TO BE SEXUALLY ACTIVE WHO ARE TAINTED BY SEXUAL DISEASE
110,197,000 / 250,817,286 = 44% of those in the most sexually active years are diseased mother fuckers.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Am I to believe that almost half of the adults I see daily are sexually infected or am I misunderstanding something you statistical mofo's can school me on?

This feels very wrong to me - and it burns when I pee, and swallow, and shit.
Mao wrote:Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. Our principle is that the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party

Post Reply