Consistently missed

Topics without replies are pruned every 365 days. Not moderated.

Moderator: Dux

User avatar

Topic author
Sangoma
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7132
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:16 pm
Contact:

Consistently missed

Post by Sangoma »

A nurse at work remarked that on Saturday "Putin was flexing muscles again", referring to the Army parade at the Red Square. Out of fun I asked him if he knows what happened on the 9th of May. "In Russia? - I don't know!" I pressed: "In the World history?" - The same reply and sheepish puzzlement (what does he want from me). Over the years of living overseas I am used to the idea that - depending to whom you talk - in the West people generally believe the World War Two was won either by Americans or British. Yet very few know what this date means. And it is never forgotten in Russia.

This year it's the 70th Anniversary, probably the last round number when when some veterans are still alive. Very close to every Russian, as pretty much every family had someone either fight or die at the time.
Image

User avatar

Shafpocalypse Now
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21281
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:26 pm

Re: Consistently missed

Post by Shafpocalypse Now »

Between Stalin's purges and the wanton waste of soldiery, it's a wonder there are any real ethic Russians left

User avatar

Bud Charniga's grape ape
Top
Posts: 1093
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 5:30 pm

Re: Consistently missed

Post by Bud Charniga's grape ape »

I dunno man. Maybe it's because I lived in DC for ten years, but VE Day was always a pretty big deal. If nothing else it was the day when you'd get to see a flyover by some sweet-ass vintage P-51s.

User avatar

Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21247
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

Re: Consistently missed

Post by Turdacious »

Smet wrote:This year it's the 70th Anniversary, probably the last round number when when some veterans are still alive. Very close to every Russian, as pretty much every family had someone either fight or die at the time.
Maybe it's different over there, but over here guys who 'know' that war is hell generally don't talk about it with those who don't. Not sure if this applies to Russians, but the pervasive sentiment from the WWII vets that 'we had it easy compared to the WWI guys' is humbling to say the least.
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule


Protobuilder
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 5038
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:51 am

Re: Consistently missed

Post by Protobuilder »

Smet wrote:Over the years of living overseas I am used to the idea that - depending to whom you talk - in the West people generally believe the World War Two was won either by Americans or British.
People in China are the only people who understand that they were the people who really won the war.

If you are ever in country, simply ask.
WildGorillaMan wrote:Enthusiasm combined with no skill whatsoever can sometimes carry the day.

User avatar

Beer Jew
Sgt. Major
Posts: 3299
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:35 pm

Re: Consistently missed

Post by Beer Jew »

Turdacious wrote:
Smet wrote:This year it's the 70th Anniversary, probably the last round number when when some veterans are still alive. Very close to every Russian, as pretty much every family had someone either fight or die at the time.
Maybe it's different over there, but over here guys who 'know' that war is hell generally don't talk about it with those who don't. Not sure if this applies to Russians, but the pervasive sentiment from the WWII vets that 'we had it easy compared to the WWI guys' is humbling to say the least.
There is nothing soldiers like talking about more than the fact that they are/were soldiers. It's very very rare to find one who doesn't.

User avatar

terra
Top
Posts: 1318
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 8:54 pm

Re: Consistently missed

Post by terra »

Beer Jew wrote:There is nothing soldiers like talking about more than the fact that they are/were soldiers. It's very very rare to find one who doesn't.
It's probably different everywhere. But as a child of Vietnam era Dads, I don't fully agree. When I was young I saw them drink on ANZAC DAY and they'd talk a bit. Otherwise, it remained a bit of a shadow across their face when the topic came up. Two of Dad's mates committed suicide on returning from Vietnam (the whole set-up was different for the Aussies).
What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.
Ralph Waldo Emerson

User avatar

Bob Wildes
Top
Posts: 1831
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:22 pm
Location: Heart Of Darkness

Re: Consistently missed

Post by Bob Wildes »

terra wrote:
Beer Jew wrote:There is nothing soldiers like talking about more than the fact that they are/were soldiers. It's very very rare to find one who doesn't.
It's probably different everywhere. But as a child of Vietnam era Dads, I don't fully agree. When I was young I saw them drink on ANZAC DAY and they'd talk a bit. Otherwise, it remained a bit of a shadow across their face when the topic came up. Two of Dad's mates committed suicide on returning from Vietnam (the whole set-up was different for the Aussies).
I met an Aussie during August or September 1972 at Bien Hoa. I do not recall his reason for being there as there were zero Aussie troops on that base, but
there were Aussie troops somewhere in country at that time.

During the conversation the Aussie mentioned that Playboy magazine was not allowed in Australia. I asked him why and he stated that it wasn't the photography. It
was the political content of the magazine.

Beer Jew I knew several vets that did not care to discuss their service with the general public.
"Tell A.P. Hill he must come up."

User avatar

WildGorillaMan
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 9951
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:01 pm

Re: Consistently missed

Post by WildGorillaMan »

A family friend had been 14 and in the Hitlerjugend at war's end. Once over the dinner table, after many drinks he shared a story. As the war was grinding to a close the general staff was issuing rifles to every kid with a pulse and throwing them at the allies.

Fortunately for him and all the other kids in their unit their sergeant was a pragmatic veteran of the trenches of WWI, and saw the writing on the wall. "Alright kids," he told them, "we're going to practice woodland survival." He took them into the woods and got them lost for three months, camping and hiking until he found an American unit to surrender to.

Conversely, the grandfather of a girl I dated in college was captured at Stalingrad and spent seven years in a Soviet POW camp before he was repatriated. He never spoke to anyone about what happened during that time.
Last edited by WildGorillaMan on Mon May 11, 2015 8:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
You'll Hurt Your Back

basically I'm Raoul Duke trying to fit into a Philip K. Dick movie remake.


Protobuilder
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 5038
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:51 am

Re: Consistently missed

Post by Protobuilder »

Beer Jew wrote:
Turdacious wrote:
Smet wrote:This year it's the 70th Anniversary, probably the last round number when when some veterans are still alive. Very close to every Russian, as pretty much every family had someone either fight or die at the time.
Maybe it's different over there, but over here guys who 'know' that war is hell generally don't talk about it with those who don't. Not sure if this applies to Russians, but the pervasive sentiment from the WWII vets that 'we had it easy compared to the WWI guys' is humbling to say the least.
There is nothing soldiers like talking about more than the fact that they are/were soldiers. It's very very rare to find one who doesn't.
I'm guessing that most of these folks are under 40?
WildGorillaMan wrote:Enthusiasm combined with no skill whatsoever can sometimes carry the day.

User avatar

Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21247
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

Re: Consistently missed

Post by Turdacious »

Beer Jew wrote:
Turdacious wrote:
Smet wrote:This year it's the 70th Anniversary, probably the last round number when when some veterans are still alive. Very close to every Russian, as pretty much every family had someone either fight or die at the time.
Maybe it's different over there, but over here guys who 'know' that war is hell generally don't talk about it with those who don't. Not sure if this applies to Russians, but the pervasive sentiment from the WWII vets that 'we had it easy compared to the WWI guys' is humbling to say the least.
There is nothing soldiers like talking about more than the fact that they are/were soldiers. It's very very rare to find one who doesn't.
There's a difference between saying that you served, and discussing what you saw and what you did.

Even a cursory look at the Soviet casualty rates:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_ ... lties#USSR
makes it clear that their WWII experience was very different than the American one. I don't claim to understand their perspective.
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule


TerryB
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 9697
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:17 pm

Re: Consistently missed

Post by TerryB »

Turdacious wrote:Even a cursory look at the Soviet casualty rates:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_ ... lties#USSR
makes it clear that their WWII experience was very different than the American one. I don't claim to understand their perspective.
That's because you come from a country with a successful military (in the 20th century, anyway).
"Know that! & Know it deep you fucking loser!"

Image

User avatar

Beer Jew
Sgt. Major
Posts: 3299
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:35 pm

Re: Consistently missed

Post by Beer Jew »

Yeah I'm talking about people who are soldiers now, rather than those who served during an actual war.

User avatar

Topic author
Sangoma
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7132
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Consistently missed

Post by Sangoma »

To think of it, few veterans discussed the details of the War. I remember a few coming to my school and telling about their experiences. In retrospect they seem a bit phoney.

Most were not keen to talk though. As were civilians at the time. A friend of mine tried to talk up her grandmother, the survival of Leningrad blockade, about life during that time. She tried it for years, with no success. Lots of these guys were grim and drank like fish. Fucking horrible times.
Image

User avatar

Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21247
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

Re: Consistently missed

Post by Turdacious »

Beer Jew wrote:Yeah I'm talking about people who are soldiers now, rather than those who served during an actual war.
Interesting. Most of the British Soldiers I've talked to have been impressive; many have seen quite a bit (most served relatively recently). I've got nothing but the highest respect for them and the tradition they're part of.
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule

User avatar

Bobby
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 7:41 pm

Re: Consistently missed

Post by Bobby »

I`ve noticed that those on my fathers side who took part in real (horrible) actions/fighting in Burma etc never talked,but those that did not (cook in the RAF for example) always wanted to talk about the war.
You`ll toughen up.Unless you have a serious medical condition commonly refered to as
"being a pussy".

User avatar

Cave Canem
Top
Posts: 1377
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:24 pm
Location: Somebody's dog house somewhere.

Re: Consistently missed

Post by Cave Canem »

When my wife's father passed away, her mother started dating a guy named Bernie. I knew Bernie for years but didn't find out until a few months before he passed away that he had a CIB and was severely wounded three days after invading Normandy. The subject never came up until he was visiting my house and saw the flag from my own father's funeral and a picture of me in uniform that my wife decided to put on display for Memorial day. First and only time we ever discussed our service.
Tantum validus superstes

User avatar

Gary John
Gunny
Posts: 892
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:23 pm

Re: Consistently missed

Post by Gary John »

Had a lot to say, wrote it out beautifully, then deleted it. The audience in America who have seen actual combat is miniscule
Image


RottenFace
Gunny
Posts: 804
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:01 am

Re: Consistently missed

Post by RottenFace »

Its been my general experience that those the speak the most have the most limited experience with combat, and this is true across generations. The real BTDTs don't need the affirmation from folks who went "there" wherever that there may be.

Both my grandfathers flew in WWII. Both were awarded DFCs, one a Silver Star. One was a squadron CO at 23. Neither ever spoke about it, and would not speak about. My uncle was a Marine in Vietnam. He will not engage me at all about his time there.

There are always exceptions (i.e., the entire Naval Special Warfare Community and the angry PTSD crew, pick your service and conflict) but most legit folks will only open up with others who have seen the same things. IMO.

User avatar

Schlegel
Top
Posts: 2161
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 11:21 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Consistently missed

Post by Schlegel »

Smet, I don't think it has anything to with thinking who won the war. Think about how the war for the US was split between the Pacific and Europe, and how close VE day is to Memorial Day, which grew from remembrance customs that predate WWII by 70 years. It's inevitable that VE day would have less importance in the US than in former Soviet states.
"Why do we need a kitchen when we have a phone?"

User avatar

Topic author
Sangoma
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7132
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Consistently missed

Post by Sangoma »

Makes sense. I didn't know about the Memorial Day. Though it is hardly an excuse for Australians, South Africans and Brits. Though understandable, because continental European countries were much more involved in WW2.
Image

User avatar

Bud Charniga's grape ape
Top
Posts: 1093
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 5:30 pm

Re: Consistently missed

Post by Bud Charniga's grape ape »

Smet wrote:Though understandable, because continental European countries were much more involved in WW2.
Restrict that to "the European theater" and you're at least half right. The ANZACs saw a lot of combat in the Pacific (air sea and land) and did the bulk of the ground fighting in the South West Pacific. They also saw quite a bit of combat in Europe prior to the opening of the Pacific theater.

Though it's understandable that Russians wouldn't know that, since before Hitler invaded you were busy being his bff and molesting the Poles and the Finns, and you didn't do shit in the Pacific until the war was almost over. Za rodinu! \:D/


DPR
Top
Posts: 1344
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:08 am

Re: Consistently missed

Post by DPR »

Maybe the Soviets wouldn't have suffered so many casualties in WWII if Stalin hadn't purged the Red Army in the late 1930s?

User avatar

Topic author
Sangoma
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7132
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Consistently missed

Post by Sangoma »

Pacific War and the participation of ANZAC was significantly lesser event compared to the scale of events in Europe, both in terms of numbers and significance. I am not saying ANZAC deaths are less tragic and don't want to take away from what they did, just keeping things in perspective.

In regards to USSR (not me, I wasn't born at the time) being allies with Hitler - I am the first to say that most participants of that war (like any war) were worth each other. That includes Britain and France who cut off the Sudettenland from Czechoslovakia and gave it to Hitler. Britain later refused to comply with the co-operation pact with Czechs when Hitler attacked them, on the grounds that the pact was made with Czechoslovakia, not Czech Republic, and by the time Hitler attacked Slovakia was already separated and therefore there was no country with which the pact was made in the first place.

There is more. There is a convincing and circumstantially supported by facts theory that USSR was planning to invade Europe, and Hitler attacked few weeks in advance in the desperate attempt to avoid defeat. Suvorov's book Ice Breaker lays it out in detail. Purges surely played a role in the number of casualties, though most significant of them happened in the 1920-s, not 1930-s, when White officers from centuries long lines were wiped out by the Reds.
Last edited by Sangoma on Wed May 13, 2015 5:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image


TerryB
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 9697
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:17 pm

Re: Consistently missed

Post by TerryB »

Smet wrote: Purges surely played a role in the number of casualties, though most significant of them happened in the 1920-s, not 1930-s, when White officers from centuries long lines were wiped out by the Reds.
Are you a communist pig, Smet?

If so, how do you feel about some young Russians romanticizing the USSR. I saw Koklyaev sporting a USSR weight belt on Facebook the other day. Do young Russians want more purges, Pravda, and centralized control of their lives?
"Know that! & Know it deep you fucking loser!"

Image

Post Reply