IGX

West Michigan? Lol! Hate is strong!

Nigger hate is strong east of the Mississippi. West, not so much. While their eyes are blind from lack of exposure to the beast, they should consider themselves lucky not to be neck deep in the coonworks.

WTF, people hate cripples? Or is that cripples hating us regular folk?

Yes but if these people were really racist then you would see a lot of red for "Gooks" and "Spics" and others, It's the "niggers" that get all the hate.

That's because niggers suck, they ruin everything around them and no one but other niggers and aspiring niggers like them.

And you know who really hates them? Besides Kaz of coarse, it's black people! Black people hate niggers more than any of them but too many of them are afraid to say that to the rest of us.

See Liberal logic looks at this and thinks "America is full of racist!

Aliens would look at this and say "They must have a lot of problems with these "Niggers" they are texting about.

A recent study by two Swedish economists has shed light on the world's most and least racially tolerant countries, and the results might surprise you. While the United States is ranked among the most tolerant on the globe (some may find this predictable, others may not), Europe presents a greater range of tolerance levels, with several countries in the second and third least tolerant ranges.

http://www.policymic.com/articles/42729 ... -countries

I seem to be accounting for the nigger hate in northern California.

Mississippi has an unexpected dearth of hostility for the children of mother Africa. Perhaps they're too dignified or savvy to use pejoratives on line. Or, maybe, they don't do a lot of internetten down thea.

Wait, some of you actually use Twitter?

I have to, but I don't put racist shit on there.

baffled wrote:I have to, but I don't put racist shit on there.

"Nigger" is not racist unless you apply it to most black people but with what you do for a living, you don't need to eat shit from the brainwashed that can cost you money.

Fucking overswing.

Yes racism was wrong, Jim Crow was wrong, Segregation based on race was wrong.

The 80's was the best time of balance. You could use the word nigger and not eat shit and most white people knew you could differentiate between a black person and a nigger.

Did'nt we free them, give them equal rights? Why the fuck do we have to be careful?

How about a Thank you! Not like it was in our best interest. It was the moral thing to do but I wonder if in 64 if those people knew what they do now if we'd be so benevolent?

You can zoom in. Their stats are goofy and weighted for population. If you oom in on West Michigan, you can see specifically where the hate originates. Lol. Ferris Stte University for one

Second, the assumption that the word 'nigger' is always used in a racist context is wrong.

Blaidd Drwg wrote:

A recent study by two Swedish economists has shed light on the world's most and least racially tolerant countries, and the results might surprise you. While the United States is ranked among the most tolerant on the globe (some may find this predictable, others may not), Europe presents a greater range of tolerance levels, with several countries in the second and third least tolerant ranges.

http://www.policymic.com/articles/42729 ... -countries

I wonder if the researchers considered asking more than a single question to determine racial attitudes because I am fairly certain that there is more than tolerance than being homogeneous or having other things that you hate people worse for.

Terry B. wrote:

Blaidd Drwg wrote:

A recent study by two Swedish economists has shed light on the world's most and least racially tolerant countries, and the results might surprise you. While the United States is ranked among the most tolerant on the globe (some may find this predictable, others may not), Europe presents a greater range of tolerance levels, with several countries in the second and third least tolerant ranges.

http://www.policymic.com/articles/42729 ... -countries

I wonder if the researchers considered asking more than a single question to determine racial attitudes because I am fairly certain that there is more than tolerance than being homogeneous or having other things that you hate people worse for.

They are Swedish. They like simple functional DIY furniture and easily digested statistics.

Blaidd Drwg wrote:

Terry B. wrote:

Blaidd Drwg wrote:

A recent study by two Swedish economists has shed light on the world's most and least racially tolerant countries, and the results might surprise you. While the United States is ranked among the most tolerant on the globe (some may find this predictable, others may not), Europe presents a greater range of tolerance levels, with several countries in the second and third least tolerant ranges.

http://www.policymic.com/articles/42729 ... -countries

I wonder if the researchers considered asking more than a single question to determine racial attitudes because I am fairly certain that there is more than tolerance than being homogeneous or having other things that you hate people worse for.

They are Swedish. They like simple functional DIY furniture and easily digested statistics.

Unlikely, Terry. If they had real research skills and a solid grasp of scientific method they never would have gone into sociology in the first place.

Why didn't they provide mapping for "honkey" and "cracker"? Only white people can hate?

Kazuya Mishima wrote:Why didn't they provide mapping for "honkey" and "cracker"? Only white people can hate?

Shush now, that's not part of the narrative.

Shafpocalypse Now wrote:You can zoom in. Their stats are goofy and weighted for population. If you oom in on West Michigan, you can see specifically where the hate originates. Lol. Ferris Stte University for one

Second, the assumption that the word '******' is always used in a racist context is wrong.

Determining the context of a word in a sentence programatically is one of the hardest things to do in the computer science world.

kreator wrote:

Shafpocalypse Now wrote:You can zoom in. Their stats are goofy and weighted for population. If you oom in on West Michigan, you can see specifically where the hate originates. Lol. Ferris Stte University for one

Second, the assumption that the word '******' is always used in a racist context is wrong.

Determining the context of a word in a sentence programatically is one of the hardest things to do in the computer science world.

I thought so, too. But they accounted for that.

Because algorithmic sentiment analysis would automatically classify any tweet containing 'hate words' as "negative," this project relied upon the HSU students to read the entirety of tweet and classify it as positive, neutral or negative based on a predefined rubric. Only those tweets that were identified by human readers as negative were used in this analysis.

Gin Master wrote:

kreator wrote:

Shafpocalypse Now wrote:You can zoom in. Their stats are goofy and weighted for population. If you oom in on West Michigan, you can see specifically where the hate originates. Lol. Ferris Stte University for one

Second, the assumption that the word '******' is always used in a racist context is wrong.

Determining the context of a word in a sentence programatically is one of the hardest things to do in the computer science world.

I thought so, too. But they accounted for that.

Because algorithmic sentiment analysis would automatically classify any tweet containing 'hate words' as "negative," this project relied upon the HSU students to read the entirety of tweet and classify it as positive, neutral or negative based on a predefined rubric. Only those tweets that were identified by human readers as negative were used in this analysis.

Ah ok.

map reminds me i need to tweet more about faggot ass gooks in wheelchairs.