IGx libs: which old white broad do you support?

Turdacious · Post by **Turdacious** » Sun Oct 14, 2018 11:41 am

2020 is coming quick.

nafod · Post by **nafod** » Sun Oct 14, 2018 6:26 pm

Kamala Harris

One thing Trump has taught me is that any moron can do the job, and I guess that is a good thing?

Grandpa's Spells · Post by **Grandpa's Spells** » Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:58 pm

The mean age of that crew is a tad high.

Fat Cat · Post by **Fat Cat** » Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:24 pm

One thing for sure is that the name the Democratic Party needs is not on that list.

nafod · Post by **nafod** » Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:32 pm

$10 says it is President Kamala Harris in 2020, unless future president Nikki Haley primaries Trump right in his tiny nuts and runs in the general. Then it will be a toss up.

JimZipCode · Post by **JimZipCode** » Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:33 pm

My wife pays attention, and there's a few guys she likes for the job, but I don't remember them off the top. One of them is in Colorado, maybe Michael Bennett?

I thought last cycle that Corey Booker was someone to keep an eye on.

Fat Cat · Post by **Fat Cat** » Mon Oct 15, 2018 7:15 pm

nafod wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:32 pm $10 says it is President Kamala Harris in 2020, unless future president Nikki Haley primaries Trump right in his tiny nuts and runs in the general. Then it will be a toss up.

This is what I think of when people say Kamala.

Anyhow.

If the election was held today, I think Trump would beat either Harris or Haley. That said, the guy is crazy and 2020 is a long time away in Trump-years; anything could happen in the interim.

Fat Cat · Post by **Fat Cat** » Mon Oct 15, 2018 9:55 pm

What I can't understand is why the Democrats don't lead with a centrist, non-Looney Tunes personality of the Harry Truman variety?

A plain talking personality who focused on inclusiveness as opposed to atomizing the electorate via identity-politicking and improving the lives of all Americans would go pretty far in this day and age.

I think there are very large swathes of the population who would flock to a roll up your sleeves advocate for middle of the road policies that benefit everyone.

nafod · Post by **nafod** » Mon Oct 15, 2018 11:13 pm

Fat Cat wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 9:55 pm What I can't understand is why the Democrats don't lead with a centrist, non-Looney Tunes personality of the Harry Truman variety?

A plain talking personality who focused on inclusiveness as opposed to atomizing the electorate via identity-politicking and improving the lives of all Americans would go pretty far in this day and age.

I think there are very large swathes of the population who would flock to a roll up your sleeves advocate for middle of the road policies that benefit everyone.

We're in this "excite your base" mode of electoral politics, where it is all about voter turnout, it seems. I hope for someone to make a change there.

syaigh · Post by **syaigh** » Mon Oct 15, 2018 11:14 pm

Fat Cat wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 9:55 pm What I can't understand is why the Democrats don't lead with a centrist, non-Looney Tunes personality of the Harry Truman variety?

A plain talking personality who focused on inclusiveness as opposed to atomizing the electorate via identity-politicking and improving the lives of all Americans would go pretty far in this day and age.

I think there are very large swathes of the population who would flock to a roll up your sleeves advocate for middle of the road policies that benefit everyone.

You are goddamned right about that. But, we are clearly too retarded to lead ourselves.

Likewise, I could say the same about the Republicans. I think most of us would vote for a sane, non-fucking-bat-shit-crazy-radical-of-either-party.

#shapechargeforpresident

JimZipCode · Post by **JimZipCode** » Tue Oct 16, 2018 1:34 am

Fat Cat wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 9:55 pmWhat I can't understand is why the Democrats don't lead with a centrist, non-Looney Tunes personality of the Harry Truman variety?

A plain talking personality who focused on inclusiveness as opposed to atomizing the electorate via identity-politicking and improving the lives of all Americans would go pretty far in this day and age.

I think there are very large swathes of the population who would flock to a roll up your sleeves advocate for middle of the road policies that benefit everyone.

That was Hillary.

Schlegel · Post by **Schlegel** » Tue Oct 16, 2018 2:10 am

Fat Cat wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 9:55 pm What I can't understand is why the Democrats don't lead with a centrist, non-Looney Tunes personality of the Harry Truman variety?

A plain talking personality who focused on inclusiveness as opposed to atomizing the electorate via identity-politicking and improving the lives of all Americans would go pretty far in this day and age.

I think there are very large swathes of the population who would flock to a roll up your sleeves advocate for middle of the road policies that benefit everyone.

Jim Webb wasn't left enough to win the primaries.

IGX

IGx libs: which old white broad do you support?

Who gets the 2020 nomination

IGx libs: which old white broad do you support?

Re: IGx libs: which old white broad do you support?

Re: IGx libs: which old white broad do you support?

Re: IGx libs: which old white broad do you support?

Re: IGx libs: which old white broad do you support?

Re: IGx libs: which old white broad do you support?

Re: IGx libs: which old white broad do you support?

Re: IGx libs: which old white broad do you support?

Re: IGx libs: which old white broad do you support?

Re: IGx libs: which old white broad do you support?

Re: IGx libs: which old white broad do you support?

Re: IGx libs: which old white broad do you support?