IGX

Because some cultures are still stuck in the dark ages. No surprise that this is the schwoogies at it again.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... assed.html

Hmm, kind of a paradox for the Libs who love black folks, act like Africa is some cultural centre equal to our own and just love the Queers.

I love when blacks just shit on what the Libs hold dear. They kind of stand there and try to excuses them like they were at someon's home and their retard kid shit on the sofa. ( I love it for he irony, not what they are actually doing.)

While Obama is trying to send a bunch of gays to the Olympics to middle finger Putin and the Russians new laws about homosexuals don't hear the same concern coming from him for the black gays in Africa.

But we all know he prefers his peter puffers be white or Jawa.

" signed the Same Sex Marriage Prohibition Act into law on January 7"

I can't understand those fags. All right, they fuck each other, but why they want to marry? What profit in it for them?

It prohibits homosexuals from even meeting in groups of two or more, bans marriage or civil unions between people of the same sex, and criminalises gay clubs and events.

Again, i can't understand, why fags so much needs parades or something?
Why normal people don't marching on parades "I am normal!"

In short, i support Nigeria in this :)

Wild Bill wrote:" signed the Same Sex Marriage Prohibition Act into law on January 7"

I can't understand those fags. All right, they fuck each other, but why they want to marry? What profit in it for them?

For one thing, property rights. That's essentially what marriage is about, in the legal sense.
Also, they are people. And they want to have what other people have.
Maybe if Russia and Nigeria had more divorce attorneys you guys would get your shit together and stop hatin' on the gays.

Wild Bill wrote:

It prohibits homosexuals from even meeting in groups of two or more, bans marriage or civil unions between people of the same sex, and criminalises gay clubs and events.

Again, i can't understand, why fags so much needs parades or something?
Why normal people don't marching on parades "I am normal!"

In short, i support Nigeria in this :)

I got two words that scream gay like two guys getting banged by ten guys.

Bolshoi

Ballet

The Ginger Beard Man wrote:

Wild Bill wrote:" signed the Same Sex Marriage Prohibition Act into law on January 7"

I can't understand those fags. All right, they fuck each other, but why they want to marry? What profit in it for them?

For one thing, property rights. That's essentially what marriage is about, in the legal sense.
Also, they are people. And they want to have what other people have.
Maybe if Russia and Nigeria had more divorce attorneys you guys would get your shit together and stop hatin' on the gays.

1. Noone hates them. At least i don't, but why they want that everyone pay so much attention to them?
Let them fuck each other at home, why everyone should know that they are fags?

2. "For one thing, property rights" if they don't married there no any problems after divorce, right?

The Ginger Beard Man wrote:Also, they are people. And they want to have what other people have.

Other people have right to mary person of different sex.
They also have that right.

Queers have every right that straights do.

Every gay man has the right to marry a woman, just like every straight man does.

Every lesbian woman has the right to marry a man, just like every straight woman does.

Everyone already has equal rights.

The Ginger Beard Man wrote:

Wild Bill wrote:" signed the Same Sex Marriage Prohibition Act into law on January 7"

I can't understand those fags. All right, they fuck each other, but why they want to marry? What profit in it for them?

For one thing, property rights. That's essentially what marriage is about, in the legal sense.
Also, they are people. And they want to have what other people have.
Maybe if Russia and Nigeria had more divorce attorneys you guys would get your shit together and stop hatin' on the gays.

Double edged sword-- can't imagine how things better with that many more attorneys.

But seriously, in both countries, they see traditional marriage as an essential component to a good society.

Wild Bill wrote:

The Ginger Beard Man wrote:

Wild Bill wrote:" signed the Same Sex Marriage Prohibition Act into law on January 7"

I can't understand those fags. All right, they fuck each other, but why they want to marry? What profit in it for them?

For one thing, property rights. That's essentially what marriage is about, in the legal sense.
Also, they are people. And they want to have what other people have.
Maybe if Russia and Nigeria had more divorce attorneys you guys would get your shit together and stop hatin' on the gays.

1. Noone hates them. At least i don't, but why they want that everyone pay so much attention to them?
Let them fuck each other at home, why everyone should know that they are fags?

2. "For one thing, property rights" if they don't married there no any problems after divorce, right?

1. I was joking about the hate.
2. They are a theatrical bunch of people, they like attention.
3. Property rights is a legitimate issue.

I forgot where I saw this, make Taki's mag, but it's been pointed out that traditional marriage was destroyed long ago by straight people.

Wild Bill wrote:

The Ginger Beard Man wrote:

Wild Bill wrote:" signed the Same Sex Marriage Prohibition Act into law on January 7"

I can't understand those fags. All right, they fuck each other, but why they want to marry? What profit in it for them?

For one thing, property rights. That's essentially what marriage is about, in the legal sense.
Also, they are people. And they want to have what other people have.
Maybe if Russia and Nigeria had more divorce attorneys you guys would get your shit together and stop hatin' on the gays.

1. Noone hates them. At least i don't, but why they want that everyone pay so much attention to them?
Let them fuck each other at home, why everyone should know that they are fags?

2. "For one thing, property rights" if they don't married there no any problems after divorce, right?

I understand where you are coming from regarding some of the demonstrative elements of gay culture. However, most gay couples aren't at all what you see in the media and simply want to live their lives like you want them to.

Marriage is about legal rights more than anything else.

For instance:
- If a couple buys property together and lives in it for 30 years, they both should have rights if something happens.
- If one person is in the hospital, their partner should be able to visit.
- If a person wants to marry a person from another country, they should be able to do so.

From the news, you would believe that all gay people want to prance down the street wearing boas and dry humping each other but that isn't reality.

Gavin Mcinness said it in an article that I think was titled "gay marriage didn't kill marriage, divorce did". Or something like that.

Think that's it.

baffled wrote:Gavin Mcinness said it in an article that I think was titled "gay marriage didn't kill marriage, divorce did". Or something like that.

Think that's it.

http://takimag.com/article/gays_didnt_k ... z2qRK6spu8

Terry B. wrote:

Wild Bill wrote:

The Ginger Beard Man wrote:

Wild Bill wrote:" signed the Same Sex Marriage Prohibition Act into law on January 7"

I can't understand those fags. All right, they fuck each other, but why they want to marry? What profit in it for them?

For one thing, property rights. That's essentially what marriage is about, in the legal sense.
Also, they are people. And they want to have what other people have.
Maybe if Russia and Nigeria had more divorce attorneys you guys would get your shit together and stop hatin' on the gays.

1. Noone hates them. At least i don't, but why they want that everyone pay so much attention to them?
Let them fuck each other at home, why everyone should know that they are fags?

2. "For one thing, property rights" if they don't married there no any problems after divorce, right?

I understand where you are coming from regarding some of the demonstrative elements of gay culture. However, most gay couples aren't at all what you see in the media and simply want to live their lives like you want them to.

Marriage is about legal rights more than anything else.

For instance:
- If a couple buys property together and lives in it for 30 years, they both should have rights if something happens.
- If one person is in the hospital, their partner should be able to visit.
- If a person wants to marry a person from another country, they should be able to do so.

From the news, you would believe that all gay people want to prance down the street wearing boas and dry humping each other but that isn't reality.

Today Terry, good job man.

Terry B. wrote: For instance:
- If a couple buys property together and lives in it for 30 years, they both should have rights if something happens.
- If one person is in the hospital, their partner should be able to visit.
- If a person wants to marry a person from another country, they should be able to do so.

From the news, you would believe that all gay people want to prance down the street wearing boas and dry humping each other but that isn't reality.

Ok. It sounds reasonable. I agree.

But i still support Nigeria in this.
Marriages for fags its just beginning. Then they'll stat demand rights to adopt children and so on.
They are ill people. This illnes should be cured instead of indulgence to it.
Next will be pedophiles who will demand rights for them


In France man was arrested for wearing a shirt depicting a straight (heterosexual) family including a father, mother and children wich hold each other by hands, because it offends the rights of sexual minorities.

http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france ... r-tous.php?

are you aware that it was American Evangelicals who had moved to Africa that started that shitstorm? they realized they lost the culture war here, thanks to those gawddamn libs, so headed out to spread some bigotry. yay Murikkka.

D'Aquisto wrote:are you aware that it was American Evangelicals who had moved to Africa that started that shitstorm? they realized they lost the culture war here, thanks to those gawddamn libs, so headed out to spread some bigotry. yay Murikkka.

Gay marriage was legal there before the evangelicals showed up?

D'Aquisto wrote:are you aware that it was American Evangelicals who had moved to Africa that started that shitstorm? they realized they lost the culture war here, thanks to those gawddamn libs, so headed out to spread some bigotry. yay Murikkka.

Don't eat da' poopoo!
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euXQbZDwV0w[/youtube]

Turdacious wrote:

D'Aquisto wrote:are you aware that it was American Evangelicals who had moved to Africa that started that shitstorm? they realized they lost the culture war here, thanks to those gawddamn libs, so headed out to spread some bigotry. yay Murikkka.

Gay marriage was legal there before the evangelicals showed up?

He's far more correct than wrong.

Gay marriage along with homosexuality in general, as I understand it, was already illegal in most of sub-Saharan Africa though penalizing it by death is relatively new. Uganda's death penalty idea was brought in and supported by Western missionaries and the main supporters of the bill were western-trained preachers, etc.

http://www.sxpolitics.org/wp-content/up ... uespra.pdf

Terry B. wrote:

Turdacious wrote:

D'Aquisto wrote:are you aware that it was American Evangelicals who had moved to Africa that started that shitstorm? they realized they lost the culture war here, thanks to those gawddamn libs, so headed out to spread some bigotry. yay Murikkka.

Gay marriage was legal there before the evangelicals showed up?

He's far more correct than wrong.

Gay marriage along with homosexuality in general, as I understand it, was already illegal in most of sub-Saharan Africa though penalizing it by death is relatively new. Uganda's death penalty idea was brought in and supported by Western missionaries and the main supporters of the bill were western-trained preachers, etc.

http://www.sxpolitics.org/wp-content/up ... uespra.pdf

No he isn't-- and based on reading the executive summary and introduction, the study is a laughable piece of shit. It doesn't go into tribal beliefs (not easy, there are a lot of them), and doesn't seem to understand the basic fact that in the period studies none of the major missionary evangelical groups from the US have advocated killing gays and lesbians.

Whether or not the tribes killed known homosexuals when they were in charge, or what the effective policies were during colonial days, are both important factors. I don't think the author can understand those facts given his Marxist philosophical basis. Moreover, he tends to focus on evangelicals, without including the influence of Anglicans, Orthodox, and Catholics (none of which have advocated killing homosexuals in recent times).

He's making the same assumptions that he accuses evangelical missionaries of making-- assuming that African values and traditions are unimportant relative to 'enlightened' western ones. Not surprising considering the neo-Marxist philosophical underpinnings.

Nobody would argue that homophobic beliefs or practices were not present. However, the strengthening of related laws can be directly traced to western Christian influence. For instance, proponents of the Ugandan death law have been quite open that they came up with the idea after attending a sermon/retreat held by western missionaries.

It's like saying that Kaz contributes to some of the racist rants and ravings by the likes of Batboy and DARTH. Certainly, no one could argue that that either were not already deviants who harbored such beliefs but it would be equally incorrect to say that the degree of their nigger talk can not be directly attributed to his guiding example.

I'm sure that there are many fine missionaries doing good work around the world that really makes a difference in people's lives. However, from having some contact with such folks, the ones who go into places like Africa or China tend to be the true believers, intent on pushing fairly radical agendas.

Terry B. wrote:
It's like saying that Kaz contributes to some of the racist rants and ravings by the likes of Batboy and DARTH. Certainly, no one could argue that that either were not already deviants who harbored such beliefs but it would be equally incorrect to say that the degree of their nigger talk can not be directly attributed to his guiding example.

I

Man, you are relatively new here or what?

Terry B. wrote:Nobody would argue that homophobic beliefs or practices were not present. However, the strengthening of related laws can be directly traced to western Christian influence. For instance, proponents of the Ugandan death law have been quite open that they came up with the idea after attending a sermon/retreat held by western missionaries.

It's like saying that Kaz contributes to some of the racist rants and ravings by the likes of Batboy and DARTH. Certainly, no one could argue that that either were not already deviants who harbored such beliefs but it would be equally incorrect to say that the degree of their nigger talk can not be directly attributed to his guiding example.

I'm sure that there are many fine missionaries doing good work around the world that really makes a difference in people's lives. However, from having some contact with such folks, the ones who go into places like Africa or China tend to be the true believers, intent on pushing fairly radical agendas.

You're making a lot of generalizations based on a very limited knowledge of African Christianity, limited knowledge of recent African history, and no respect for the various African cultures. And no respect for the Muslim influence.

But whatever makes you feel superior to the rest of us mere mortals.