IGX

nafod wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2018 3:30 am

Turdacious wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2018 2:29 am

Grandpa's Spells wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2018 2:26 am You are being very silly.

How so? With Trump you get Gorsuch. How is this worse, from an evangelical perspective, than the other option?h

It's like the evangelicals are willing to have sacrificed a few 10s of virgins to Trump's suckerfish face and tentacles in order to get Gorsuch.

Gene wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2018 2:27 amHere's short one of Markie...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jh4KLEp_pAA

Gene wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2018 2:27 amone of Clinton's conquests....

Turdacious wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2018 4:21 am

nafod wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2018 3:30 am

Turdacious wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2018 2:29 am

Grandpa's Spells wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2018 2:26 am You are being very silly.

How so? With Trump you get Gorsuch. How is this worse, from an evangelical perspective, than the other option?h

It's like the evangelicals are willing to have sacrificed a few 10s of virgins to Trump's suckerfish face and tentacles in order to get Gorsuch.

So, from an evangelical perspective, protecting the unborn isn't worth a President Trump?

JimZipCode wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2018 5:54 am I hadn't heard. Is this an InfoWars thing, or actual? If real, well done.

Gene wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:56 pmData talks, bullshit walks.

JimZipCode wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 4:30 pm

Gene wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:56 pmData talks, bullshit walks.

You seriously cited the National Enquirer.

Melvin noted that detractors say Clinton should've resigned after admitting to having an affair with then-White House intern Monica Lewinsky, and asked the former president whether if he were president "now, in 2018," he would've handled things differently.

Clinton immediately took a defensive tack, saying, "I don't think it would be an issue because people would be using the facts, instead of the imagined facts. If the facts were the same today, I wouldn't [do anything differently]." He added that he believes that "a lot of the facts have been conveniently omitted" from the 20-year-old scandal, blaming the renewed interest on people who are "frustrated" about the "serious allegations" of sexual assault made by many women against President Trump.

"I think I did the right thing. I defended the Constitution," Clinton said, before acknowledging that while he publicly apologized at the time to Lewinsky and her family, he never personally offered his contrition.

Turdacious wrote: ↑Mon Jun 04, 2018 9:25 pm

Melvin noted that detractors say Clinton should've resigned after admitting to having an affair with then-White House intern Monica Lewinsky, and asked the former president whether if he were president "now, in 2018," he would've handled things differently.

Clinton immediately took a defensive tack, saying, "I don't think it would be an issue because people would be using the facts, instead of the imagined facts. If the facts were the same today, I wouldn't [do anything differently]." He added that he believes that "a lot of the facts have been conveniently omitted" from the 20-year-old scandal, blaming the renewed interest on people who are "frustrated" about the "serious allegations" of sexual assault made by many women against President Trump.

"I think I did the right thing. I defended the Constitution," Clinton said, before acknowledging that while he publicly apologized at the time to Lewinsky and her family, he never personally offered his contrition.

https://theweek.com/speedreads/776881/n ... -interview
Same as it ever was, same as it ever was. Pity Melvin didn't ask about Juanita Broadrick.

Bill Clinton Admits That Knowing What He Knows Now He Would Have Still Preyed On Women

NEW YORK—Reflecting on his past indiscretions in light of the #MeToo movement, former President Bill Clinton admitted Monday that knowing what he knows now, he would have still preyed on women. “Man, if I had to do it all over again, I’d probably just do the same horrible stuff to all those girls,” said Clinton, adding that deep down, he felt that taking advantage of a 22-year-old intern just seemed like something he would do again if given the chance. “I did the right thing by acting true to my heart, and that’s God’s honest truth. So, no, I don’t regret making so many unwanted romantic advances. In fact, I cherish each and every one of them. What can I say? I truly adore the chase. Bird’s got to fly. Horse’s got to run. Slick Willy’s got to prowl.”

nafod wrote: ↑Tue Jun 05, 2018 12:17 am

Turdacious wrote: ↑Mon Jun 04, 2018 9:25 pm

Melvin noted that detractors say Clinton should've resigned after admitting to having an affair with then-White House intern Monica Lewinsky, and asked the former president whether if he were president "now, in 2018," he would've handled things differently.

Clinton immediately took a defensive tack, saying, "I don't think it would be an issue because people would be using the facts, instead of the imagined facts. If the facts were the same today, I wouldn't [do anything differently]." He added that he believes that "a lot of the facts have been conveniently omitted" from the 20-year-old scandal, blaming the renewed interest on people who are "frustrated" about the "serious allegations" of sexual assault made by many women against President Trump.

"I think I did the right thing. I defended the Constitution," Clinton said, before acknowledging that while he publicly apologized at the time to Lewinsky and her family, he never personally offered his contrition.

https://theweek.com/speedreads/776881/n ... -interview
Same as it ever was, same as it ever was. Pity Melvin didn't ask about Juanita Broadrick.

Attention whore’s gotta whore

Turdacious wrote: ↑Mon Jun 04, 2018 9:25 pmhttps://theweek.com/speedreads/776881/n ... -interview
Same as it ever was, same as it ever was. Pity Melvin didn't ask about Juanita Broadrick.