IGX

Blaidd Drwg wrote:Apparently you are as stupid as you seem. I've made my arguments on a wide range of sources including something closeted cowards like you will always lack, first person experience.

In the end I agree most closely with Sagoma, although I don't think the US is ready for as much legalization as we might hope. I've been crystal clear on my stance and approach which you've not read nor understood.

You can keep making excuses, obfuscating, bullshitting yourself and others. At the end of the day, your arguments reflect a feeble cowardly and timid approach to conservatism. No one buys it now. I'd be surprised if anyone ever did.

Turdacious wrote:

Blaidd Drwg wrote:Apparently you are as stupid as you seem. I've made my arguments on a wide range of sources including something closeted cowards like you will always lack, first person experience.

In the end I agree most closely with Sagoma, although I don't think the US is ready for as much legalization as we might hope. I've been crystal clear on my stance and approach which you've not read nor understood.

You can keep making excuses, obfuscating, bullshitting yourself and others. At the end of the day, your arguments reflect a feeble cowardly and timid approach to conservatism. No one buys it now. I'd be surprised if anyone ever did.

Because I focus on the original discussion rather than the one you want to have? I'm not willing to state that your consequences are the norm without evidence. Making policy on tacit knowledge is always foolish.

Vancouver, B.C., has had a “supervised injection facility” for over a decade. Called InSite, it consists of little stalls where people can prepare and inject their drug of choice, with medical staff standing by in case of overdose and to connect people with treatment services if they want them.

After years of evaluation, the verdict is in: InSite works. A 2011 study in The Lancet found that InSite’s creation correlated with a large drop in drug deaths in the surrounding neighborhood. And while it’s seen more than a thousand overdoses, according to InSite’s website, there has never been a single fatality.

According to a 2009 report summarizing various scientific evaluations, InSite also reduced public injecting, lowered syringe sharing, and increased participation in addiction treatment—all without any discernible negative side effects. It even seems to save taxpayers money.

Blaidd Drwg wrote:Good. Riddance.

You wanna OD? I'll scrounge something up for you, gladly.

Narconomics: How to Run a Drug Cartel Kindle Edition
by Tom Wainwright (Author)

How does a budding cartel boss succeed (and survive) in the $300 billion illegal drug business? By learning from the best, of course. From creating brand value to fine-tuning customer service, the folks running cartels have been attentive students of the strategy and tactics used by corporations such as Walmart, McDonald’s, and Coca-Cola.
And what can government learn to combat this scourge? By analyzing the cartels as companies, law enforcers might better understand how they work—and stop throwing away $100 billion a year in a futile effort to win the “war” against this global, highly organized business.
Your intrepid guide to the most exotic and brutal industry on earth is Tom Wainwright. Picking his way through Andean cocaine fields, Central American prisons, Colorado pot shops, and the online drug dens of the Dark Web, Wainwright provides a fresh, innovative look into the drug trade and its 250 million customers.

Yes, I'm drunk wrote: