Anybody cut back on their news intake?
Moderator: Dux
-
Topic author - Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 11367
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm
Anybody cut back on their news intake?
Post by Grandpa's Spells »
I see this in people I know who have Fox News on all day (Fox Geezer Syndrome is real), but I have a number of RSS feeds I read throughout the day, and there's usually a fair amount of complaining going on.
Tim Ferriss talks about not consuming news as it's usually a time waster, but his endorsing the idea actually makes me want to do the opposite.
Experiences?
Grandpa's Spells
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 5884
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:29 am
- Location: Surrounded by short irrational people
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
Miss Piggy wrote:Never eat more than you can lift.
syaigh
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 22165
- Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 2:49 pm
- Location: The Pale Blue Dot
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
Post by Mickey O'neil »
Mickey O'neil
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
The intake required to stay up on truly important issues - and if studies are correct, to be better informed about reality than someone who just listens to Fox News or MSNBC constantly - is rather small. Ten minutes a day tops, the BBC website or BBC World Service radio, the Google News front page.
milosz
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 9951
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:01 pm
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
Post by WildGorillaMan »
WildGorillaMan
-
Topic author - Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 11367
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
Post by Grandpa's Spells »
For sure, but when you got category by category, there's a lot of crap:milosz wrote:If you're worried about staying informed and being knowledgable, you'd still do well to completely ignore political process stories. That's 90% of what the bad media - Fox, MSNBC, etc. - sells you. That shit isn't news.
Health news: garbage
International news: sensationalist
Financial news: irrelevant/sensationalist/garbage
I'm going to tune out for a while.
Grandpa's Spells
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6638
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 6:25 pm
- Location: The Rockies
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
Post by buckethead »
Yet, I have yet to be caught "unaware" of something truly newsworthy.
In today's world, real news will find you.
buckethead
-
- Sgt. Major
- Posts: 3024
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:41 am
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
Post by Gin Master »
Same here. I haven't watched a news program in about five years. Sometimes I'll go down a youtube rabbit trail looking for Robin Meade's tits or something, but that's about it. I have honestly spent more time watching jungle battles on world star hip hop than I have anything on Fox/CNN/MSNBC. If it's important enough, I'll see it on Facebook or here. That sounds awful, but I'm as informed as I need to be and don't have to sift through the garbage.BucketHead wrote:I have made no conscious effort in the last 3 years to seek out "news". I don't flip to news channels, I don't subscribe to news feeds, and I don't read newspapers or magazines.
Yet, I have yet to be caught "unaware" of something truly newsworthy.
In today's world, real news will find you.
Gin Master
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
YES. The common perception is that we can consume media without any type of effect, it just passes through us. You hear arguments to the contrary all the time: "violent media doesn't make you violent" or "pornography won't affect my views of women" but that is not true. I don't pass judgment on other people's choices, but I try to be both aware of, and somewhat careful with, my media choices. We are all far more impressionable than we like to admit and that's true of our choices in personal association as well, environment, etc.Grandpa's Spells wrote:I was reading an interview with James Altucher, who's kind of quacky, but he pointed out during a talk about avoiding negativity that never consuming news is a good idea. The idea being that news organizations typically sell everything as "THE WORST THING EVER," even though this is never the case.
I see this in people I know who have Fox News on all day (Fox Geezer Syndrome is real), but I have a number of RSS feeds I read throughout the day, and there's usually a fair amount of complaining going on.
Tim Ferriss talks about not consuming news as it's usually a time waster, but his endorsing the idea actually makes me want to do the opposite.
Experiences?
On a more subtle level, news is designed to provide an illusion of control over things but you have no control over civil war in Syria, a pulmonary disease spreading in Saudi Arabia, melting polar ice caps, fucking al-Qaeda, etc. and preoccupation with these things causes additional allostatic load on your organism and makes it more difficult to focus on the small-scale, immediate challenges which you DO have the capacity to affect. We should expend our energy looking after the people and things around us.

"That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy.
It is our job to see that it stays there." - George Orwell
Fat Cat
-
- Top
- Posts: 1619
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:57 am
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
Post by KingSchmaltzBagelHour »
I find it amusing how much people buy into the bullshit. The MSNBC guys parrot that bullshit, the Fox News guys parrot that bullshit.
Two sides of the same coin, but what can you say or do without sounding like a pompous assbag? Fats has it right, just take care of you and yours and try to be the best influence you can be on your friends and family.
KingSchmaltzBagelHour
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
One of the better things I've read on here in awhile.Fat Cat wrote:YES. The common perception is that we can consume media without any type of effect, it just passes through us. You hear arguments to the contrary all the time: "violent media doesn't make you violent" or "pornography won't affect my views of women" but that is not true. I don't pass judgment on other people's choices, but I try to be both aware of, and somewhat careful with, my media choices. We are all far more impressionable than we like to admit and that's true of our choices in personal association as well, environment, etc.Grandpa's Spells wrote:I was reading an interview with James Altucher, who's kind of quacky, but he pointed out during a talk about avoiding negativity that never consuming news is a good idea. The idea being that news organizations typically sell everything as "THE WORST THING EVER," even though this is never the case.
I see this in people I know who have Fox News on all day (Fox Geezer Syndrome is real), but I have a number of RSS feeds I read throughout the day, and there's usually a fair amount of complaining going on.
Tim Ferriss talks about not consuming news as it's usually a time waster, but his endorsing the idea actually makes me want to do the opposite.
Experiences?
On a more subtle level, news is designed to provide an illusion of control over things but you have no control over civil war in Syria, a pulmonary disease spreading in Saudi Arabia, melting polar ice caps, fucking al-Qaeda, etc. and preoccupation with these things causes additional allostatic load on your organism and makes it more difficult to focus on the small-scale, immediate challenges which you DO have the capacity to affect. We should expend our energy looking after the people and things around us.

TerryB
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
So, you're in good company.
lasalle
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 7502
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:12 am
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
Post by ___________ »
Knowledge bomb right there.WildGorillaMan wrote:Twitter and an innate ability to know when someone is pissing on your leg and telling you it's raining.
___________
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
This. Especially "Global Warming" horseshit... helping out a neighbor or providing advice to a confused kid is something you can do.Fat Cat wrote:On a more subtle level, news is designed to provide an illusion of control over things but you have no control over civil war in Syria, a pulmonary disease spreading in Saudi Arabia, melting polar ice caps, fucking al-Qaeda, etc. and preoccupation with these things causes additional allostatic load on your organism and makes it more difficult to focus on the small-scale, immediate challenges which you DO have the capacity to affect. We should expend our energy looking after the people and things around us.
Gene
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
This.syaigh wrote:I stopped watching the news with regularity around the time I had my kids. It seemed every day there was something horrible being done to a baby and I couldn't really deal with that very well as a new mother.
Working in emergency services I had already cut back on my news consumption to lessen my stress load, but now that I've had the mini juggernaut I don't watch anything more hardcore than Sesame Street most days. I don't have any coping mechanism for stories about people doing awful things to children.
Kazuya Mishima wrote:they can pry the bacon from my cold dead hand.
Sassenach
-
- Starship Trooper
- Posts: 7670
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 3:58 am
- Location: Pumping Elizebeth Shue's Ass!
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
Post by Batboy2/75 »
I know a lot of Liberals, Conservatives, and Independents that would be better off unplugging from the instant doom and gloom message the news media sells.
I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.

Batboy2/75
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
That's the part of my job that I'm trying to get rid of.
- Buck Brannaman
baffled
-
- Top
- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:57 am
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
Post by Yes, I'm drunk »
lasalle wrote:...self professed genius Nassim Taleb...

Yes, I'm drunk
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21281
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:26 pm
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
Post by Shafpocalypse Now »
Shafpocalypse Now
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
TomFurman
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 9951
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:01 pm
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
Post by WildGorillaMan »
Shafpocalypse Now wrote:Taleb fucking loves how smart he is, doesn't he? I bet he's never been punched in the mouth.
More of same:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/d538a45a-4871 ... z2VZeMOULZ
Who is my mentor? I have inverse mentors: people I learnt to not imitate,’ says the scholar and philosopher
WildGorillaMan
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6638
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 6:25 pm
- Location: The Rockies
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
Post by buckethead »
WildGorillaMan wrote:Shafpocalypse Now wrote:Taleb fucking loves how smart he is, doesn't he? I bet he's never been punched in the mouth.How physically fit are you?
I lift heavy weights and sprint but I am so bad at it that I develop severe injuries. Like now.
buckethead
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 9951
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:01 pm
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
Post by WildGorillaMan »
I can't wait for his 1400 page @fit Journal article.BucketHead wrote:WildGorillaMan wrote:Shafpocalypse Now wrote:Taleb fucking loves how smart he is, doesn't he? I bet he's never been punched in the mouth.How physically fit are you?
I lift heavy weights and sprint but I am so bad at it that I develop severe injuries. Like now.
WildGorillaMan
-
- Top
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:30 pm
- Location: Between the thighs, taint, and retractable claw.
Re: Anybody cut back on their news intake?
My cousin is a redheaded german-mexican, we call him a beanerschnitzel
Testiclaw