so black is white.Turdacious wrote:Not sure there's much of a difference when you factor for family income.dead man walking wrote:typical of chalk-colored whingers to have a thread about phony claims, when we kow racism is the problem:The Ginger Beard Man wrote:http://www.timesunion.com/local/article ... 314745.php
Phony claims of racism are nothing new.
Women and people of color earn a lower income for the same work. People of color pay more for homes and cars. Employers are less likely to offer job interviews to people with “black-sounding” names. Teachers are less likely to recommend black and Latino students for gifted education and more likely to recommend them for special education, than white students with identical test scores. Doctors are less likely to offer pain management and necessary testing for people of color. Environmental hazards are greater in communities of color. Poor women don’t have equal or adequate access to reproductive health care.
"Hate" Crimes?
Topics without replies are pruned every 365 days. Not moderated.
Moderator: Dux
-
dead man walking
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm
Re: "Hate" Crimes?
Post by dead man walking »
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.
dead man walking
-
bennyonesix
- Sgt. Major
- Posts: 2710
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 3:25 am
Re: "Hate" Crimes?
Post by bennyonesix »
- Cyhl9GxW8AAK0lN.jpg (23.7 KiB) Viewed 8061 times
bennyonesix
-
Turdacious
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21247
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
- Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan
Re: "Hate" Crimes?
Post by Turdacious »
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule
Turdacious
-
bennyonesix
- Sgt. Major
- Posts: 2710
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 3:25 am
bennyonesix
-
DrDonkeyLove
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 8034
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 4:04 am
- Location: Deep in a well
Re: "Hate" Crimes?
Post by DrDonkeyLove »
Sssshhhh, you're fucking up the approved narrative.
Mao wrote:Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. Our principle is that the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party
DrDonkeyLove
Re: "Hate" Crimes?
Asking someone to pass you the crackers is not racist....racist slurs and other derogatory language leveled against white students
Don’t believe everything you think.
nafod
-
Turdacious
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21247
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
- Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan
Re: "Hate" Crimes?
Post by Turdacious »
nafod wrote:Asking someone to pass you the crackers is not racist....racist slurs and other derogatory language leveled against white students
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule
Turdacious
-
bennyonesix
- Sgt. Major
- Posts: 2710
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 3:25 am
Re: "Hate" Crimes?
Post by bennyonesix »
Typical that you two fail to address the content of the article and how it sheds light on Hate Crimes and groups like the SPLC's role.
Instead we get facebook tier banter.
Instead we get facebook tier banter.
bennyonesix
-
Turdacious
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21247
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
- Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan
Re: "Hate" Crimes?
Post by Turdacious »
It's still real to Benny dammit!
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule
Turdacious
-
Grandpa's Spells
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 11367
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm
Re: "Hate" Crimes?
Post by Grandpa's Spells »
One of the downsides of the Internet is that it allows like-minded people to form communities, and sometimes those communities are stupid.
Grandpa's Spells
Re: "Hate" Crimes?
Holeeeeee sheeeeeet, I guess there wasn't any racism at all until what 1950? That jump from .75 to 1.5% is CRAAAAZY!
Boris
-
bennyonesix
- Sgt. Major
- Posts: 2710
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 3:25 am
Re: "Hate" Crimes?
Post by bennyonesix »
That's not the takeaway Boris.
This is a thread about the alleged increased incidence of white hate crimes.
That is evidence of a manufactured outbreak.
This is a thread about the alleged increased incidence of white hate crimes.
That is evidence of a manufactured outbreak.
bennyonesix
-
DrDonkeyLove
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 8034
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 4:04 am
- Location: Deep in a well
Re: "Hate" Crimes?
Post by DrDonkeyLove »
Who loves THE Black Man? Donald J. Trump that's who!
New Chairman for the National Endowment for the Arts? One can only hope.
New Chairman for the National Endowment for the Arts? One can only hope.
Mao wrote:Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. Our principle is that the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party
DrDonkeyLove
Boris
-
The Ginger Beard Man
- Sgt. Major
- Posts: 4376
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:27 pm
- Location: 4th largest city in America
Re: "Hate" Crimes?
Post by The Ginger Beard Man »
Blaidd Drwg wrote:Disengage from the outcome and do work.
Jezzy Bell wrote:Use a fucking barbell, pansy.
The Ginger Beard Man
-
DrDonkeyLove
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 8034
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 4:04 am
- Location: Deep in a well
Re: "Hate" Crimes?
Post by DrDonkeyLove »
America is not lacking idiots.
Mao wrote:Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. Our principle is that the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party
DrDonkeyLove
-
powerlifter54
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 7976
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 5:46 pm
- Location: TX
Re: "Hate" Crimes?
Post by powerlifter54 »
anything that keeps him from releasing another CD...DrDonkeyLove wrote:Who loves THE Black Man? Donald J. Trump that's who!
New Chairman for the National Endowment for the Arts? One can only hope.
"Start slowly, then ease off". Tortuga Golden Striders Running Club, Pensacola 1984.
"But even snake wrestling beats life in the cube, for me at least. In measured doses."-Lex
"But even snake wrestling beats life in the cube, for me at least. In measured doses."-Lex
powerlifter54
Re: "Hate" Crimes?
They both know about gold-diggersDrDonkeyLove wrote:Who loves THE Black Man? Donald J. Trump that's who!
New Chairman for the National Endowment for the Arts? One can only hope.
Don’t believe everything you think.
nafod
Re: "Hate" Crimes?
"You ever just grab'em by the pussy?"DrDonkeyLove wrote:Who loves THE Black Man? Donald J. Trump that's who!
New Chairman for the National Endowment for the Arts? One can only hope.
"Oh hell yea, I grab'em by the pussy all the time."
"I love grabbing'em by the pussy."
"Me too. See a pussy - grab it."
"If you had a pussy, I'd be grabbing it."
"If I had one, it'd be wet..."
Don’t believe everything you think.
nafod
-
dead man walking
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm
Re: "Hate" Crimes?
Post by dead man walking »
even the legal system commits hate crimes, legally.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/17/opini ... egion&_r=0Decades of research have shown that the criminal courts sentence black defendants more harshly than whites. But a striking new investigation of sentencing disparities in Florida by The Sarasota Herald-Tribune expands our understanding of this problem in two important ways.
It exposes the fact that African-American defendants get more time behind bars — sometimes twice the prison terms of whites with identical criminal histories — when they commit the same crimes under identical circumstances. It also shows how bias on the part of individual judges and prosecutors drives sentencing inequity.
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.
dead man walking
-
bennyonesix
- Sgt. Major
- Posts: 2710
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 3:25 am
Re: "Hate" Crimes?
Post by bennyonesix »
Holy shit that is disingenuous. The vast majority of criminal defendants (prob +95%) are sentenced via a guilty plea and plea agreement indicating sentence. Judges rarely deviate from the agreement. Moreover, many guilty pleas do not reflect the underlying facts. So, in essence, these pleas and sentences are the result of negotiations btwn prosecutors and defense attys (mostly pd's). It really is one of the most dishonest and slanted things I have ever read from the NYT.
I have no idea what they even want as a recourse? No more plea bargains?
I have no idea what they even want as a recourse? No more plea bargains?
bennyonesix
-
dead man walking
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm
Re: "Hate" Crimes?
Post by dead man walking »
since you haven't read the fla paper's report or reviewed the statistics, you are simply spouting horseshit.
as is your wont.
as is your wont.
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.
dead man walking
-
bennyonesix
- Sgt. Major
- Posts: 2710
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 3:25 am
Re: "Hate" Crimes?
Post by bennyonesix »
Tl:dr The statistics don't prove racism. There is no racially motivated causation shown, merely disparate impact.
No. I read the editorial and the article. That is how I knew what they were doing. Disparate Impact arguments mean one cannot show causation. Use that as your heuristic and you won't go far wrong.
If one reads the article carefully, one notices they do not lay blame anywhere specifically: not the judges, not the pds and not the DAs. They imply strongly that the judges are to blame. But if you parse the argument, they admit sentencing decisions are made before they see the case, but sort of argue that judges have the power of mercy so they are to blame because they didn't sentence the defendants to lesser sentences than their own attorney advocated for them.
The blame is on "the system" and how it is "racist". But like I said it is all disparate impact reasoning: blacks get more time therefore racism. Not necessarily so, and they can't point to any actually racist decisionmaking or even racism.
The system isn't racist in the way they imply. It isn't really racist at all. It is unfair and unjust but not in a racist way. There aren't enough PDs to go around is the main issue. And even if that got corrected, it wouldn't change the discrepancy from the racial perspective. It would just depress sentencing across the board.
No. I read the editorial and the article. That is how I knew what they were doing. Disparate Impact arguments mean one cannot show causation. Use that as your heuristic and you won't go far wrong.
If one reads the article carefully, one notices they do not lay blame anywhere specifically: not the judges, not the pds and not the DAs. They imply strongly that the judges are to blame. But if you parse the argument, they admit sentencing decisions are made before they see the case, but sort of argue that judges have the power of mercy so they are to blame because they didn't sentence the defendants to lesser sentences than their own attorney advocated for them.
The blame is on "the system" and how it is "racist". But like I said it is all disparate impact reasoning: blacks get more time therefore racism. Not necessarily so, and they can't point to any actually racist decisionmaking or even racism.
The system isn't racist in the way they imply. It isn't really racist at all. It is unfair and unjust but not in a racist way. There aren't enough PDs to go around is the main issue. And even if that got corrected, it wouldn't change the discrepancy from the racial perspective. It would just depress sentencing across the board.
bennyonesix