IGX

I would listen

I'd like to bite that mole off of her face.

Fucking entitled Lib cunts arguing over no abortions after 20 weeks!

If you can't figure out you are pregnant and what you want to do in half that, fuck you cunt, your too stupid to live yourself so we should do you a favour and give you an abortion by throwing you off a cliff.

I don't think the 20 week limit is really the issue. It's the upgrading of clinics to include a "surgical center" that has most everyone upset. This would virtually wipe out all of the clinics throughout the state due to the expense required to upgrade them. I believe the state has 47 clinics, 5 of which have a surgical center. So you can see the effect it would have but if you're not down with abortion in any way shape or form then this doesn't matter.

What's up with people who bitch about all the dregs and scum at the bottom of the social ladder but then balk at one of the most obvious ways of thinning the herd?

WildGorillaMan wrote:What's up with people who bitch about all the dregs and scum at the bottom of the social ladder but then balk at one of the most obvious ways of thinning the herd?

Because believe it or not I do think everyone has a chance to prove themselves a decent person and even if you come from scum does not mean you have to be.

I'm not allowed to just kill many of the low life sub humans I see and are with in my capabilities to do so so I don't think past 3 months, when most agree you have a feeling, conscious human being that some twat can just have it killed because it's a "mistake".

Rubbers, pills, IUDs, Jelly, close her legs, don't fuck someone you would not want to breed with, lot's of options before a stab in the head and the shop vac to a child.

When they are scum, the way to thin the herd is stop given them assistance, opnely call them out as the Troggs they are, stop caring when they get shot by each other or their betters and when convicted of crimes, keep them locked away forever or kill them.

It amazes me many of the same people are pro abortion all up the line also have a problem with executing some beast that kills decent folks.

Under 3 months, fine, the girl can take it out, after, the bitch should be killed for murder. There, herd thinned.

DARTH wrote:

WildGorillaMan wrote:What's up with people who bitch about all the dregs and scum at the bottom of the social ladder but then balk at one of the most obvious ways of thinning the herd?

Because believe it or not I do think everyone has a chance to prove themselves a decent person and even if you come from scum does not mean you have to be.

I'm not allowed to just kill many of the low life sub humans I see and are with in my capabilities to do so so I don't think past 3 months, when most agree you have a feeling, conscious human being that some twat can just have it killed because it's a "mistake".

Rubbers, pills, IUDs, Jelly, close her legs, don't fuck someone you would not want to breed with, lot's of options before a stab in the head and the shop vac to a child.

When they are scum, the way to thin the herd is stop given them assistance, opnely call them out as the Troggs they are, stop caring when they get shot by each other or their betters and when convicted of crimes, keep them locked away forever or kill them.

It amazes me many of the same people are pro abortion all up the line also have a problem with executing some beast that kills decent folks.

Under 3 months, fine, the girl can take it out, after, the bitch should be killed for murder. There, herd thinned.

This is straight up a George Carlin skit.

Shapecharge wrote:I don't think the 20 week limit is really the issue. It's the upgrading of clinics to include a "surgical center" that has most everyone upset. This would virtually wipe out all of the clinics throughout the state due to the expense required to upgrade them. I believe the state has 47 clinics, 5 of which have a surgical center. So you can see the effect it would have but if you're not down with abortion in any way shape or form then this doesn't matter.

I think that was the major issue here in VA too. Kind of sad, considering the Gosnell case-- a surgical center would seem to be as far from a back alley as possible.

DARTH wrote:

Because believe it or not I do think everyone has a chance to prove themselves a decent person and even if you come from scum does not mean you have to be.

I'm not allowed to just kill many of the low life sub humans I see and are with in my capabilities to do so so I don't think past 3 months, when most agree you have a feeling, conscious human being that some twat can just have it killed because it's a "mistake".

Rubbers, pills, IUDs, Jelly, close her legs, don't fuck someone you would not want to breed with, lot's of options before a stab in the head and the shop vac to a child.

When they are scum, the way to thin the herd is stop given them assistance, opnely call them out as the Troggs they are, stop caring when they get shot by each other or their betters and when convicted of crimes, keep them locked away forever or kill them.

It amazes me many of the same people are pro abortion all up the line also have a problem with executing some beast that kills decent folks.

Under 3 months, fine, the girl can take it out, after, the bitch should be killed for murder. There, herd thinned.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmneawpAA4w[/youtube]

Turdacious wrote:I think that was the major issue here in VA too. Kind of sad, considering the Gosnell case-- a surgical center would seem to be as far from a back alley as possible.

The proper policy remedy, then, would be to provide funds - even low-interest loans - for clinics to upgrade to 'ambulatory surgical centers.'

milosz wrote:

Turdacious wrote:I think that was the major issue here in VA too. Kind of sad, considering the Gosnell case-- a surgical center would seem to be as far from a back alley as possible.

The proper policy remedy, then, would be to provide funds - even low-interest loans - for clinics to upgrade to 'ambulatory surgical centers.'

Or pressure them to implement better financial management so they can pay for it themselves-- PP's donations are up.

Well, just saying.

I have two very close friends who terminated pregnancies after their 20 week ultrasounds due to devastating birth defects that weren't diagnosable earlier.

I have known at least three women acquaintances who have delivered dead or dying babies due to undiagnosable-by-ultrasound birth defects.

I've known women who have known of severe birth defects and chose to deliver anyway and watch their children ail and die within 6 months of birth.

It was horrible, tragic, and awful.

I wouldn't wish any of those situations on anyone.

Let them make those decisions with a doctor.

As far as those who would use it as birth control, well, they would probably kill them anyway and are unfit to procreate. My husband is an ER doc, my best friend is a nurse in the Navy and I've heard some pretty awful stories from both of them.

But, outlawing it won't do much to make it stop.

The same politicians who want to outlaw abortion also want to outlaw sex education and birth control options in schools. Fuck them. not everyone is rich, white, and/or raised in a supportive household.

syaigh wrote:The same politicians who want to outlaw abortion also want to outlaw sex education and birth control options in schools. Fuck them.

Yes.

I believe that reducing the abortion rate across the board should be a KPI for the people running the health programmes of any state. If proposals to ban, or severely limit, women's access to abortions were combined with increases in funding for comprehensive health education and pre-school, I could even support the plan. However, hearing people thump their Bibles as rationale for banning abortion while delighting their 500th state-sponsored execution in the past three decades is a bit much.

Republican committee on contraception:

Testiclaw wrote:Republican committee on contraception:

How sad is it that they are the only ones trying to protect vulnerable women from back alleys?

Question: in American history, when were back-alley abortions the most prevalent?

Testiclaw wrote:Question: in American history, when were back-alley abortions the most prevalent?

When Democrats controlled Congress.

I take that to mean that you don't have enough verifiable information regarding numbers of "back-alley abortions" in terms of absolute or as a percentage of population in order to successfully back up any ludicrous claim that outlawing abortion or severely restricting access to abortion via vicious legislation will increase said "back-alley abortions"?

Testiclaw wrote:I take that to mean that you don't have enough verifiable information regarding numbers of "back-alley abortions" in terms of absolute or as a percentage of population in order to successfully back up any ludicrous claim that outlawing abortion or severely restricting access to abortion via vicious legislation will increase said "back-alley abortions"?

As opposed to consigning poor women to Gosnell-like houses of horrors?

Wait, are you saying (again, without providing factual evidence in support of your theory) that limiting access to legal abortion operations will decrease the presence of illegal abortion operations?

Testiclaw wrote:Wait, are you saying (again, without providing factual evidence in support of your theory) that limiting access to legal abortion operations will decrease the presence of illegal abortion operations?

LOL at you. That is not the question anyone on this thread has asked.

Sorry we don't have the time, nor the crayons needed to explain things to you.

Testiclaw wrote:Sorry we don't have the time, nor the crayons needed to explain things to you.

That Democrats controlled Congress before 1973?

Dumdass.
Simpleton.

?

You should go home and slit your throat for us all.

Says the pussy who hides the fact he's online here.