Page 1 of 1
Seattle PD gets an economics lesson
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 1:45 pm
by Turdacious
Police officers in Seattle, Washington held their first gun buyback program in 20 years this weekend, underneath interstate 5, and soon found that private gun collectors were working the large crowd as little makeshift gun shows began dotting the parking lot and sidewalks. Some even had “cash for guns” signs prominently displayed.
Police stood in awe as gun enthusiasts and collectors waved wads of cash for the guns being held by those standing in line for the buyback program.
People that had arrived to trade in their weapons for $100 or $200 BuyBack gift cards($100 for handguns, shotguns and rifles, and $200 for assault weapons) soon realized that gun collectors were there and paying top dollar for collectible firearms. So, as the line for the chump cards got longer and longer people began to jump ship and head over to the dealers.
http://dcxposed.com/2013/01/27/seattle- ... -show-lol/
Re: Seattle PD gets an economics lesson
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 2:09 pm
by Steggy
Smart thinking
Re: Seattle PD gets an economics lesson
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 4:27 pm
by Pinky
No one who supports these gun buybacks has ever listened to an economics lesson.
Re: Seattle PD gets an economics lesson
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 6:29 pm
by Blaidd Drwg
Was a little snippet on last night with stats from the last buyback in which gun crime increased in the year following. Is an interesting lesson in how effective one might expect gun control to work in a country with 270,000,000 firearms.
Re: Seattle PD gets an economics lesson
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 8:45 pm
by Freki
Back when I was living in Atlanta, a GA Tech stats prof got some pub when he had research the number of guns needed to reach a statistical certainty of saving one life was many thousand (15K is in my head, but I'm not positive that's correct).
Re: Seattle PD gets an economics lesson
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 9:11 pm
by Pinky
There's a lot written about the stupidity of voluntary gun buybacks. Basically, people don't turn in guns unless they're worth less than the amount paid by the Pollyanna dipshits running the buyback. That usually means people turn in worthless crap or guns they need to get rid of "no questions asked".
Re: Seattle PD gets an economics lesson
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:09 am
by JamesonBushmill
Pinky wrote:There's a lot written about the stupidity of voluntary gun buybacks. Basically, people don't turn in guns unless they're worth less than the amount paid by the Pollyanna dipshits running the buyback. That usually means people turn in worthless crap or guns they need to get rid of "no questions asked".
hypothetically, wouldn't this be a good way to get rid of a gun used in a homicide?
...now if only medical school accepted cadavers "no questions asked" ...
Re: Seattle PD gets an economics lesson
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 5:36 am
by Protobuilder
You can't buy drugs with gift cards - the cops obviously don't know their market.
Re: Seattle PD gets an economics lesson
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:31 am
by Turdacious
Pro athletes v. Gov. Moonbeam on economics:
The Golden State's new 13.3 percent income tax on top earners prompted golfer Phil Mickelson to say earlier this month he was considering a move, and according to the accountants who advise millionaire athletes, he was just saying what a lot of jocks were already thinking. Federal taxes on the top income bracket just rose by roughly 5 percent, and, while there's nothing rich athletes can do about that, they are paying attention to which states dip into their game checks — and how much they take.
“They’re going to have an exodus of people,” said John Karaffa, president of ProSport CPA, a Virginia-based firm that represents nearly 300 professional athletes, primarily in basketball and football. “I think they’ll see some [leave California] for sure. They were already a very high tax state and it’s getting to a point where folks have to make a business decision as well as a lifestyle decision.”
Read more:
http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2013/01/3 ... z2JW4fw4MM
Re: Seattle PD gets an economics lesson
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:41 am
by Protobuilder
Turdacious wrote:Pro athletes v. Gov. Moonbeam on economics:
The Golden State's new 13.3 percent income tax on top earners prompted golfer Phil Mickelson to say earlier this month he was considering a move, and according to the accountants who advise millionaire athletes, he was just saying what a lot of jocks were already thinking. Federal taxes on the top income bracket just rose by roughly 5 percent, and, while there's nothing rich athletes can do about that, they are paying attention to which states dip into their game checks — and how much they take.
“They’re going to have an exodus of people,” said John Karaffa, president of ProSport CPA, a Virginia-based firm that represents nearly 300 professional athletes, primarily in basketball and football. “I think they’ll see some [leave California] for sure. They were already a very high tax state and it’s getting to a point where folks have to make a business decision as well as a lifestyle decision.”
Read more:
http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2013/01/3 ... z2JW4fw4MM
That is not new. For years, the Dallas Mavericks have pitched the idea that their contracts are worth more in athletes' pockets due to the lack of a personal income tax in Texas, especially compared to states like New York or California.