IGX

syaigh wrote:Here's the thing that kills me. These weren't runaways. They mostly lived with their parents. If I saw a friends kid at McDonalds with an older man, I'd probably call her. Wtf? Small town? No one noticed this shit? Of course the Paki's are to blame. But seriously. Wtf?

They'll need a larger elephant budget there, this is clearly.

seeahill wrote:There used to be a thing in the UK called "Paki bashing." A whole lot of English guys would beat the shit out of a Pakistani guy for no good reason. Well now they have a good reason. (Select the Paki pederasts please.)

There was plenty of that when I was a kid.

Geert Wilders is correct...you keep importing 3rd world shit, and eventually your country becomes a 3rd world toilet.

"Do we have any foreigners in the audience tonight? If so, please put up your hands. Wogs I mean, I'm looking at you. Where are you? I'm sorry but some fucking wog...Arab grabbed my wife's bum, you know? Surely got to be said, yeah this is what all the fucking foreigners and wogs over here are like, just disgusting, that's just the truth, yeah. So where are you? Well wherever you all are, I think you should all just leave. Not just leave the hall, leave our country. You fucking (indecipherable). I don't want you here, in the room or in my country. Listen to me, man! I think we should vote for Enoch Powell. Enoch's our man. I think Enoch's right, I think we should send them all back. Stop Britain from becoming a black colony. Get the foreigners out. Get the wogs out. Get the coons out. Keep Britain white. I used to be into dope, now I'm into racism. It's much heavier, man. Fucking wogs, man. Fucking Saudis taking over London. Bastard wogs. Britain is becoming overcrowded and Enoch will stop it and send them all back. The black wogs and coons and Arabs and fucking Jamaicans and fucking (indecipherable) don't belong here, we don't want them here. This is England, this is a white country, we don't want any black wogs and coons living here. We need to make clear to them they are not welcome. England is for white people, man. We are a white country. I don't want fucking wogs living next to me with their standards. This is Great Britain, a white country, what is happening to us, for fuck's sake? We need to vote for Enoch Powell, he's a great man, speaking truth. Vote for Enoch, he's our man, he's on our side, he'll look after us. I want all of you here to vote for Enoch, support him, he's on our side. Enoch for Prime Minister! Throw the wogs out! Keep Britain white!" - Old Slow Hand himself.

DrDonkeyLove wrote:As usual, I don't understand Spells' point. If it's that we don't know 100% exactly who and how many are involved, the elephants can get started now and keep at it until the whole lot are but crimson spots on England's verdant fields.

The point is simply that savages raped and enslaved with the tacit approval of the supposedly civilized. Jumbo stomp the lot of them.

Suppose you had some NAMBLA assholes who happened to be mostly minorities abusing kids in Ohio. Years later, it's revealed police knew and weren't doing anything. Unnamed people said they didn't want to be accused of being racists. That story would not pass the smell test. It would look like there was something else going on, and while you'd certainly punish the victimizers, a smart reporter and justice system would take a very hard look at the people in power who did nothing while giving a reason that makes no sense.

Had heard about this for years and finally found it for free online and read it in June.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Camp_of_the_Saints

Interesting, especially w/ the tens of thousands immigrants coming up from Central America or Europe.

"The Camp of the Saints is a novel about population migration and its consequences. In Calcutta, India, the Belgian government announces a policy in which Indian babies will be adopted and raised in Belgium. The policy is soon reversed after the Belgian consulate is inundated with poverty-stricken parents eager to give up their infant children.

An Indian "wise man" then rallies the masses to make a mass exodus to live in Europe. Most of the story centers on the French Riviera, where almost no one remains except for the military and a few civilians, including a retired professor who has been watching the huge fleet of run down freighters approaching the French coast.

The story alternates between the French reaction to the mass immigration and the attitude of the immigrants. They have no desire to assimilate into French culture but want the plentiful goods that are in short supply in their native India. Although the novel focuses on France, the rest of the West shares its fate.

Near the end of the story the mayor of New York City is made to share Gracie Mansion with three families from Harlem, the Queen of England must agree to have her son marry a Pakistani woman, and only one drunken Soviet soldier stands in the way of thousands of Chinese people as they swarm into Siberia. The one holdout until the end of the novel is Switzerland, but by then international pressure isolating it as a rogue state for not opening its borders forces it to capitulate."

Grandpa's Spells wrote:

DrDonkeyLove wrote:As usual, I don't understand Spells' point. If it's that we don't know 100% exactly who and how many are involved, the elephants can get started now and keep at it until the whole lot are but crimson spots on England's verdant fields.

The point is simply that savages raped and enslaved with the tacit approval of the supposedly civilized. Jumbo stomp the lot of them.

Suppose you had some NAMBLA assholes who happened to be mostly minorities abusing kids in Ohio. Years later, it's revealed police knew and weren't doing anything. Unnamed people said they didn't want to be accused of being racists. That story would not pass the smell test. It would look like there was something else going on, and while you'd certainly punish the victimizers, a smart reporter and justice system would take a very hard look at the people in power who did nothing while giving a reason that makes no sense.

AND THE HONOURABLE JUDGE SPELLS RULES...

ROTHERHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT-- NOT GUILTY DESPITE 1400 VICTIMS IGNORED OVER A PERIOD OF YEARS
FERGUSON POLICE DEPARTMENT-- GUILTY AFTER ONE SHOOTING ON ONE DAY

Turdacious wrote:

Grandpa's Spells wrote:

DrDonkeyLove wrote:As usual, I don't understand Spells' point. If it's that we don't know 100% exactly who and how many are involved, the elephants can get started now and keep at it until the whole lot are but crimson spots on England's verdant fields.

The point is simply that savages raped and enslaved with the tacit approval of the supposedly civilized. Jumbo stomp the lot of them.

Suppose you had some NAMBLA assholes who happened to be mostly minorities abusing kids in Ohio. Years later, it's revealed police knew and weren't doing anything. Unnamed people said they didn't want to be accused of being racists. That story would not pass the smell test. It would look like there was something else going on, and while you'd certainly punish the victimizers, a smart reporter and justice system would take a very hard look at the people in power who did nothing while giving a reason that makes no sense.

AND THE HONOURABLE JUDGE SPELLS RULES...

ROTHERHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT-- NOT GUILTY DESPITE 1400 VICTIMS IGNORED OVER A PERIOD OF YEARS
FERGUSON POLICE DEPARTMENT-- GUILTY AFTER ONE SHOOTING ON ONE DAY

Are you drinking? I'm saying it looks like the police were either abetting or were actively involved.

As far as I can tell, the only disagreement between Spells and anyone else here is about why the cops and other officials made themselves accessories to child rape.

But it's fun to see his views spun in other directions.

Pinky wrote:As far as I can tell, the only disagreement between Spells and anyone else here is about why the cops and other officials made themselves accessories to child rape.

But it's fun to see his views spun in other directions.

Of course, Spells is simply white knighting for political correctness. PC could never be the cause of something bad, after all.

Herv100 wrote:

Pinky wrote:As far as I can tell, the only disagreement between Spells and anyone else here is about why the cops and other officials made themselves accessories to child rape.

But it's fun to see his views spun in other directions.

Of course, Spells is simply white knighting for political correctness. PC could never be the cause of something bad, after all.

Complaints about Political Correctness seem to have gradually morphed into "Why can't I just be a racist, sexist, homophobic asshole in peace?"

There may be some of that, but it pales in comparison to the way in which the politically correct have squeezed the air out of all discussion that doesn't conform to their narrow values. Much like an elephant, pressing the air out of a pair of Pakistani lungs.

Fat Cat wrote:There may be some of that, but it pales in comparison to the way in which the politically correct have squeezed the air out of all discussion that doesn't conform to their narrow values.

What can't people talk about? Modern politics is so polarized, people rail on both sides of every subject I can think of.

Let's just use this thread as an example. A bunch of Paki scum raped a bunch of white children, this much we can agree on. Then, rather than properly investigate it, they put some dude with the fine North-country name "Nazir Afzal" in charge of the investigation, putting the fox in charge of the hen house as it were. Remember what you said about "take a very hard look at the people in power"? Think of it as a vertically-integrated Saracen rape apparatus.

Any right thinking man can detect the pattern here, but you deflect, saying it is the cops fault and that surely (presumably white) sexism, corruption, and the desire of us all to be racist, sexist, homophobic boors are the real dynamics behind this situation. In other words, rather than joining me in my righteous call for Elephant Justice, you prefer to silence your detractors--and any whiff of racial consciousness--using the standard lexicon of PC epithets while stubbornly refusing to acknowledge that the "hard look" you suggest we take reveals a line of wog rapists, wog kidnappers, wog investigators, etc.

Meanwhile...

Grandpa's Spells wrote:

Fat Cat wrote:There may be some of that, but it pales in comparison to the way in which the politically correct have squeezed the air out of all discussion that doesn't conform to their narrow values.

What can't people talk about? Modern politics is so polarized, people rail on both sides of every subject I can think of.

This whole Rotherham thing is the fault of teh Tea Party apparently.

Fat Cat wrote:Let's just use this thread as an example.

Of course. Here, where un-PC speech is so stifled.

In other words, rather than joining me in my righteous call for Elephant Justice, you prefer to silence your detractors--and any whiff of racial consciousness--using the standard lexicon of PC epithets while stubbornly refusing to acknowledge that the "hard look" you suggest we take reveals a line of wog rapists, wog kidnappers, wog investigators, etc.

LOL at people being silenced. Apologies to all who feel uncomfortable expressing themselves. My sole point was: This isn't just a gang of powerless people nobody likes, powerful people are complicit. If it's Nazir Afzal (first I've heard that name), great. If it's British Arab Jesse Jackson, fine. I'm not saying there have to be some white people behind the whole thing, only that it is not solely the people described in the article, who are among the last people in Britain you'd expect cops to risk their careers for.

Nobody is claiming the Pakistanis are being scapegoated, though that's partly because it might excite Gene.

read what nazir himself has to say:

http://www.newstatesman.com/staggers/20 ... -ethnicity

Grandpa's Spells wrote:

Fat Cat wrote:Let's just use this thread as an example.

Of course. Here, where un-PC speech is so stifled.

Your attempt is no less notable than your failure.

Grandpa's Spells wrote:LOL at people being silenced. Apologies to all who feel uncomfortable expressing themselves.

Thank you, I accept your apology.

Grandpa's Spells wrote:My sole point was: This isn't just a gang of powerless people nobody likes, powerful people are complicit. If it's Nazir Afzal (first I've heard that name), great. If it's British Arab Jesse Jackson, fine. I'm not saying there have to be some white people behind the whole thing, only that it is not solely the people described in the article, who are among the last people in Britain you'd expect cops to risk their careers for.

And my sole point is that they all need a size seven hundred elephant boot to the dome piece. Recognize.

Y'all know that my original post was from the Onion, right?

buckethead wrote:Y'all know that my original post was from the Onion, right?

That explains why the reporting seemed too good to come from the NYT.

Surprised nothing has happened at a 'people' level... Oi!



...We had a riot when it became apparent that Lebanese males were applying their 'traditional' attitudes to local Aussie girls.

Not many skins left now, the national front and c18 seem to have died a death.

The lads who would used to go out doing this sort of thing are busy doing business with the Pakistanis - they run the smack trade in the north of England.

But you do still get the odd roving group, but it's never reported